Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T02:27:59.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of asenapine for acute schizophrenia: comparisons with placebo and other atypical antipsychotics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

A. Szegedi
Affiliation:
Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA
P. Verweij
Affiliation:
MSD, Oss, The Netherlands
W. van Duijnhoven
Affiliation:
MSD, Oss, The Netherlands
M. Mackle
Affiliation:
Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA
P. Cazorla
Affiliation:
Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA
C. Karson
Affiliation:
Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA
H. Fennema
Affiliation:
MSD, Oss, The Netherlands

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Asenapine is an FDA-approved atypical antipsychotic (AAP) indicated in adults for treatment of schizophrenia.

Objective

Present meta-analyses of asenapine vs placebo and other antipsychotics in acute schizophrenia.

Aim

Further demonstrate the efficacy of asenapine in acute schizophrenia.

Methods

PANSS total score changes from baseline to week 6 were assessed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) and mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). Comparisons of asenapine and antipsychotics vs placebo were obtained from 4 placebo-controlled asenapine studies. Head-to-head comparisons among AAPs assessed in the same trials (including those for which no direct comparisons are available) were conducted with network meta-analyses using a published database (Leucht et al, Am J Psychiatry 2009;166:152–166) of 74 studies updated with data from 5 AAP-controlled asenapine trials.

Results

PANSS change from baseline with asenapine exceeded that of placebo (LOCF: 3.7 [95% CI, 1.5–5.9], P = 0.001; MMRM: 4.1 [95% CI, 1.6–6.5], P = 0.001), a treatment effect comparable to other antipsychotics (LOCF: 4.1 [95% CI, 1.7–6.5], P = 0.001; MMRM: 4.6 [95% CI, 1.9–7.3], P = 0.001). Head-to-head network meta-analysis reported comparable efficacy with asenapine and other AAPs; PANSS differences ranged from 3.9 points better than ziprasidone (95% CI, 0.3–7.4) to 2.9 points worse than olanzapine (95% CI, -5.-0.1).

Discussion

These meta-analyses demonstrate superiority of asenapine over placebo in acute schizophrenia, with treatment effects of asenapine at least comparable to antipsychotics used in the same studies. Further, the network meta-analysis suggests the efficacy of asenapine for acute schizophrenia is comparable to that of established AAPs.

Type
P03-341
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.