Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T21:53:02.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WATER SAVING, WATER PRODUCTIVITY AND YIELD OUTPUTS OF FINE-GRAIN RICE CULTIVARS UNDER CONVENTIONAL AND WATER-SAVING RICE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2015

K. JABRAN ,
E. ULLAH ,
M. HUSSAIN ,
M. FAROOQ ,
N. HAIDER  and
B. S. CHAUHAN
K. JABRAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan Department of Plant Protection, Adnan Menderes University Aydin, Turkey
E. ULLAH
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan
M. HUSSAIN
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan
M. FAROOQ
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
N. HAIDER
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan
B. S. CHAUHAN
Affiliation:
Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), University of Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
*
§§Corresponding author. Email: khawarjabran@gmail.com; Present address: Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Adnan Menderes University Aydin, Turkey.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this study, we compared the weed emergence, water input, water saving, water productivity, panicle sterility, yield outputs and economic returns of transplanting with alternate wetting and drying (TRAWD) and dry direct seeding (DSR) with transplanting under continuous flooding (TRCF) using three fine-grain rice cultivars: Super Basmati; Basmati 2000; and Shaheen Basmati. Higher weed infestation was recorded in DSR than in TRCF and TRAWD. Raising rice as TRAWD and DSR had considerable water savings but a lower grain yield than TRCF. High panicle sterility was primarily responsible for low grain yield in TRAWD and DSR systems. Nonetheless, water productivity was better in DSR and TRAWD than TRCF. Shaheen Basmati in the DSR system and Basmati 2000 in TRCF fetched the highest economic returns during 2008 and 2009, respectively. In conclusion, fine-grain rice cultivars can be grown in water-saving production systems (e.g. TRAWD and DSR); however, these water-saving production systems might incur a yield penalty.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , October 2015 , pp. 567 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akbar, N., Ehsanullah Jabran, K. and Ali, M. A. (2011). Weed management improves yield and quality of direct seeded rice. Australina Journal of Crop Science 5:688–694.Google Scholar
Awan, M. I., Bastiaans, L., van Oort, P., Ahmad, R., Ashraf, M. Y. and Meinke, H. (2014). Nitrogen use and crop performance of rice under aerobic conditions in a semiarid subtropical environment. Agronomy Journal 106:199–211.Google Scholar
Bertholdsson, N. O. (2010). Breeding spring wheat for improved allelopathic potential. Weed Research 50:49–57.Google Scholar
Bhushan, L., Ladha, J. K., Gupta, R. K., Singh, S, Tirol-Padre, A., Saharawat, Y. S. and Pathak, H. (2007). Saving of water and labor in a rice–wheat system with no-tillage and direct seeding technologies. Agronomy Journal 99:1288–1296.Google Scholar
Bouman, B. A. M., Humphreys, E., Tuong, T. P. and Barker, R. (2007). Rice and water. Advances in Agronomy 92:187–237.Google Scholar
Bouman, B. A. M., Peng, S., Castaneda, A. R. and Visperas, R. M. (2005). Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems. Agricultural Water Management 74:87–105.Google Scholar
Brown, K., Bettink, K., Paczkowska, G., Cullity, J., Region, S. and French, S. (2011). Techniques for mapping weed distribution and cover in Bushland and Wetlands. SOP No: 22.1. Geographic Information Services, Department of Environment and Conservation, The Government of Western Australia, 1–20.Google Scholar
Byerlee, D. (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer's Recommendations, an Economic Training Manual, Mexico: Centro Internacional de Maiz Y Trigo, 23–33.Google Scholar
Counce, P. A., Keisling, T. C. and Mitchell, A. J. (2000). A uniform, objective, and adaptive system for expressing rice development. Crop Science 40:436–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, M. (2007). Water For Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, London: Earthscan, Colombo: IWMI.Google Scholar
de Vries, M. E., Rodenburg, J., Bado, B. V., Sow, A., Leffelaar, P. A. and Giller, K. E. (2010). Rice production with less irrigation water is possible in a Sahelian environment. Field Crops Research 116:154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehsanullah, Akbar, N., Jabran, K. and Tahir, M. (2007). Comparison of different planting methods for optimization of plant population of fine rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Punjab (Pakistan). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 44:597–599.Google Scholar
Farooq, M., Jabran, K., Cheema, Z. A., Wahid, A. and Siddique, K. H. M. (2011b). The role of allelopathy in agricultural pest management. Pest Management Science 67:493–506.Google Scholar
Farooq, M., Jabran, K., Rehman, H. and Hussain, M. (2008). Allelopathic effects of rice on seedling development in wheat, oat, barley and berseem. Allelopathy Journal 22:385–390.Google Scholar
Farooq, M., Kobayashi, N., Wahid, A., Ito, O. and Basra, S. M. A. (2009). Strategies for producing more rice with less water. Advances in Agronomy 101:351–388.Google Scholar
Farooq, M., Siddique, K. H. M., Rehman, H., Aziz, T., Lee, D. J. and Wahid, A. (2011a). Rice direct seeding: experiences, challenges and opportunities. Soil and Tillage Research 111:87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabran, K., Ehsanullah, Hussain, M., Farooq, M., Babar, M., Dogan, M. N. and Lee, D. J. (2012a). Application of bispyribac-sodium provides effective weed control in direct-planted rice on a sandy loam soil. Weed Biology and Management 12:136–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabran, K., Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Ehsanullah, Khan, M. B., Shahid, M. and Lee, D. J. (2012b). Efficient weeds control with penoxsulam application ensures higher productivity and economic returns of direct seeded rice. International Journal of Agricultural and Biology 14:901–907.Google Scholar
Jabran, K., Ullah, E., Hussain, M., Farooq, M., Zaman, U., Yaseen, M. and Chauhan, B. S. (2014). Mulching improves water productivity, yield and quality of fine rice under water-saving rice production systems. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. doi: 10.1111/jac.12099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamoshita, A., Ishikawa, M., Abe, J. and Imoto, H. (2007). Evaluation of water-saving rice-winter crop rotation system in a suburb of Tokyo. Plant Production Science 10:219–231.Google Scholar
Moya, P., Hong, L., Dawe, D. and Chongde, C. (2004). The impact of on-farm water saving irrigation techniques on rice productivity and profitability in Zhanghe irrigation system, Hubei, China. Paddy and Water Environment 2:207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, S. B., Bouman, B., Visperas, R. M., Castaneda, A., Nie, L. X. and Park, H. K. (2006). Comparison between aerobic and flooded rice in the tropics: agronomic performance in an eight-season experiment. Field Crops Research 96:252–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rejesus, R. M., Palis, F. G., Rodriguez, D. G. P., Lampayan, R. and Bouman, B. A. M. (2011). Impact of the alternate wetting and drying (AWD) water-saving irrigation technique: evidence from rice producers in the Philippines. Food Policy 36:280–288.Google Scholar
Rijsberman, F. R. (2006). Water scarcity: fact or fiction? Agricultural Water Management 80:5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S., Ladha, J. K., Gupta, R. K., Bhushan, L. and Rao, A. N. (2008). Weed management in aerobic rice systems under varying establishment methods. Crop Protection 27:660–671.Google Scholar
Stuerz, S., Sow, A., Muller, B., Manneh, B. and Asch, F. 2014. Yield components in response to thermal environment and irrigation system in lowland rice in the Sahel. Field Crops Research 163:47–54.Google Scholar
Tuong, T. P. and Bouman, B. A. M. (2003). Rice production in water-scarce environments. In Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement, 53–67 (Eds Kijne, J. W., Barker, R. and Molden, D.). Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI.Google Scholar
Viets, F. G. Jr (1962). Fertilizers and the efficient use of water. Advances in Agronomy 14:223–264.Google Scholar
Yang, J., Liu, K., Wang, Z., Du, Y. and Zhang, J. (2007). Water-saving and high-yielding irrigation for lowland rice by controlling limiting values of soil water potential. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 49:1445–1454.Google Scholar
Yao, F., Huang, J., Cui, K., Nie, L., Xiang, J., Liu, X., Wu, W., Chen, M. and Peng, S. (2012). Agronomic performance of high-yielding rice variety grown under alternate wetting and drying irrigation. Field Crops Research 126:16–22.Google Scholar