Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:07:53.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEQUENTIAL EFFECTS OF MINIMUM TILLAGE, SEED PRIMING, FERTILIZER MICRODOSING AND MULCHING IN MAIZE, SEMIARID CENTRAL RIFT VALLEY OF ETHIOPIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2015

GETACHEW SIME  and
JENS B. AUNE
GETACHEW SIME*
Affiliation:
Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric), Norwegian University of life Sciences (NMBU), P. O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
JENS B. AUNE
Affiliation:
Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric), Norwegian University of life Sciences (NMBU), P. O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
*
†Corresponding author. Email: getachew.feyissa@nmbu.no or abigiag@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Intensification of maize production is imperative to improve food security for the rising population in the central rift valley (CRV) of Ethiopia, whose livelihood is principally based on rainfed maize that operates under shrinking landholding and high seasonal rainfall variability. This study examined different levels of intensification options in maize production by sequentially introducing minimum tillage and seed priming, phosphorus (P) fertilizer microdosing, surface mulching and nitrogen (N) fertilizer microdosing. Field experiments were conducted with five treatments, steps or levels consisting of conventional tillage (farmers practice as a control); minimum tillage + seed priming, unfertilized (step 1); step 1 + microdosing 53 kg ha−1 P (step 2); step 2 + 4 ton ha−1 maize stover as surface mulch (step 3) and step 3 + 53 kg ha−1 N (step 4). These steps represented increasing levels of intensification. Except at the lowest level (step 1), agronomic and economic responses improved with increasing levels of inputs. Relative to the very high and increasing gross margin, production costs were low but slowly increased with increasing levels of inputs. Except at the lowest level, the value cost ratio was above 4 even at the highest levels of inputs, demonstrating that such kind of intensification can be achieved with low risk. Likewise, the fertilizer use efficiency was quite high even at the highest of levels of inputs signifying the efficiency of the pocket application of fertilizer through the microdosing method. The improvement in maize establishment and yield and the reduction in the days to maturity could contribute to make maize production more adaptive to the existing seasonal rainfall variability. Depending on the affordability to the external inputs and their feasibilities, the different technology packages in the intensification ladder may give different choices for the farmers to improve maize production in the CRV of Ethiopia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 331 - 345
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aune, J. B. and Bationo, A. (2008). Agricultural intensification in the Sahel - the ladder approach. Agricultural Systems 98 (2):119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aune, J. B., Bussa, M. T., Asfaw, F. G. and Ayele, A. A. (2001). The ox ploughing system in Ethiopia: can it be sustained? Outlook on Agriculture 30:275–280.Google Scholar
Aune, J. B., Doumbia, M. and Berthe, A. (2007). Microfertilizing sorghum and pearl millet in Mali: agronomic, economic and social feasibility. Outlook on Agriculture 36 (5):199–203.Google Scholar
Aune, J. B. and Ousman, A. (2011). Effect of seed priming and micro-dosing of fertilizer on sorghum and pearl millet in Western Sudan. Experimental Agriculture 47 (3):419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biazin, B. and Stroosnijder, L. (2012). To tie or not to tie ridges for water conservation in Rift Valley drylands of Ethiopia. Soil Tillage Research 124:83–94.Google Scholar
Blocka, P. J., Strzepekb, K., Rosegrantc, M. W. and Diaoc, X. (2008). Impacts of considering climate variability on investment decisions in Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics 39:171–181.Google Scholar
Byerlee, D., Spielman, D. J., Alemu, D. and Gautam, M. (2007). Policies to Promote Cereal Intensification in Ethiopia: A Review of Evidence and Experience. International Food Policy Research Institute Discussion Paper 00707, June 2007, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Conway, D. and Schipper, E. L. F. (2011). Adaptation to climate change in Africa: challenges and opportunities identified from Ethiopia. Global Environmental Change 21:227–237.Google Scholar
CSA (2008). Preliminary Tabulations. census results, Addis Ababa, available at: www.csa.gov.et (accessed 23 May 2014).Google Scholar
Demeke, A. B., Keil, A. and Zeller, M. (2011). Using panel data to estimate the effect of rainfall shocks on smallholders food security and vulnerability in rural Ethiopia. Climatic Change 108:185–206.Google Scholar
Dorosh, P. and Rashid, S. (2013). Food and Agriculture in Ethiopia: Progress and Policy Challenges, International Food Policy Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104–4112, available at: www.upenn.edu/pennpress (accessed 18 May 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endale, K. (2010). Fertilizer consumption and agricultural productivity in Ethiopia. In The Ethiopian Development Research Institute Working Papers, February 2011, vol. 003, 1–37 (Eds Gebre-ab, N. and Dorosh, P.). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI).Google Scholar
FAO (2013). Basic Principles of Conservation Agriculture. Available at: http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/1a.html (accessed 13 December 2014).Google Scholar
Garedew, E., Sandewall, M., Söderberg, U. and Campbell, B. M. (2009). Land-use and land-cover dynamics in the central rift valley of Ethiopia. Environmental Management 44:683–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M. and Tittonell, P. (2009). Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretics’ view. Field Crops Research 114 (1):23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haileslassie, A., Priess, J., Veldkamp, E., Teketay, D. and Lesschen, J. P. (2005). Assessment of soil nutrient depletion and its spatial variability on smallholders’ mixed farming systems in Ethiopia using partial versus full nutrient balances. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 108:1–16.Google Scholar
Harris, D., Joshi, A., Khan, P. A., Gothkar, P. and Sodhi, P. S. (1999). On-farm seed priming in semiarid agriculture: development and evaluation in maize, rice and chickpea in India using participatory Methods. Experimental Agriculture 35:15–29.Google Scholar
Kassie, B. T., Hengsdijk, H., Rötter, R. P., Kahiluto, H., Asseng, S. and Ittersum, M. K. V. (2013). Adapting to climate variability and change: experiences from cereal-based farming in the Central Rift and Kobo Valleys, Ethiopia. Environ Manage 52:1115–1131.Google Scholar
Kassie, B. T., Rötter, R. P., Hengsdijk, R. H., Asseng, S., van Ittersum, M. K., Kahiluto, H. and van Keulen, H. (2014). Climate variability and change in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia: challenges for rainfed crop production. The Journal of Agricultural Science 52:58–74.Google Scholar
Koning, N., Heerink, N. and Kauffman, S. (1998). Integrated soil improvement and agricultural development in West Africa: why current policy apporaches fail. Wageningen Agricultural University, available at: http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/41106, urn:nbn:nl:ui:32-41106 (accessed March 28 2014).Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T., Plucknett, D. L. and Mohamed, K. (2004). Evaluation of Sasakawa Global 2000 Program in Ethiopia, 1992–2002. Sasakawa Africa Association. Sasakawa Global 2000. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Meshesha, D. T., Tsunekawa, A. and Tsubo, M. (2012). Continuing land degradation: cause–effect in Ethiopia's Central Rift Valley. Land Degradation & Development 23 (2):130–143.Google Scholar
Nyssen, J., Temesgen, H., Lemenih, M., Zenebe, A., Haregeweyn, N. and Haile, M. (2008). Spatial and temporal variation of soil organic carbon stocks in a lake retreat area of the Ethiopian Rift Valley. Geoderma 146:261–268.Google Scholar
SAS (2011). SAS Institute Inc. for windows, Base SAS® 9.3, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sime, G. and Aune, J. B. (2014). Maize response to fertilizer dosing at three sites in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Agronomy 4:436–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sime, G., Aune, J. B. and Mohammed, H. (2015). Agronomic and economic response of tillage and water conservation management in maize, central rift valley in Ethiopia. Soil & Tillage Research 148:20–30.Google Scholar
Spielman, D. J., Byerlee, D., Alemu, D. and Kelemework, D. (2010). Policies to promote cereal intensification in Ethiopia: the search for appropriate public and private roles. Food Policy 35 (3):185–194.Google Scholar
Temesgen, M., Rockstrom, J., Savenije, H. H. G., Hoogmoed, W. B. and Alemu, D. (2008). Determinants of tillage frequency among smallholder farmers in two semi-arid areas in Ethiopia. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 33 (1–2):183–191.Google Scholar