Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T17:28:30.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III.—The Sea against Rivers: or the Origin of Valleys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

D. Mackintosh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a former article I endeavoured to show that the more abrupt inequalities of the earth's surface, so far as they consist of escarpments with their associated phenomena, are chiefly due to the former action of the sea. Before proceeding to consider the origin of Valleys, I find it necessary to refer to a statement I made in the last article about Raised Beaches (page 69). My object was merely to show that the preservation of numerous terraces in the Cretaceous districts of Wilts and Dorset furnished an evidence of limited subaërial denudation since these terraces were formed. The terraces to which I alluded, principally occur at comparatively low levels; and that they are raised beaches can, I think, be clearly proved. But this is not necessary, so far as the present controversy is concerned; for the preservation of terraces in gravel (more easily worn away than chalk, according to the subaërialists), which all admit are either raised sea-beaches, or glacial-lake-beaches (such as those of Glenroy), afford an equally convincing proof of the impotence of rain as a denuding agent.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 3 , Issue 22 , April 1866 , pp. 155 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1866

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

page 155 note 1 Geol. Mag., vol. iii., No. 2, 02.,1866.Google Scholar

page 155 note 2 Mr. Codrington, F.G.S., informs me that he has found made ground on the brows of several terraces of the class locally called Linchets, near Warminster. That the Belgæ or other races may have increased the transverse horizontality of some of these terraces, or may even have formed whole terraces, is easily conceivable; but that the thousands of terraces in the chalk districts of England were all fundamentally of human workmanship, is, I think, a theory involving such a series of improbabilities as to render it credible only to those who assign a most unwarrantable degree of stability to the relative levels of land and sea.

page 155 note 3 Quar. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxi., No. 84, 11., (1865).Google Scholar

page 156 note 1 Have any geologists yet particularly noticed what the sea is now doing under the chalk clifis of the Isle of Wight? From some statements in Mr. Whitaker's paper (Quar. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxi, 11., 1865) I should infer that in many places no deposit is allowed to accumulate under the cliffs, and that the “hard Chalk-marl and harder Upper Green-sand stretch out as a foreshore for some way westward of their outerop in the cliff”, so free from detritus, as to allow their even bedding to be clearly perceived.Google Scholar

page 158 note 1 Camden long ago called a hollow in this neighbourhood the Dismal Hollow.

page 158 note 2 See MrFergusson's, Paper on the Ganges, in Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xix., 08. 1863.Google Scholar