Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:21:26.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Magmatic Origin of the Sudbury Nickel Ores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. P. Coleman
A. P. Coleman
Affiliation:
Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Professor Gregory, in a very interesting paper published in the Transactions of the Faraday Society, has advanced various arguments against the theory of the magmatic origin of the Sudbury nickel deposits and has quoted several authorities as opposing that theory. His brief account of the subject presents, unintentionally of course, only one side of the controversy in regard to those ores, and lest the deservedly great authority of his opinion should seem to settle the question, I wish to place before English geologists an outline of the arguments on the other side.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , March 1926 , pp. 108 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 108 note 1 Trans. Faraday Soc., No. 60, vol. xx, pt. iii, 1925, pp. 449–58.Google Scholar

page 108 note 2 Wandke, and Hoffman, in Econ. Geol., vol. xix, 1924, p. 200.Google Scholar

page 110 note 1 Howe, , Econ. Geology, vol. ix, 1914, pp. 503, etc.Google Scholar

page 110 note 2 Bateman, , Econ. Geology, vol. xii, 1917, pp. 391, etc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 111 note 1 Roberts, H. M. and Longyear, R. D., “Genesis of the Sudbury Nickel-Copper Ores as Indicated by Recent Explorations”: Trans. Am. Inst. Mining Engineers, 1918.Google Scholar