Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:49:58.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A pilot study of the “Continuation of Care” model in “revolving-door” patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

A. Juven-Wetzler ,
D. Bar-Ziv ,
S. Cwikel-Hamzany ,
A. Abudy ,
N. Peri  and
J. Zohar
A. Juven-Wetzler
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
D. Bar-Ziv
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
S. Cwikel-Hamzany
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
A. Abudy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
N. Peri
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
J. Zohar*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
*
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +972-3530-3300; fax: +972-3535-2788. E-mail address: jzohar@post.tau.ac.il (J. Zohar).
Get access

Abstract

Purpose:

The efficiency of continuation of care (COC) treatment by inpatient caregivers as compared to treatment administered by outpatient services for “revolving door” psychiatric patients was tested in this study. Number and days of hospitalization were examined.

Method:

All patients who were hospitalized three times or more during the past 12months were offered continuing follow-up in the ward, by the same staff, instead of being referred to the outpatient department. Information on number and length of hospitalizations before and after initiation of this care model was retrieved from the hospital computerized database.

Results:

Of the 36 patients meeting the criteria, 35 patients agreed to participate. The number of hospitalizations in the 18months following the index hospitalization was 1.79±3.51 as compared to 4.67±1.79 before the index hospitalization (p = 0.0002), and the number of days of hospitalization 18months after was 24±41.65 as compared to 119.71±69.31 before (p<0.0001).

Conclusion:

COC via inpatient follow-up significantly reduces the number and length of hospitalizations in “revolving door” psychiatric patients as compared to the traditional system of follow-up in an outpatient clinic.

Keywords

Economics and PsychiatryHealth EconomicsQuality of LifePsychiatry in EuropeQuality of Care
Type
Original articles
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , May 2012 , pp. 229 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adair, C.E., McDougall, G.M., Mitton, C.R., Joyce, A.S., Wild, T.C., Gordon, A.et al.Continuity of care and health outcomes among persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2005; 56: 1061–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachrach, L.L.Continuity of care for chronic mental patients: a conceptual analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 1981; 138: 1449–1456.Google ScholarPubMed
Bobo, W.V., Hoge, C.W., Messina, M.A., Pavlovcic, F., Levandowski, D., Grieger, T.Characteristics of repeat users of an inpatient psychiatry service at a large military tertiary care hospital. Mil Med. 2004; 169: 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, U.A., Koen, L., Joska, J.A., Parker, J.S., Horn, N., Hering, L.M.et al.The revolving door phenomenon in psychiatry: comparing low-frequency and high-frequency users of psychiatric inpatient services in a developing country. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010; 45: 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, C.A., McAlpine, D.D., Pottick, K.J., Olfson, M.Identifying risk factors and key strategies in linkage to outpatient psychiatric care. Am J Psychiatry. 2000; 157: 1592–1598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durbin, J., Lin, E., Layne, C., Teed, M.Is readmission a valid indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care?. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2007; 34: 137–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, S., Stevens, R.F.Subgroups of frequent users of an inpatient mental health program at a community hospital in Canada. Psychiatr Serv. 1999; 50: 244–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, R.S., Casper, E.S.A comparative study of clinical events as triggers for psychiatric readmission of multiple recidivists. Psychiatr Serv. 1998; 49: 1423–1425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, W., Gougleris, G., Panzer, M., Tigiser, E., Warken, R., Zimmer, F.P.Multiple admissions to the psychiatric hospital–a study of the status of so-called “revolving door patients”. Psychiatr Prax. 1992; 19: 217–224.Google ScholarPubMed
Ilgen, M.A., Unger, K., Moss, R.H., Mckellar, J.Continuing care after inpatient psychiatric treatment for patients with psychiatric and substance use disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 2008; 59: 982–988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S., Robinson, E., Kumar, S.V.What leads to frequent re-hospitalisation when community care is not well developed?. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2002; 37: 435–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, T., Joyce, P.R.The new revolving-door patients: results from a national cohort of first admissions. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1990; 82: 130–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichtenberg, P., Levinson, D., Sharshevsky, Y., Feldman, D., Lachman, M.Clinical case management of revolving door patients - a semi-randomized study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008; 117: 449–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roick, C., Heider, D., Kilian, R., Matschinger, H., Toumi, M., Angermeyer, M.C.Factors contributing to frequent use of psychiatric inpatient services by schizophrenia patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004; 39: 744–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saarento, O., Kastrup, M., Lonnerberg, O., Göstas, G., Muus, S., Sandlund, M.et al.The Nordic Comparative Study on Sectorized Psychiatry: patients who use only psychiatric in-patient care in comprehensive community-based services-- a l-year follow-up study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1998; 98: 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, N.C., Bassani, D.G., Palazzo, L.S.A case-control study of factors associated with multiple psychiatric readmissions. Psychiatr Serv. 2009; 60: 786–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sledge, W.H., Dunn, C.L., Schmutte, T.Surprising predictor of rehospitalization, letter to editor. Psychiatr Serv. 2008; 59: 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiden, P., Glazer, W.Assessment and treatment selection for “revolving door” inpatients with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Q. 1997; 68: 377–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.