Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:56:08.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of leaf scar age, chilling and freezing-thawingon infection of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae through leaf scars and lenticels in stone fruits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2013

Tiesen Cao ,
Bruce C. Kirkpatrick ,
Kenneth A. Shackel  and
Theodore M. DeJong
Tiesen Cao*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Food Nutr. Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada. tiesen.cao@ualberta.ca ,
Bruce C. Kirkpatrick
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Univ. California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Kenneth A. Shackel
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci./Pomol., Univ. California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Theodore M. DeJong
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci./Pomol., Univ. California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
*
* Correspondence and reprints
Get access

Abstract

Introduction. Bacterial canker,caused by P. syringae pv. syringae,is an important disease of stone fruit worldwide. The possibilityof P. syringae pv. syringae infectionthrough leaf scars and lenticels was evaluated in cherry, peachand prune. Materials and methods. Laboratory and fieldinoculations were performed using cherry, peach and prune stemsto evaluate leaf scar age, chilling and freezing-thawing on bacterialinfection through leaf scars and lenticels. Results and discussion. Increasingleaf scar age was associated with significant decreases in diseaseincidence and length of lesions resulting from leaf scar inoculationwith Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae incherry, peach and prune. A significant reduction in incidence andlesion length was observed after 4 h of air exposure, and both measuresof infection were reduced to essentially 0 by 2 days of exposure. Prolongedchilling temperature (2.2 °C) prior to leaf removal had no cleareffect on disease incidence of leaf scar infection, but significantlydecreased lesion length due to leaf scar infection. Cherry was more susceptibleto P. syringae pv. syringae infectionthrough leaf scars than peach and ‘French’ prune. The leaf scar inoculationresults were consistent with the previous studies. The disease incidenceof lenticel infection caused by bacterial inoculation in ‘French’prune was very low, but significantly higher than the water control.Freezing-thawing significantly increased both the disease incidence andthe lesion size via lenticel infection. The lenticel inoculationdata suggest that P. syringae pv. syringae infection throughlenticels is possible under field conditions.

Keywords

USAPrunus persicaPrunus aviumPrunus domesticaplant diseasescankersPseudomonas syringaeexperimental infectionlenticelslesionsÉtats-UnisPrunus persicaPrunus aviumPrunus domesticamaladie des planteschancrePseudomonas syringaeinfection expérimentalelenticellelésionEUAPrunus persicaPrunus aviumPrunus domesticaenfermedades de las plantasnecrosis cancerosaPseudomonas syringaeinfección experimentallenticellesiones
Type
Research Article
Information
Fruits , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , March 2013 , pp. 159 - 169
Copyright
© 2013 Cirad/EDP Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crosse, J.E., Epidemiological relations of the pseudomonad pathogens of deciduous fruit trees, Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 4 (1966) 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Süle, S., Seemüller, E., The role of ice formation in the infection of sour cherry leaves by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, Phytopathology 77 (1987) 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosse, J.E., Bacterial canker of stone-fruits. II. Leaf scar infection of cherry, J. Hortic. Sci. 31 (1956) 212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosse, J.E., Bacterial canker of stone-fruits. III. Inoculum concentration and time of inoculation in relation to leaf-scar infection of cherry, Ann. Appl. Biol. 45 (1957) 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosse, J.E., The leaf scar as an avenue of infection for the cherry bacterial canker organism, Pseudomonas morsprunorum Wormald, Nature 168 (1951) 560–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, H.B.S., Moore, M.H., The control of bacterial canker and leaf spot in sweet cherry, J. Pomol. 21 (1945) 155.Google Scholar
Davis, J.R., English, H., Factors related to the development of bacterial canker in peach, Phytopathology 59 (1969) 588–595.Google Scholar
Vigouroux, A., Observations de contaminations tardives des plaies pétiolaires du pêcher par Pseudomonas mors-prunorum f.sp. persicae Prunier, Luisetti, Gardan, Ann. Phytopathol. 8 (1976) 111–115.Google Scholar
Endert, E., Ritchie, D.F., Overwintering and survival of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae and symptom development in peach trees, Plant Dis. 68 (1984) 468–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, H.R., Mode of infection of sweet cherry by Pseudomonas syringae, Phytopathology 52 (1962) 917–921.Google Scholar
Wimalajeewa, D.L.S., Seasonal variation in susceptibility of apricot to Pseudomonas syringae pathovar syringae (bacterial canker), and sites of infection in apricot and cherry, Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 27 (1987) 475–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spotts, R.A., Cervantes, L.A., Factors affecting the severity of bacterial canker of pear caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, Plant Pathol. 44 (1995) 325– 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wormald, H., Bacterial canker of stone fruit trees in Britain. III. The symptoms of bacterial canker in plum trees, J. Hortic. Sci. 9 (1931) 239–256.Google Scholar
Shanmuganathan N., Studies on bacterial canker of plum and cherry (Pseudomonas morsprunorum Wormald), Univ. Lond., Thesis, U.K., 1962.
Otta, J.D., English, H., Epidemiology of the bacterial canker disease of ‘French’ prune, Plant Dis. Rep. 54 (1970) 332–336.Google Scholar
Dye, D.W., The effect of temperature on infection by Pseudomonas syringae van Hall, N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. ser. A 38 (1957) 500–505.Google Scholar
Vigouroux, A., Obtention de symptômes de bacteriose du pêcher (Pseudomonas mosprunorum f. sp. persicae) sur rameaux de pêcher détachés et conservés en survie. Effet du froid, Ann. Phytopathol. 6 (1974) 95–98.Google Scholar
Vigouroux, A., Ingress and spread of Pseudomonas in stems of peach and apricot promoted by frost-related water-soaking of tissues, Plant Dis. 73 (1989) 854–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, T., Sayler, R.J., DeJong, T.M., Kirkpatrick, B.C., Bostock, R.M., Shackel, K.A., Influence of stem diameter, water content, and freezing-thawing on bacterial canker development in excised stems of dormant stone fruit, Phytopathology 89 (1999) 962–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, H., Davis, J.R., Effect of temperature and growth state on the susceptibility of Prunus spp. to Pseudomonas syringae, Phytopathology 59 (1969) 1025.Google Scholar
DeVay, J.E., Lukezic, F.L., Sinden, S.L., English, H., Coplin, D.L., A biocide produced by pathogenic isolates of Pseudomonas syringae and its possible role in the bacterial canker disease of peach trees, Phytopathology 58 (1968) 95–101.Google Scholar
Cao, T., Kirkpatrick, B.C., Shackel, K.A., DeJong, T.M., Influence of mineral nutrients and freezing-thawing on peach susceptibility to bacterial canker caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, Fruits 66 (2011) 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spotts, R.A., Cervantes, L.A., Pseudomonas canker of pear trees in Oregon, cultivar resistance, and effect of trunk guards on canker incidence and bacteria survival on bark, Plant Dis. 78 (1994) 907–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, W.A., Daniell, J.W., Effect of leachates from peach soil and roots on bacterial canker and growth of peach seedlings, Phytopathology 64 (1974) 1281–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, D.J., Interaction of Pseudomonas syringae and freezing in bacterial canker on excised peach twigs, Phytopathology 68 (1978) 1460–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couvillon, G.A., King, G.A., Moore, C.M., Bush, P., Obtaining small peach plants containing all bud types for “rest” and dormancy studies, HortScience 10 (1975) 78–79.Google Scholar
Hoagland D.R., Arnon D.I., The water culture method for growing plants without soil, Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347 (1938) 39 p.
Zar J.H., Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., U.S.A., 1984.
Fernandez, G.C.J., Residual analysis and data transformations: Important tools in statistical analysis, HortScience 27 (1992) 297–300.Google Scholar
Bech, K., Susceptibility to bacterial canker in sour cherry varieties: Orchard observations and inoculation trials, J. Phytopathol. 134 (1992) 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, T., Duncan, R.A., McKenry, M.V., Shackel, K.A., DeJong, T.M., Kirkpatrick, B.C., The interaction between nitrogen fertilized peach trees and the expression of syrB, a gene involved in syringomycin production in Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, Phytopathology 95 (2005) 581–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, T., McKenry, M.V., Duncan, R.A., DeJong, T.M., Kirkpatrick, B.C., Shackel, K.A., Influence of ring nematode infestation and calcium, nitrogen, and indoleacetic acid applications on peach susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, Phytopathology 96 (2006) 608–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed