Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The extent of the glaciation in the Western-Midland Counties of England during the formation of the Chalky Boulder-clay has yet to be determined in detail. No accurate survey has at present been made of the various Drifts that are scattered over the country from Northamptonshire and Buckinghamshire on the east to Worcestershire and Gloucestershire on the west; but the observations of Strickland, Brodie, Lloyd, Lucy, and others, have made known the characters of the superficial deposits at numerous localities in and around the vale of Evesham, while the probable limit of the action of land-ice during the period of maximum glaciation has been delineated on a small map by S. V. Wood, jun.
Read before the Meeting of the British Association at Toronto.
page 485 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxviii, map 4, pl. xxvi.Google Scholar
page 486 note 1 GEOL. MAG. 1897, p. 321:Google Scholar abridgment of article on Englacial Drift in Technology Quarterly, vol. ix, Boston.Google Scholar
page 486 note 2 H. B. W., , “Jurassic Rocks of Britain,” vol. iv, p. 422.Google Scholar
page 487 note 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxvi, p. 224,Google Scholar and GEOL. MAO. 1870, p. 18.Google Scholar
page 487 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxiii, p. 209,Google Scholar and Rep. Brit. Assoc. for 1865, p. 49.Google Scholar
page 487 note 3 Proc. Warwickshire Nat. Club for 1884, 1885, p. 32.Google Scholar
page 487 note 4 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxvi, pp. 205–6.Google Scholar See also A. H. W. Ingram, ibid., xxxv, p. 678.
page 487 note 5 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. ix, p. 29.Google Scholar
page 487 note 6 Proc. Cotteswold Club, vol. vii, p. 60.Google Scholar
page 487 note 7 Trans. Geol. Soc., vol. v, p. 518;Google Scholar Reliq. Diluv., 1823, p. 250.Google Scholar
page 488 note 1 Proc. Cotteswold Club, vol. v, p. 43.Google Scholar
page 488 note 2 Proc. Cotteswold Club, vol. vi, p. 150;Google Scholar see also H. B. W., , “Jurassic Rocks of Britain,” vol. iv, pp. 462–3.Google Scholar
page 488 note 3 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xlviii, p. 314.Google Scholar
page 489 note 1 See “Recent Glacial Studies in Greenland”: Bull. Geol. Soc. America, vol. vi, p. 199.Google Scholar
page 489 note 2 GEOL., MAG. 1896, pp. 455, 463.Google Scholar
page 489 note 3 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxi, p. 55;Google Scholar and Trans. Cumberland Assoc., No. 11, 1887, p. 111.Google Scholar
page 489 note 4 Reid, , “Geology of Cromer,” p. 90;Google Scholar Lamplugh, , GEOL. MAG. 1890, p. 67.Google Scholar
page 490 note 1 Dakyns, J. R., GEOL. MAG. 1875, p. 169.Google Scholar
page 491 note 1 See Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxvi, pp. 482–90; and vol. xxxviii, p. 667.Google Scholar
page 491 note 2 “Jurassic Rocks of Britain,” vol. iii, p. 277.Google Scholar
page 491 note 3 Ibid., vol. iv, p. 397; and GEOL. MAG. 1897, p. 103.Google Scholar
page 491 note 4 “A Sketch of the Geology of Leicestershire and Rutland,” 1877, p. 45.Google Scholar
page 491 note 5 Proc. Birmingham Phil. Soc., vol. iii, p. 213.Google Scholar
page 492 note 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxvi, pp. 194, 196;Google Scholar and Rep. Rugby Nat. Hist. Soc. for 1869, p. 30.Google Scholar
page 492 note 2 Proc. Birmingham Nat. Hist. Soc. for 1870, p. 63. The labours of Mr. W. J. Harrison in preparing a bibliography of Midland Glaciology were thus appreciated. Mr. Harrison has since published a similar work for Nortolk.Google Scholar
page 492 note 3 H. B. W., , “Jurassic Rocks of Britain,” vol. iii, p. 146, 150.Google Scholar
page 492 note 4 Proc. Geol. Soc., vol. iii, p. 314.Google Scholar
page 493 note 1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxvi, pp. 205–6.Google Scholar See also paper on Gravels by White, H. J. Osborne: Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xv, p. 157.Google Scholar
page 493 note 2 “Geology of Stowmarket,” by W. Whitaker and others, p. 9; “Geology of Bury St. Edmunds and Newmarket,” by Bennett, F. J. and Blake, J. H., p. 11;Google Scholar “Geology of Norwich,” by Woodward, H. B., p. 112.Google Scholar
page 493 note 3 See Ann. Report of Director-General of Geol. Survey for 1896, p. 79.Google Scholar
page 494 note 1 GEOL. MAG. 1887, p. 262, Fig. 1.Google Scholar
page 494 note 2 “Geology of Stowmarket,” pp. 9, 10.Google Scholar
page 495 note 1 “Geology of Cromer,” pp. 111–117.Google Scholar
page 495 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxv, p. 106Google Scholar (Proc); “Geology of Norwich,” p. 135;Google Scholar “Geology of Fakenham,” etc., p. 22.Google Scholar
page 495 note 3 Proc. Geol. Assoc., Vol. xiii, p. 356.Google Scholar
page 495 note 4 “Geology of Rutland,” etc., pp. 246–7.Google Scholar
page 495 note 5 Report of Director-General of Geol. Survey for 1892, p. 249.Google Scholar
page 495 note 6 GEOL. MAG. 1897, p. 57.Google Scholar
page 495 note 7 Report of Director-General of Geol. Survey for 1894, p. 275.Google Scholar
page 496 note 1 See also Reade, T. M., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxviii, p. 232,Google Scholar and Cole, G. A. J., GEOL. MAG. 1895, p. 553.Google Scholar
page 496 note 2 See discussion on paper by DrHicks, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xlvii, p. 583.Google Scholar