Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:27:26.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic basis and evolution of species-specific courtship song in the Drosophila auraria complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Masatoshi Tomaru  and
Yuzuru Oguma
Masatoshi Tomaru*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
Yuzuru Oguma
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
*
* Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The interpulse interval (IPI) of courtship song in the Drosophila auraria complex is the only parameter that is consistently species-specific among the several courtship elements examined within the complex. The genetic basis of the species-specific courtship song was examined by analysing the song of interspecific hybrids and of backcross progeny. IPI of all interspecific hybrids except two showed intermediate values, suggesting autosomal control of species-specific IPI. However, significant deviation for shorter IPI from midparent was found in thirteen out of 20 crosses. The chromosomal analysis between D. auraria and D. biauraria revealed that the two major autosomes had significantly large effects on IPI, but the sex chromosome and cytoplasm had no effect. Since no interaction was detected, it is concluded that each autosome acts additively in the determination of species-specific IPI. The common ancestors of the D. auraria complex may also have had autosomal control of IPI, which has been conserved during speciation in the complex.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 11 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

Bennet-Clark, H. C. & Ewing, A. W. (1969). Pulse interval as a critical parameter in the courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 17, 755–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bixler, A., Jenkins, J. B., Tompkins, L. & McRobert, S. P. (1992). Identification of acoustic stimuli that mediate sexual behavior in Drosophila buskii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 5, 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowling, D. E. (1980). The genetics of Drosophila melanogaster courtship song-diallel analysis. Heredity 45, 401–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowling, D. E. & Burnet, B. (1981). Courtship song and genetic control of their acoustic characteristics in sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Animal Behaviour 29, 924–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, J. A. (1989). Genetics of sexual isolation between two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 86, 5464–5468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A. (1992). Genetics of sexual isolation in females of the Drosophila simulans species complex. Genetical Research 60, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. (1989). Two rules of speciation. In Speciation and its Consequences (ed. Otte, D. and Endler, J. A.), pp. 180–207. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A. & Bennet-Clark, H. C. (1993). The response of Drosophila parabipectinata to simulated courtship songs. Animal Behaviour 45, 559–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. (1940). Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. American Naturalist 74, 312–321.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. W. (1964). The influence of wing area on the courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 12, 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, A. W. (1969). The genetic basis of sound production in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Animal Behaviour 17, 555–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hara, T. & Kurokawa, H. (1984). Genetic analysis of the interspecific difference in the bristle number of the sixth sternite of males in Drosophila auraria complex. II. The Genetic basis and evolution of Drosophila song 17 effect of each chromosome. Japanese Journal of Genetics 59, 371–382.Google Scholar
Hoikkala, A. & Lumme, J. (1987). The genetic basis of evolution of the male courtship sounds in the Drosophila virilis group. Evolution 41, 827–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeda, H., Takabatake, I. & Sawada, N. (1980). Variation in courtship sounds among three geographical strains of Drosophila mercatorum. Behavior Genetics 10, 361–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawanishi, M. & Watanabe, T. K. (1981). Genes affecting courtship song and mating preference in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans and their hybrids. Evolution 35, 1128–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M. T. (1987). Habitat differentiation and speciation in the Drosophila auraria species-complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Kontyû 55, 429–436.Google Scholar
Kyriacou, C. P. & Hall, J. C. (1982). The function of courtship song rhythms in Drosophila. Animal Behaviour 30, 794–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyriacou, C. P. & Hall, J. C. (1986). Interspecific genetic control of courtship song production and reception in Drosophila. Science, 232, 494–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyriacou, C. P., Greenacre, M. L., Ritchie, M. G., Byrne, B. C. & Hall, J. C. (1992). Genetic and molecular analysis of the love song preferences of Drosophila females. American Zoologist 32, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurokawa, H. (1960). Sexual isolation among the three races, A, B and C of Drosophila auraria. Japanese Journal of Genetics 35, 161–166.Google Scholar
Kurokawa, H., Oguma, Y. & Tachibana, N. (1982). Sexual isolation among four species of D. auraria complex. Drosophila Information Service 58, 98–99.Google Scholar
Liimatainen, J., Hoikkala, A., Aspi, J. & Welbergen, Ph. (1992). Courtship in Drosophila montana: the effects of male auditory signals on the behaviour of flies. Animal Behaviour 43, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narda, R. D. (1966). Analysis of the stimuli involved in courtship and mating in D. malerkotliana (Sophophora, Drosophila). Animal Behaviour 14, 378–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical Methods, 8th ed.Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Tomaru, M. & Oguma, Y. (1994). Differences in courtship song in the species of the Drosophila auraria complex. Animal Behaviour 47, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Schilcher, F. & Manning, A. (1975). Courtship song and mating speed in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behavior Genetics 5, 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zouros, E. (1981). The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mojavensis. Genetics 97, 703–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed