Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:11:32.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—The Geological History of South Africa1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

F. H. Hatch
F. H. Hatch
Affiliation:
President of the Geological Society of South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The subject of this address is a brief acount of the succession, thickness, and geological history of the South African, and more especially of the Transvaal, formations. The information necessary for such an account is of course very incomplete, but in broad outline the succession is now known, and some speculation as to the physical conditions that prevailed during the building up of the region may perhaps be permitted. I propose to deal with the period of the geological history of this country that came to an end with the close of Karroo times. The Karroo period ends with the Stormberg rocks (Rhæitic), and since that time South Africa has, with the exception of a small coastal area, been a land surface, and the rocks have consequently been exposed uninterruptedly to the forces of denudation.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , March 1906 , pp. 97 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Presidential Address delivered by Dr. F. H. Hath to the Geological Society of South Africa, 29th January, 1906.

References

page 98 note 1 Molengraaff, Discussion on DrCorstorphine's, paper “The Age of the Central South African Coalfield”: Trans. Geol. Soc. s. Afr., vol. vi (1903), p. 45.Google Scholar

page 99 note 1 Kynaston, , “Geology of the Transvaal and Orange River Colony”: Science in South Africa (1905), p. 298.Google Scholar

page 99 note 2 Seward, : Q. J. G. S., 1897, p. 322.Google Scholar

page 99 note 3 Feistmantel, , “Üebersichtliche Darstellung der gelogisch - palæontologischen Verhältnisse Süd - afrikas”: Abhandlungen d. königl. böhm. Ges. D. Wiss., Folge vii, Band 3; Prague, 1889.Google Scholar

page 99 note 4 Seward, ; Q. J. G. S., 1897, p. 322.Google Scholar

page 99 note 5 Transvaal Geological Survey Report, 1904, p. 18.

page 99 note 6 Corstorphine, G. S., “The Geological Relation of the Old Granite to the Witwatersrand Series”: Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., vol. vii (1904), pp. 9–12.Google Scholar

page 100 note 1 Dörffel, D., “Note on the Geoogical Position of the Basement Granite”: Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., vol. vi (1903), pp. 104–105.Google Scholar

page 100 note 2 Mennell, F. P., “The Bank Formation of Rhodesia”: Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., vol. viii (1905), p. 82.Google Scholar

page 101 note 1 Viot, F. W., “Geneiss Formation on the Limpopo”: Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., vol. viii (1905).Google Scholar

page 102 note 1 Hatch, F. H. & Corstorphine, G. S., “The Geology of the Bezuidenhout Valley and the District East of Johaunesburg”: Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., vol. vii (1904), pp. 97–109.Google Scholar

page 102 note 2 Hatch, F. H., “The Extension of the Witwatersrand Beds eastward under the Dolomite and the Ecca Series of the Southern Transvaal”: Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., vol. vii (1904), p. 63.Google Scholar

page 102 note 3 Thord-Gray, I., “ Notes on the geology of the Lydenburg Goldfields”: Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Afr., vol. viii (1905), p.66.Google Scholar

page 102 note 4 Sawyer, A. R., “ The Geology of the Transvaal”: North of England Inst. Min. Engineers, 1905.Google Scholar

page 102 note 5 Molengraaff, G. A. F., “Geology of the Transvaal”: Johannesburg, 1904.Google Scholar

page 102 note 6 Rogers, A. W. & Schwarz, E. H. L., “Geology of the Orange River Valley in the Hopetown and Prieska Districts”:Ann. Rep. Geol.Comm. Cape Colony, 1899, p. 80.Google Scholar

page 102 note 7 Transvaal Geol. Surv. Rep., 1903, p. 40.Google Scholar

page 103 note 1 Transvaal Geol. Surv. Rep., 1904.

page 103 note 2 Hatch, F. H. & Corstorphine, G. S.: “The Geology of South Africa,” p. 309; London, 1905.Google Scholar

page 103 note 3 Rogers, A. W.: “The Geology of Cape Colony,” P. 147; London, 1905.Google Scholar

page 103 note 4 Quite recently some lamellibranch remains have been found by the Cape Survey in the Table Mountain Sandstone, but have not yet been determined.

page 104 note 1 “Geology of Cape Colony,” p. 114; London, 1905.Google Scholar