Article contents
The Rate of Sedimentation on Salt Marshes on Scolt Head Island, Norfolk
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Extract
A brief note on this subject was published in the GeologicalMagazine, Vol. LXXII, October, 1935. In September of that year certain more detailed experiments were prepared, whose object was to afford a means of measuring the rate of accretion of tidal silt on different types of marsh in various parts of the island complex. Reference to Text-fig. 1 will show that five lines were prepared. In each case patches of fine and distinctive light brown Lower Greensand were spread over the marsh at measured intervals. Sometimes the patches, each about 2–3 feet in diameter, were put down at regular distances, but, on account of the number of small creeks and salt pans intersected by any straight line across a marsh, it. was usually more convenient to make the intervals between patches irregular. The sand was spread as a fine layer in and on the vegetation, and after it had been covered by one or two big tides, it settled down easily on the true marsh surface under the plant covering. It was then only a matter of time before it was covered by tidal silt. The sand was put down in September, 1935, and the measurements of accretion were made at the end of June, 1937.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938
References
page 26 note 1 Scolt Head Island, ed. Steers, J. A., Heffer, 1934.Google Scholar
page 30 note 1 The average variation in a set of four readings was about, or less than, 10 per cent.Google Scholar
page 31 note 1 This amount (= 0.72 inches) was the greatest discrepancy on a levelled line: it represents no more than the general variation in surface level on almost any square yard of a marsh surface.Google Scholar
page 32 note 1 The levels (Table II) show that the line is rather low between stations 19 and 27. In general, sedimentation is rather higher between these stations, except for Nos. 22 and 23. Rather anomalous figures were obtained at 22, and one very low reading reduced the average considerably. This was the only station of the total number of 104 that gave slightly inconsistent readings.Google Scholar
page 38 note 1 In Steers, J. A., Scolt Head Island, Heffer, 1934.Google Scholar
page 38 note 2 The difference in levels between the stations numbered 1 on (a) Lower Hut Marsh, (b) Upper Hut Marsh, and (c) Missel Marsh are:—Google Scholar
- 14
- Cited by