Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:38:04.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IV.—The Late Palæzoic Alkaline Igneous Rocks of the West of Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

G. W. Tyrrell
G. W. Tyrrell
Affiliation:
Assistant to the Professor of Geology, Glasgow University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of late years it has become manifest that the igneous rocks of the Carboniferous in Central Scotland have a distinct alkaline facies. Such rocks as monchiquite, nepheline-basalt, mugearite, kulaite, phonolite, essexite, and teschenite have been described from the Lothians; whilst in the western counties nepheline-phonolite, theralite, mugearite, and teschenite are already known. There is abundant evidence, however, that in the West the alkaline phase is of later date than in the Lothians, and of late Carboniferous or Permian age. In Arran it probably extended into the Triassic, assuming that the stratigraphy which assigns certain rocks to the Triassic is correct. A general account of this connected suite of alkaline rocks, together with the lavas in the Mauchline Basin, to which they can be shown to be genetically related, is given in this paper, which deals only with rocks demonstrably later than the volcanics of the Calciferous Sandstone. The work on which this paper is based was commenced in 1908, and was assisted in 1909 by a grant from the Government Grant Committee of the Royal Society, for which grateful acknowledgment is made. An unfortunate breakdown in health, however, necessitated the postponement of the investigation for nearly a year. It is still incomplete owing to the difficulty of obtaining adequate chemical analyses, without which it is impossible accurately to determine the affinities of some of the rocks. Pending the completion of the detailed work it has been thought advisable to present this preliminary account of an igneous suite of extraordinary variety and interest.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , February 1912 , pp. 69 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 69 note 1 Trans. Glasgow Geol. Soc, vol. xiii, pt. iii, p. 300, 1909.Google Scholar

page 69 note 2 Q.J.G.S., vol. xxx, pp. 529–67, 1874.Google Scholar

page 70 note 1 British Petrography, 1888, p. 194.Google Scholar

page 70 note 2 Vol. ii, pp. 58–67, 1897.Google Scholar

page 70 note 3 Summary of Progress of Geological Survey for 1907, 1908, p. 55.Google Scholar

page 70 note 4 Ibid, for 1908, 1909, p. 44.

page 70 note 5 Trans. Glasgow Geol. Soc, vol. xiii, pt. i, pp. 56–86, 1907.Google Scholar

page 70 note 6 Ibid., vol. xiii, pt. ii, pp. 202–23, 1908.

page 70 note 7 Ibid., vol. xiii, pt. iii, pp. 298–317, 1909.

page 70 note 8 Nature, vol. lxxxii, p. 188, 1909.Google Scholar

page 71 note 1 This term is used throughout for augite with the purple-madder tint supposed to indicate a high titanium and alkali content.

page 73 note 1 Mem. Geol. Surv., Geology of East Lothian, 1910, p. 130.Google Scholar

page 74 note 1 Brit. Petrog., 1888, p. 194;Google Scholar see also pl. xiii.

page 74 note 2 Trans. Glasgow Geol. Soc, vol. xiii, pt. i, pp. 79–82, 1907.Google Scholar

page 74 note 3 Mem. Geol. Surv., The Geology of the Glasgoiu District, 1911, pp. 114–16, 132–3.Google Scholar

page 74 note 4 Harker, , Mem. Geol. Surv., Geology of North Arran, etc, 1903, p. 112.Google Scholar

page 74 note 5 Mem. Geol. Surv., Geology of East Lothian, 1910, p. 114,Google Scholar and Geology of the Neighbourhood of Edinburgh, 1910, pp. 293–301.Google Scholar

page 75 note 1 Summary of Progress of Geological Survey for 1908, 1909, p. 45;Google Scholar also Mem. Geol. Surv., Geology of the Glasgow District, 1911, p. 131.Google Scholar

page 75 note 2 Boyle, , Trans. Glasgow Geol. Soc, vol. xiii, pt. ii, pp. 202–23, 1903.Google Scholar

page 76 note 1 Campbell, & Stenhouse, , Trans. Edinb. Geol. Soc, vol. ix, pt. ii, pp. 121–34, 1907.Google Scholar

page 76 note 2 Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., vol. xlv, pt. iii, pp. 601–11, 1907.Google Scholar

page 78 note 1 Harker, , Petrology for Students, 4th ed., 1908, p. 132.Google Scholar

page 78 note 2 Summary of Progress of Geological Survey for 1909, 1910, p. 52.Google Scholar

page 79 note 1 Proc. Geol. Soc, 1911, p. 104.Google Scholar

page 80 note 1 Summary of Progress of Geological Survey for 1908, 1909, p. 44;Google Scholar also Mem. Geol. Surv., The Geology of the Glasgow District, 1911, p. 134.Google Scholar

page 80 note 2 Summary of Progress of Geological Survey for 1907, 1908, p. 55.Google Scholar This rock is called “bekinkinite or theralite” by Bailey, , Mem. Geol. Surv., Geology of the Glasgow District, 1911, p. 134.Google Scholar

page 80 note 3 Summary of Progress of Geological Survey for 1908, 1909, p. 44.Google Scholar