No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Moving forwards with the Standard THC Unit: what are the next steps?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 August 2024
Abstract
Current metrics of cannabis use are inconsistent. This issue prevents the integration of the literature to date and to robustly measure the health risks and benefits associated with specific levels of cannabis consumption. This talk will overview a number of international initiatives to improve the current metrics of cannabis use.
The Standard THC Unit was created to objectively measure cannabis potency across all products, mode of administration, jurisdictions, contexts and over time.
To build upon the notion of the Standard THC Unit, addional multidisciplinary, international consensus based frameworks have been created.
One such ongoing initiatives, seeks to reach expert consensus on how cannabis potency should be reported in cannabis products in order to clearly and effectively inform consumers. The talk will overview preliminary results of the Delphi.
A similar Delphi methodology was used to establish internationally agreed-upon minimum standards to measure cannabis consumption in research (iCannToolkit), the results of which will be outlined.
Overall, it is imperative for cannabis researchers to join forces with multidisciplinary experts in order to improve metrics of use to inform consumers, general practitioners, researchers and public health experts on the harms and benefits associated with cannabis use.
None Declared
- Type
- Abstract
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 67 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 32nd European Congress of Psychiatry , April 2024 , pp. S33 - S34
- Creative Commons
- This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.