Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:31:35.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of identity disequilibrium and linkage on quantitative variation in finite populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Hidenori Tachida
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Box 8203, Raleigh, NC 27695-8203, USA
C. Clark Cockerham
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Box 8203, Raleigh, NC 27695-8203, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Identity disequilibrium, ID, is the difference between joint identity by descent and the product of the separate probabilities of identity by descent for two loci. The effects of ID on the additive by additive (a * a) epistatic variance and joint dominance component between populations and in the additive, dominance and a * a variance within populations, including the effects on covariances of relatives within populations, were studied for finite monoecious populations. The effects are formulated in terms of three additive partitions, ηb, ηa and ηd of the total ID, each of which increases from zero to a maximum at some generation dependent upon linkage and population size and decreases thereafter. ηd is about four times the magnitude of the other two but none is of any consequence except for tight linkage and very small populations. For single-generation bottleneck populations only d is not zero. With random mating of expanded populations ηb remains constant and ηa and ηd go to zero at a rate dependent upon linkage, very fast with free recombination. The contributions of joint dominance to the genetic components of variance within and between populations are entirely a function of the η's while those of a * a variance to the components are functions mainly of the coancestry coefficient and only modified by the η's. The contributions of both to the covariances of half-sibs, full-sibs and parent-offspring follow the pattern expected from their contributions to the genetic components of variance within populations except for minor terms which most likely are of little importance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

Bryant, E. H., McCommas, S. A. & Combs, L. M. (1986). The effect of an experimental bottleneck upon quantitative genetic variation in the housefly. Genetics 114, 11911211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockerham, C. C. (1984 a). Covariances of relatives for quantitative characters with drift. In Human Population Genetics: The Pittsburgh Symposium (ed. Chakravarti, A.), pp. 195208. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Cockerham, C. C. (1984 b). Additive by additive variance with inbreeding and linkage. Genetics 108, 487500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockerham, C. C. & Tachida, H. (1988). Permanency of response to selection for quantitative characters in finite populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 85, 15631565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, B. S., Avery, P. J. & Hill, W. G. (1980). Effect of mating structure on variation in inbreeding. Theoretical Population Biology 18, 396429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. (1969 a). Pedigree mating with two linked loci. Genetics 61, 923940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. (1969 b). Group inbreeding with two linked loci. Genetics 63, 711742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, B. S. & Hill, W. G. (1980). Effect of mating structure on variation in linkage disequilibrium. Genetics 95, 477488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed