Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:08:34.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Lower Kimeridgian Ammonite Genera Pictonia, Rasenia, Aulacostephanus and Ataxioceras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. J. Arkell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The four genera discussed below are mentioned in almost every paper, memoir, and monograph dealing with the Lower Kimeridge Clay in this country and abroad. The first three were given currency in the literature of the Upper Jurassic when species belonging to them were chosen as index-fossils for the three lowest zones of the Kimeridge Clay by Salfeld (1913–14). Ataxioceras, though not comprising any zonal index fossils, is almost as important and has been repeatedly cited for 56 years from all parts of the world.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 72 , Issue 6 , June 1935 , pp. 246 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayle, E., 1878. Explication de la carte géologique de France, vol. iv (Atlas only published).Google Scholar
Beurlen, K., 1924. “Die Gattung Rasenia im Schwäbischen Jura,” Centralblatt für Min., etc., 245–252, 281–8.Google Scholar
Choffat, P., 1893. “Description de la Faune jurassique du Portugal. Céphalopodes, 1,” Trav. Géol. Portugal, 1–82.Google Scholar
Dohm, B., 1925. “Ueber den oberen Jura von Zarnglaff i. P. und seine Ammonitenfauna,” Abh. Geol.-pal. Inst. Univ. Greifswald, ii, 1–40.Google Scholar
DouvillÉ, R., 1910. “Un Virgatites du Caucase occidental; origine méditerranéenne de ce genre; Ataxioceras, Pseudovirgatites et Virgatosphinctes ,” Bull. Soc. géol. France [4], x, 730–9.Google Scholar
Durand, A., 1932. “L’étage Kiméridgien dans les départements de la Meuse et de la Haute-Marne,” Bull. Soc. géol. France [5], ii, 293–335.Google Scholar
Fontannes, F., 1879. Description des Ammonites des calcaires du Château de Crussol, Ardèche. Paris and Lyon.Google Scholar
Lemoine, P., 1904. In Palaeontologia Universalis, Cent. I, no. 55.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d’, 1842–1850. Paléontologie française. Terrains jurassiques I, “Céphalopodes.”Google Scholar
Richter, K., 1931. “Geologischer Führer durch die Zarnglaff-Schwanteshagener Malmbrüche,” Mitteil. Geol.-pal. Inst. Univ. Greifswald, Heft 7. 1–26.Google Scholar
Salfeld, H., 1913. “Certain Upper Jurassic Strata of England,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., Ixix, 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salfeld, H., 1914. “Die Gliederung des oberen Jura in Nordwesteuropa,” Neues Jahrb. für Min., etc., Beil.-Bd. xxxvii, 125–246.1 Google Scholar
Salfeld, H., 1917. “Monographie der Gattung Ringsteadia gen. nov,” Palaeontographica, Ixii, 69–84.Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H., 1925. “Entwurf einer Systematik der Perisphincten,” Neues Jahrb. für Min., etc., Beil.-Bd. lii, 309–343.Google Scholar
Schindewolf, O. H., 1926. “Zur Systematik der Perisphincten,” Neues Jahrb. für Min., etc., Beil.-Bd. lv, 497–517.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F., 1925. “Ammonites and Aptychi,” in Wyllie and Smellie, “Collection of Fossils and Rocks from Somaliland,” Hon. Hunterian Mus., Glasgow, i, pt. 7, 111–164.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F., 1931–1933. “Revision of the Jurassic Cephalopod Fauna of Kachh (Cutch),” pts. iv (1931) and vi (1933), Pal. Indica, N.S., ix, mem. 2.Google Scholar
Tornquist, A., 1896. “Die degenerierten Perisphinctiden des Kimmeridge von Le Havre,” Mém. Soc. pal. Suisse, xxiii, 1–44.Google Scholar
Wegele, L., 1929. “Stratigraphische und faunistische Untersuchungen im Oberoxford und Unterkimmeridge Mittelfrankens,” Palaeontographica, Ixxi, 119–210, and lxxii, 1–94.Google Scholar