Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T14:53:22.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

El desarrollo y validación de una versión española de la Escala de calidad de vida en la depresión (QLDS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

S. Cervera-Enguix
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría y Psicología Médica. Clínica Universitaria, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
N. Ramírez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría y Psicología Médica. Clínica Universitaria, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
N. Girala
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría y Psicología Médica. Clínica Universitaria, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España
S. P. McKenna
Affiliation:
Galen Research, Manchester, Reino Unido
Get access

Resumen

Objetivo:

La adaptación de la Escala de Calidad de Vida en la Depresión, QLDS, al español.

Métodos:

Dos grupos de traducción consideraron la versión original del Reino Unido de la QLDS y produjeron una traducción española. Se dio prioridad a la equivalencia conceptual, antes que a la semántica. Esta versión se comprobó luego en un ensayo de campo con 15 pacientes deprimidos. El estadio final de la investigación implicaba un estudio por correo de 62 pacientes, a quienes se pidió que completaran la medida en dos ocasiones.

Resultados:

Se encontró que la QLDS española era apropiada y aceptable por los pacientes deprimidos. La fiabilidad test-retest y la consistencia interna del cuestionario fueron altas ambas, y las puntuaciones de la QLDS correlacionaron como se predecía con las puntuaciones en las secciones del Perfil de Salud de Nottingham. La medida era sensible a los niveles diferentes de depresión evaluados por la Escala Hospitalaria de Ansiedad y Depresión.

Conclusión:

La versión española de la QLDS es idónea para su uso en ensayos clínicos y para controlar a los pacientes individuales en la práctica clínica de rutina.

Type
Artículo original
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliografía

Alonso, JAntó, JMMoreno, C.The Spanish version of the Nottingham Health Profile: translation and preliminary validity. Am J Public Health 1990; 80: 704–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bech, P.Rating Scales for Psychopathology Health Status and Quality of Life. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1993. p. 395424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celia, DFTulsky, DSMeasuring quality of life today: methodological aspects. Oncology 1990; 4: 2938.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, RFletcher, AGore, SJones, DSpiegelgalter, DCox, DQuality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment. BMJ 1992; 305: 1074–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, AGore, SJones, DFitzpatrick, RSpiegelhalter, DCox, DQuality of life measures in health care. II: Design, analysis and interpretation. BMJ 1992; 305: 1145–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodinson, SMSingleton, JQuality of life: a critical review of current concepts, measures and their clinical implications. Int J Nurs Stud 1989; 26: 327–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregoire, JLeval, NMesters, Pet al.Validation of the quality in depression scale in a population of adult depressive patients aged 60 and above. Qual Life Research 1994; 3: 13–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, RDAnderson, RRevicki, DPsychometric consideration in evaluating health-related quality of life measures. Qual Life Research 1993; 2: 441–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrichs, DWHanlon, TECarpenter, WTThe Quality of Life Scale: An instrument for rating the schizophrenic deficit syndrome. Schizophrenia Bull 1984; 10: 388–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helmstadter, GCPrincipies of Psychological Measurement. London; Methuen: 1966.Google Scholar
Hunt, SMMcKenna, SPMcEwen, JWilliams, Jet al.The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Social Science and Medicine 1981; 15A: 221–9.Google Scholar
Hunt, SMAlonso, JBucquet, DNiero, MWiklund, IMcKenna, SPCross-cultural adaptation of health measures. Health Policy 1991; 19: 3344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, SMcKenna, SP.The QLDS: A scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression. Health Policy 1992; 22: 307–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, Set al.(European Group for Quality of Life Assessment and Health Measurement) European Guide to the Nottingham Health Profile. Brookwood, Surrey: Brookwood Medical Publications; 1993.Google Scholar
Hyland, MEA reformulation of quality of life for medical Science. Qual Life Research 1992; 1: 267–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehman, AFWard, NCLinn, LSChronic mental patients: The quality of life issue. Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139: 1271–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Lehman, AFPostrado, LTRachuba, LTConvergent validation of quality of life assessments for persons with severe mental illnesses. Qual Life Research 1993; 2: 153–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malm, UMay, PDencker, SEvaluation of the quality of life of the schizophrenic outpatient: a checklist. Schizophrenia Bull 1981; 7: 477–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeigan, LDPathak, DSOver View of health-related quality-of-life measures. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992; 49: 2236–45.Google Scholar
McKenna, SPHunt, SMA new measure of quality of life in depression: Testing the reliability and construct validity of the QLDS. Health Policy 1992; 22: 321–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mesters, PCosyns, PDejaiffe, GFanielle, JGilles, CGodderis, Jet al.Assessment of quality of life in the treatment of major depressive disorder with fluoxetine, 20 mg, in ambulatory patients aged over 60 years. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1993; 8: 337–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patrick, DLWild, DJohnson, EJWagner, THMartin, MACross-cultural validation of Quality of Life Measures. In: Orley, JKuyken, W eds. Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1994 p. 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartorius, NKuiken, W In: Orley, JKuyken, W eds. Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1994 p. 118.Google Scholar
Stewart, ALGreenfield, SHays, RDWells, KRogers, WHBerry, SDet al.Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA 1989; 262: 907–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuynman-Qua, H De Johnghe, FMcKenna, SHunt, SQuality of life depression rating scale. Houten, The Netherlands: Ibero; 1992.Google Scholar
Tuynman-Qua, H De Jonghe, FMcKenna, SPQuality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS). Development, reliability, validity, responsiveness and application. Eur Psychiatry 1997; 12: 199202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whalley, DMcKenna, SPMeasuring quality of life in patients with anxiety or depression. Pharmaco Economics 1995; 8: 305–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHOQOL Group. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Research 1993; 2: 153–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zigmond, ASnaith, RThe hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed