^{page 434 note 1} Elephas primigenius, which is quoted as occurring in Barnfield pit, is really E. antiquus, the elephant characteristic of Chellean deposits

^{page 434 note 2} The statement that this molluse is also found at Crayford depends upon an erroneous determination.

^{page 435 note 1} Kennard, A.S. & Woodward, B.B., 1905. “The Extinct Postpliocene Non-marine Mollusca of the South of England”: S. E. Nat., 1905, pp. 14–24.Google Scholar

^{page 436 note 1} Brice Higgins, R., 01 1914. “Flint Implements of Moustier type and associated Mammalian Remains from the Crayford Brick-earths”; with a note by Smith, R.A.: Man, vol. 14, pp. 4–8.Google Scholar

^{page 436 note 2} Commont, V., 1912. “Moustérien à faune chaude dans la vallée de la Somme à Moutières-les-Amiens;” Congr. internat. Anthrop. Arch. préhist., Genève, p. 291.Google Scholar

^{page 436 note 3} de Puydt, Marcel, Nandrin, J. H., & Servain, J., 1913. “Le gisement de Sainte-Walburge dans le limon hesbayen”: Liége Paléolithique, Liége.Google Scholar

Since this paper was written the author has visited the well-known locality Rickmansworth. At the bottom of the old river-gravel, 18–19 feet thick and only a few inches above the Chalk, are here found Chellean, Acheulian, and early, primitive Mousterian, all pre-glacial. This is therefore a new locality for “Mousterian with warm fauna”.

^{page 436 note 4} Warren, S.H., 1912. “On a Late Glacial Stage in the Valley of the River Lea, subsequent to the epoch of river-drift man”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 68, pp. 213–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 436 note 5} Here and in the following pages the usual term ‘late-glacial’ is used for the last glacial deposits in Southern England. This term, however, is correct only when applied locally, for if these deposits are considered in connexion with all the deposits of the Ice Age they cannot be described as really late-glacial, the true late-glacial deposits being much later. This question of terminology will be reverted to later on.

^{page 437 note 1} Woodward, H. B., 1909. The Geology of the London District (Mem. Geol. Surv. England and Wales), see p. 74.Google Scholar

^{page 437 note 2} See the Geological Survey drift maps and memoirs, to which reference may also be made for the following account of the Pleistocene deposits in Southern England.

^{page 438 note 1} Dollfus, G.F., 1884. “Le terrain quaternaire d'Ostende et le Corbicula fluminalis”: Ann. Soc. malac. Belgique, tome 19, pp. 28–54.Google Scholar

^{page 438 note 2} The depth in the other localities is less: 12·2–24·9 and 14·8–21·5 metres.

^{page 438 note 3} Godwin-Austen, R., 1857. “On the Newer Tertiary Deposits of the Sussex Coast”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 13, pp. 40–72, see p. 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 438 note 4} Prestwich, J., 1865. “Additional Observations on the Raised Beach of Sangatte, etc.”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 21, pp. 440–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 439 note 1} Godwin-Austen, R. A. C., 1866. “On the Kainozoic Formations of Belgium”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 22, pp. 228–85, see p. 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 439 note 2} Bigot, A., 1897. “Sur les dépôts pleistocènes et actuels du littoral de la basse Normandie”: C.R. Acad. sci. Paris, tome 125, pp. 380–2.Google Scholar

^{page 439 note 3} Prestwich, J., 1892. “The Raised Beach and ‘Head’ or Rubble-Drift of the South of England, etc.”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 48, pp. 263–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 439 note 4} Strahan, A.et alii 1907. Mem. Geol. Surv. England and Wales, Expl. Sheet 247, Swansea, see p.118.Google Scholar

^{page 439 note 5} Smith, Reginald A., 1915. “Prehistoric Problems in Geology”: Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. 26, pp. 1–20, see p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 439 note 6} Prestwich, J., 1851. “On the Drift at Sangatte Cliff near Calsis”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 7, pp. 274–8, see p. 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 439 note 7} Prestwich, J., 1894. “On the Evidences of a Submergence of Western Europe, etc.”: Phil. Trans., vol. 184, pp. 903–38,CrossRefGoogle Scholar see p. 910.

The Chellean finds from the low-water beach at Havre belong, on the other hand, to an earlier period, namely, that of the elevation of the land. SeeBull, . Soc. amis sci. nat. Bouen, vol. 34, pp. 129–93, 1898.Google Scholar

^{page 440 note 1} Prestwich, J., 1859. “On the Westward Extension of the old Raised Beach of Brighton, etc.”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 15, pp. 215–52, see p. 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 441 note 1} Reid, C. & Reid, E. M., 1904. “On a probable Palæolithic Floor at Prah Sands (Cornwall)”: Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 60, pp. 106–61, see p. 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 441 note 2} Barrow, G., 1906. Mem. Geol. Surv.England and Wales, Expl. Sheets 357 and 360,“Isles of Scilly,”see pp. 27–8.Google Scholar

^{page 442 note 1} Prestwich, J., op. cit., 1851, p. 275 (the section), and op. cit., 1865, p. 442.Google Scholar

^{page 442 note 2} Ladrière, J., 1891. “Etude stratigraphique du terrain quaternaire du Nord de la France”: Ann. Soc. géol. Nord, tome 18, pp. 205–57, see p. 212.Google Scholar

^{page 442 note 3} Barrois, C., 1897. “Note sur l'extension du limon quaternaire en Bretagne”: Ann. Soc. géol. Nord, tome 26, pp. 33–44, see p. 39.Google Scholar

^{page 442 note 4} Collenette, A., 1893. “The Raised Beaches, Cliff and Rubble-heads of Guernsey”: Trans. Guernsey Soc. Nat. Sci., 1892, pp. 219–93.Google Scholar

^{page 443 note 1} Rutot, A., 1908. “Les deux grandes provinces quaternaires de la France”: Bull. Soc. préhist. France, 1908, p. 8.Google Scholar

^{page 443 note 2} Prestwich, J., op. cit., 1851, p. 276.Google Scholar