Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T22:13:03.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1813 – Clinical Predictors Associated With Antidepressant Response And Remission After Rtms In Resistant Depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

J.B. Pretalli
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychiatry, University Hospital, Besançon
M. Nicolier
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychiatry, University Hospital, Besançon CIC-IT 808 Inserm, University Hospital, Besançon
J. Monnin
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychiatry, University Hospital, Besançon CIC-IT 808 Inserm, University Hospital, Besançon
G. Tio
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychiatry, University Hospital, Besançon CIC-IT 808 Inserm, University Hospital, Besançon
D. Sechter
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychiatry, University Hospital, Besançon
P. Vandel
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychiatry, University Hospital, Besançon CIC-IT 808 Inserm, University Hospital, Besançon
E. Haffen
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychiatry, University Hospital, Besançon CIC-IT 808 Inserm, University Hospital, Besançon Fondamental Foundation, Hopital Chenevier, Créteil, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is widely investigated and has been proved to have positive effect on treatment-resistant depression. The Food and Drug Administration has authorized rTMS to be used in this indication in several countries. However, patients do not all benefit equally from rTMS.

Objective

We therefore sought to identify the clinical and demographic factors associated with response and remission after rTMS in chronic and resistant depression.

Methods

76 patients suffering from unipolar or bipolar depressive episode received 10 high frequency rTMS sessions, one per day, over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (10 Hz, 95% Motor Threshold, 5s on, 25s off). All patients were antidepressant-free or taking a stable antidepressant drug for at least one month.

Results

Nearly half of patients had responded to the treatment (47.4%) and 16 went into remission (21.1%) by the end of the study (immediately after the last rTMS session). Morover, as shown by using simple and multiple logistic regressions, the age at which the first episode occurred and the initial level of state anxiety were associated with a higher response rate. A hyperthymic temperament and a greater trait anxiety were shown to be associated to a higher remission rate.

Conclusion

The results obtained suggest that unipolar and bipolar patients may react differently to rTMS. These two subgroups of affective disorders could benefit from specific, separate paradigms.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.