Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:57:49.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IV.—On Rhynchopygus Woodi, Forbes sp., from the English Pliocene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. Walter Gregory
J. Walter Gregory
Affiliation:
British Museum (Natural History).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Echinarachnius Woodi was founded by Forbes in his “Monograph of the Echinodermata of the British Tertiaries” on two fragments from the Red Crag of Suffolk; of all the species described in that work, this has been regarded as the most interesting and problematical. As this species certainly belonged to a genus now foreign to the British or European seas, it was felt, that if its correct generic position could be determined, it and Temnechinus would indicate the true affinities of the Crag Echinoderm fauna, better than the cosmopolitan genera with which they were associated.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 7 , Issue 7 , July 1890 , pp. 300 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1890

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 300 note 1 Palæontograph. Soc. 1852, pp. 12, 13, pl. ii. figs. 5 and 6.Google Scholar

page 300 note 2 “Challenger” Reports, Zool. vol. iii. No. 1, p. 30, 1881Google Scholar.

page 300 note 3 Lovén, S., “On Pourtalesia, a Genus of Echinoidea,” Kongl. Svenska Vetensk. Akad. Handl. new ser. vol. xix. No. 7, p.86, 1883Google Scholar.

page 301 note 1 Catalogue Raisonné des Echinides, Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. (3) vol. vii. p. 133, 1847Google Scholar.

page 302 note 1 A. and Bell, R., “On the English Crags,” Proc. Geol. Assoc. London, vol. ii. 1872, p. 197Google Scholar.

page 302 note 2 Morris, , Cat. Brit. Foss. 2nd ed. 1854, p. 78.Google Scholar

page 302 note 3 Desmoulins, , Etudes sur les Echinides, 1837, p. 360Google Scholar.

page 302 note 4 Duncan, and Sladen, , The Fossil Echinoidea of W. Scinde, Pal. Indica. ser. xiv. vol. i. (3) fase. ii. 1882, pp. 68–9, pl. xv. figs. 5, 6.Google Scholar

page 302 note 5 D'Archiac, and Haime, , Description des animaux fossiles du groupe nummulitique de l'Inde, t. i. p. 352, pl. xxx. fig. 19. Paris, 1853Google Scholar.

page 302 note 6 De Loriol, , Monographie des Echinides contenus dans les couches nummulitiques de l'Egypte, Mém. Soc. phys. et d'hist. nat. Genève, vol. xxvii. i. p. 85–8, pl. iv. figs. 2–4.Google Scholar

page 302 note 7 De Loriol, , Eocaene Echinoideen aus Aegypten und der libyschen Wüste, Palæontographica, vol. xxx. (3) pp. 18, 19, pl. ii. figs. 9–12Google Scholar.

page 302 note 8 Agassiz, Al., “List of the Echinoderms sent to different Institutions with Annotations,” Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. vol. i. No. 2, p. 27, 1863Google Scholar.

page 302 note 9 Lamarck, Hist. nat. anim. Vert, S., p. 349, 1801Google Scholar.

page 303 note 1 “Challenger,” Rep. Zool. vol. ii. p. 30Google Scholar.