Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T20:30:52.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Classification of Igneous Rocks: An Historical Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

S. I. Tomkeieff
S. I. Tomkeieff
Affiliation:
King's College, University of Durham, Newcastle-on-Tyne.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There can be little doubt that most petrologists will welcome J- the classification of igneous rocks according to their grainsize as proposed by the British Association Committee on Rock Nomenclature and Classification (1). This classification has been incorporated in the new edition of the well-known textbook of Hatch and Wells (2) and has recently been very ably defended by Wells (3). To avoid misunderstanding it must be emphasized that grain-size is taken to be only one of the factors in the classification of igneous rocks and not the sole factor, and that the suggested limits between different grades of granularity must be taken at the present time to be only provisional.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , January 1939 , pp. 41 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Petrographic nomenclature. Geol. Mag., 1936, LXXIII, 319–325.Google Scholar
(2) Hatch, F. H. and Wells, A. K.. The petrology of igneous rocks. London, 1937.Google Scholar
(3) Wells, A. K.. The grain-size factor in classification of igneous rocks. Geol. Mag., 1938, LXXV, 417–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Kirwan, R.. Elements of mineralogy. London, 1794, vol. 1, 1.Google Scholar
(5) Haüy, R.. Traité de minéralogie. Paris, 1801, vol. 4, 417.Google Scholar
(6) Pinkerton, J.. Petrology. A treatise on rocks. London, 1811, 2 vols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Brongniart, A.. Classification et charactères minéralogiques des roches homogènes et hétérogènes. Paris, 1827, p. 5.Google Scholar
(8) Macculloch, J.. A geological classification of rocks, with descriptive synopses, comprising the elements of practical geology. London, 1821, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
(9) Loc. cit., pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
(10) von Leonhard, K. C.. Charakteristik der Felsarten. Heidelberg, 1823.Google Scholar
(11) Macculloch, , loc. cit., p. xxi.Google Scholar
(12) Abich, H.. Geologische Beobachtungen über die vulkanischen Erscheinungen und Bildungen in Unter- und Mittel-Italien. Vol. 1, part 1. Ueber die Natur und Zusammenhang der vulkanischen Bildungen. Braunschweig, 1841.Google Scholar
(13) Zirkel, F.. Lehrbuch der Petrographie. Bonn, 1866, 2 vols.Google Scholar
(14) Vogelsang, H.. Ueber die Systematik der Gesteinslehre und die Eintheilung der gemengten Silikatgesteine. Zeit. deutsch. geol. Ges., 1872, xxiv, 507–544.Google Scholar
(15) Ueber die Systematik der Gesteinslehre und die Eintheilung der gemengten Silikatgesteine. Zeit. deutsch. geol. Ges., 515–16.Google Scholar
(16) Rosenbusch, H.. Mikroskopische Physiographie der massigen Gesteine. Stuttgart, 1887, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
(17) Brögger, W. C.. Die Eruptivgesteine des Kristianiagebietes. I. Die, Gesteine der Grorudit-Tinguait-Serie. Videsk. Selsk. Skr., I. Math.- not. Kl., Kristiania, 1894, no. 4, p. 123 (actually Brögger used the term hypabyssal since 1886).Google Scholar
(18) Teall, J. J. H.. British petrography: with special reference to the igneous rocks. London, 1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19) Hatch, F. H.. Text-book of petrology. London, 1890 (1st ed.), 1892 (2nd ed.), 1903 (3rd ed.), 1905 (4th ed.).Google Scholar