Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:43:01.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Potential Availability of Organic Nitrogen Fractions in Some West Indian Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

I. S. Cornforth
I. S. Cornforth
Affiliation:
Regional Research Centre, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of four crops of maize on the distribution of organic nitrogen in ten West Indian soils, given either lime, P, K, Mg and trace elements or no fertilizers, was studied in a greenhouse experiment. The soils were also analysed for ‘available N’ by incubation and chemical methods. Variations in the redistribution of organic N fractions during the greenhouse experiment did not permit conclusions to be drawn on the source of N used by the maize, although the amount of hydrolysable N, particularly hexosamine, amino and hydroxy-amino N, in the initial samples was closely related to N uptake. Part of the chemically stable, non-hydrolysable organic N was broken down by soil organisms during the experiment; this was increased by liming acid soils.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , July 1968 , pp. 193 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bremner, J. M. (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Cornfield, A. H. (1960). Nature, Lond. 187, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. (1961). J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 12, 562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Keeney, D. R. & Bremner, J. M. (1964). Proc. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. 28, 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, D. R. & Bremner, J. M. (1965). Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 30, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, L. K., Stewart, B. A. & Haas, H. J. (1964). Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 28, 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendig, V. V. (1951). Soil Sci. 71, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, T. A., Attoe, O. J., Moskal, S. & Truog, E. (1960). Trans. 7th Intern. Congress of Soil Science, Madison, 2, 28.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. (1966). University of the West Indies, Department of Chemistry and Soil Science. Annual Report 1966, 32.Google Scholar
Waring, S. A. & Bremner, J. M. (1964). Nature, Lond. 201, 951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacchariah, P. K. (1964). J. Proc. Inst. Chemists (India) 36, 7.Google Scholar