Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:03:09.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feasibility and effectiveness of interpersonal psychotherapy interventions in a collaborative stepped care model between primary care and mental health services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

F. Mongelli*
Affiliation:
Department Of Medical And Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
F. Martino
Affiliation:
Department Of Mental Health, Community Mental Health Centre Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy
D. Berardi
Affiliation:
Department Of Medical And Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
N. Colombini
Affiliation:
Department Of Mental Health, Modena, Local Health Unit Castelfranco Emilia, Castelfranco Emilia, Italy
S. Ferrari
Affiliation:
Department Of Biomedical, Metabolic And Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
M. Menchetti
Affiliation:
Department Of Medical And Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The NICE guidelines recommend for mild major depression a range of low-intensity psychosocial intervention of proven effectiveness, as Interpersonal Counselling, and a stepped-care approach.

Objectives

To assess feasibility and effectiveness of Interpersonal Psychotherapy interventions for the treatment of depression in a consolidated Collaborative Stepped Care Model between primary care and mental health specialists.

Methods

103 patients were referred by their PCPs to the Consultation-Liaison Service of Bologna and Modena. Of them, 78 were included in the study and administered self-report instruments and interview, including screening depression, anxiety and daily functioning. Patients were asked to choose one of the available treatment: 1) Interpersonal Counseling (IPC) 6-8 weekly meetings for 30 minutes; 2) IPC for Depression in Primary Care 3 sessions of 50 minutes; 3) a guided self-help intervention. Follow-up were planned at 1, 3 and 6 months. Both patients and PCPs provided a feedback about intervention’s satisfactions.

Results

At the baseline, 39.4% of the patients presented a minor depression/major depression mild and the large majority (75.0%) of them chose IPC, while none of them chose the guided self-help intervention. At follow ups the mean PHQ-9 significantly decreased compared to the baseline (p<0.001); daily functioning increased (WSAS: p<0.001) and anxiety traits improved (STAI: p<0.001). Patient’s general satisfaction with the service received was high (GSQ: 85.9±15.0) as well as PCPs, 62.7% of them expressed high satisfaction for the intervention.

Conclusions

The study emphasised that IPC is an effective and feasible treatment very well suited to the primary care setting for an optimal management of depression.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.