Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-zc66z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-04T04:19:24.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Continuous theta burst stimulation over the bilateral supplementary motor area in obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment: A clinical randomized single-blind sham-controlled trial – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2025

Abstract

Type
Corrigendum
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association

This article contains an error in Table 1, which in one of the row headings refers to the duration of illness (years). This should be the duration of illness (months). The correct version of the table is presented below.

Table 1. Demographic data and clinical characteristic in baseline

Abbreviations: C-YBOCS, compulsion sub-score of Yale–Brown obsessive-compulsive scale; HAMD24, Hamilton depression scale; HAMA14, Hamilton anxiety scale; OBQ44, obsessive belief questionnaire; O-YBOCS, obsession sub-score of Yale–Brown obsessive-compulsive scale; YBOCS, Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive disorder scale

Secondly, the Methods: Treatment section of the article also contains an error in the sentence “The average stimulator intensity was 40% RMT in both groups.” This should read “The average stimulator intensity was 40% MSO (maximal stimulator output) in both groups.”

References

Guo, Q, Wang, K, Han, H, Li, P, Cheng, J, Zhu, J, Wang, Z, Fan, Q (2022). Continuous theta burst stimulation over the bilateral supplementary motor area in obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment: A clinical randomized single-blind sham-controlled trial. European Psychiatry, 65(1), e64, 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic data and clinical characteristic in baseline

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.