Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T14:33:52.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Help to the Identification of Fossil Bivalve Shells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2016

Harry Seeley*
Affiliation:
Woodwardian Museum, Cambridge
Get access

Extract

Lamellibranehiate shells are the most abundant fossils of most rocks. Numerous in genera, and prolific in species, they are multitudinous in individuals, and the specimens vary. The study is not easy. It has little of the poetry of many other branches of natural history, and has naturally received less attention. But in each subkingdom specially, no less than in the animal kingdom generally, the law holds good that the lower the organization the longer is the duration in time. And so, important as the higher mollusca are in the analysis of rocks into their several zones, it is on the lower forms we rely in synthetical arrangements. The Conchifera readily divide rocks into Palaeozoic and Neozoic,—no form with a pallial sinus being known below the Lower Secondary strata; while, from the appearance in them of numerous new genera, no class of animals better marks the recognized systems into which fossiliferous rocks are grouped. It is indispensable both to the geologist and biologist to be familiar with the genera, and it is the object of this paper to render the principles on which they are identified more easy and exact.

That genera are practically realities every student knows well; as such the geologist and zoologist have to do with them. And it has elsewhere been shown that between hosts of groups intermediate forms can no more be found, than can intermediate wood fill the space between the forked branches of a bush. Accepting the fact, the question arises,—How may genera be known?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1864

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 45 note * ‘Researches on the Homologies of the Bivalve Mollusca; and therein of the Law of Variation of Forms, and the Nature of Genera,’ Part 1, communicated to the Cambridge Philosophical Society, March 17, 1862, and remaining unpublished, pending completion. The formula: used in this paper were then explained in a note.

page 47 note * The direction of the axis might be marked by a line; thus, Lima /; Pecten |; Avicula \.

page 48 note † In this genus should be included all the fossil species called Inoceramus, excepting perhaps I. involutus, which may be left as a critical subtype, having much the same relation with Perna that Janira has with Pecten.

page 48 note * The Palaeozoic species of Nucula and Leda have external ligaments, and are regarded by authors as then forming one genus, which is named Cteuodonta.

page 49 note * A form like this is not introduced as a genus, but merely as an illustration of results arrived at by adhering to the formulae rigidly.