Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T12:32:45.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of the European Commission in supporting research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Abstract

The European Community Treaty ascribes a precise role in the promotion of research to the Commission. The contribution of EC-sponsored research to industrial competitiveness, socio-economic development and scientific knowledge is discussed on the basis of recent experience and with reference to new goals. In this framework, problems of scientific and administrative management and the relations of the European Community with other European and national research systems are examined. An increasing role is suggested for EC research as an early warning system about emerging problems, based on the scientific assessment of weak signals. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.European Union (1995) Selected Instruments taken from the Treaties, Book I, Vol I, pp. 91401, Luxemburg.Google Scholar
2.European Commission (1994) European Science and Technology Indicators, Report EUR 15897 EN, Luxemburg.Google Scholar
3.Commission des Communautes Europeennes (1995) Activités de Recherchee et de Developpement Technologique de l'Union Europenne, Rapport Annuel 1995, COM(95) 443, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
4.Commission des Communautes Europeennes (1996) Activités de Recherche et de Developpement Technologique de l'Union Européenne, Rapport Annuel 1996, COM(96) 437, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
5.Durant, J., Bauer, M., Midden, C., Gaskell, G., Liakopoulos, M. and Scholten, L. (1995) Public Understanding of Science and Technology in Europe, European Commission, Bruxelles, 09 1992.Google Scholar
6.Georghiou, L. et al. (1992) Impact of European Community Policies for Research and Technological Development Upon Science and Technology in the United Kingdom, European Commission, Brussels, 09 1992.Google Scholar
7.Laréedo, P. (1994) Etude d'Impact. Ecole Superieure des Mines, 12 1994.Google Scholar
8.Desama, C. (1996) On the Prospects for European Science and Technology Policy in the 21st Century: Future Directions for Policy European Parliament 219.371, page 2. Brussels and Luxemburg.Google Scholar
9.Desama, C. (1996) On the Prospects for European Science and Technology Policy in the 21st Century: Analysis of the Issues European Parliament 214.682, Brussels and Luxemburg.Google Scholar
10. Ministerial Conference (1985) Declaration of Principles relating to EUREKA Hannover, 6 11 1985.Google Scholar
11.European Union (1996) Contributions from CREST on Key Questions Relating to the Fifth Framework Programme, CREST/1230/96, Bruxelles, 19 11 1996.Google Scholar
12.Commission Europeenne (1995) Livre Vert sur l'Innovation, Luxemburg.Google Scholar
13.Nature (1996) 383, 653.Google Scholar
14.Bloom, F. (1996) Science 273, 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Bloch, E. (1996) Science 273, 1779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.US Council on Competitiveness (1996) Endless Frontiers, Limited Resources, Washington.Google Scholar
17.di Lisbona, Gruppo (1995) I Limiti della Competitività, Manifesto Libri Roma.Google Scholar
18.Nature (1996) 383, 471.Google Scholar
19.Association Pacte (1996) Technologie, Ethique et Société, Assemblée Nationale 4 Juin.Google Scholar
20.European Commission (1994) Commission decision on the Creation of the European Science and Technology Assembly (ESTA). Official Journal of the European Communities 98/34.Google Scholar
21.European Commission (1984) Commission Decision on the Creation of the Industrial Research and Development Advisory Committee (IRDAC), Official Journal of the European Communities 84/128.Google Scholar
22.Council of Ministers of the European Communities (1974) and (1995) Council Resolution on the Creation of CREST. Official Journal of the European Communities 29/1/74 and 25/10/95.Google Scholar
23.STOA (Scientific and Technological Options Assessment) Decision of the European Parliament, 03 1987.Google Scholar
24.Nature (1996) The Hazards of Government Data 383, 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Nature (1996) 384, 201.Google Scholar
26.Nature (1996) 383, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.CIBA Foundation (1996) Antibiotic Resistance: Origins, Evolution, Selection and Spread. Symposium N. 207. London161807, 1996.Google Scholar
28.Alonso-Amelot, M. E., Castillo, U., Smith, B. L. and Lauren, L. (1996) Nature 382, 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Nature (1996) 383, 559.Google Scholar
30.Swinbanks, D. (1996) Nature 382, 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Nature (1996) 382, 563.Google Scholar
32.Fasella, P. (1996) International cooperation on large scientific projects: the European Experience.Final European Conference on the Yeast Genome Sequencing Network, pp. 7990.Google Scholar
33.Joint Research Centre (1996) Annual Reports 1995 and 1996. Brussels and Luxemburg.Google Scholar
34.European Commission, DG XII (1995) The Access to large Facilities Programme 1994–1998, Brussels and Luxemburg.Google Scholar
35.European Commission, DG XII (1995) Reports on the Study Panels on Large Installations: Neutron Beam Sources, High Power Lasers, Large Magnetic Fields, Ground Astronomy and Astrophysics, Hydraulics, Free-Electron Lasers, Combustion Technologies, Environmental Sciences, Earthquake Engineering, Analytical Facilities, Oceanography, Social Sciences. Brussels and Luxemburg.Google Scholar
36. Enrich, European Network for Research in Global Change (1994) Official Journal L 3461 of 31.12, 1994.Google Scholar
37.Oliver, S., Johnston, M., Casari, G., de Daruvar, A., Sander, C. and Schneider, R. (1996) Trends in Genetics 12, 241243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.European Commission (1995) Report on the AMICA Project, Luxemburg.Google Scholar
39.Stoddart, J. F. and Reinhoudt, D. N. (Eds) (1991) Supermolecular Science and Technology: a report from The European Group. The Netherlands Technology Foundation Birmingham and Enschede.Google Scholar
40.Mueller, and Beugholt, C. (1996) Nature 383 296297, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Bénéfice-Malouet, S. and Reichert, B. (Eds) (1994) COST Chemistry Action Report (1994) COST Chemistry, Secretariat CEC DG XII, Brussels.Google Scholar
42.Hebel, W. (Ed.) (1996) Exploring Nanophysics in Condensed Matter, Trend, 3, 1104, EUR 16670 Brussels.Google Scholar
43.Gros, F. (Ed.) (1996) ESTA Report on the Life Sciences, European Commission, DG XII, Brussels, 1996.Google Scholar
44.Huerta, M. H. and Matthiesen, L. (Eds) (1996) Neuroimage 4, 165.Google Scholar
45.Nature (1996) 383, 754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46.Commission Europeenne (1996) Education, Formation, Recherche: Les Obstacles à la Mobilité Transnationale, Livre Vert. Bruxelles, 29 09. 1996.Google Scholar
47.European Commission (1996) SCIC-Universities Conference, Brussels, 25 11. 1996.Google Scholar
48.Abbott, A. (1996) Nature 383, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49.Commission Europeenne, Science, Recherche, Developpement (1996) Inventer Demain, La Recherce Européenne au Service du Citoyen, Orientation pour le 5ème Programme Cadre, EUR 16961, Luxemburg.Google Scholar
50.Nature (1996) 383, 754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51.European Commission, Science Research and Development (1994) The Management of Research Programmes. Luxemburg.Google Scholar
52.European Commission (1992) Decision concerning the Creations of an International Association to Promote the Co-operation with Scientists in the Independent States of the former Soviet Union (INTAS), SEC (92) 1347, Brussels.Google Scholar
53.Blundell, D., Freeman, R. and Mueller, S. (Eds) (1993) A Continent Revealed, The European Geotraverse, E.S.F., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
54.European Science Foundation and European Commission DG XII (1996) Greenland Ice Core Project, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
55. Conference of Research Ministers (1971) Resolution for European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research (COST), Brussels, 11. 23.Google Scholar