Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T12:01:05.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Economic Analysis of Consumer Protection in Contract Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The traditional justification of consumer protection is founded on the notion of restraining the monopoly power of huge companies and the potential that they posses to influence consumers via advertising that limits consumers’ ability to verify what is in their own best interest. This theory refers not to the individual consumer in a concrete situation, but stresses a general economically weaker position of the consumer vis-à-vis the suppliers. Consumers are seen as less knowledgeable and as economically inferior to producers and traders. So a large deviation between the ideal of consumer sovereignty and reality is presumed. The power imbalance on the market (“countervailing power”) leads to demand for market reconciliation, compensation or balancing. According to this conception the state must support the consumers as weaker market participants during the counterweight

Type
Private Law
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Keßler, Friedrich, Contracts of Adhesion: Some Thoughts About Freedom of Contract, 43 Columbia Law Review 629, 632, 640 (1943).Google Scholar

2 Hans-Bernd Schäfer/Claus Ott, Lehrbuch der ökonomischen Analyse des Zivilrechts, 321-322 (3rd ed. 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Thierry Bourgoigne, Élements pour une theorie du droit de la consommation 72-73, 128-129 (1988); Stephen Weatherill, EC Consumer Law and Policy 60 (1997).Google Scholar

4 A term created by William H. Hutt Economics and the Public. A Study of Competition and Opinion. 257 (1936).Google Scholar

5 Mitropoulos, Stefan, Verbraucherpolitik in der Marktwirtschaft 30-32 (1997).Google Scholar

6 Galbraith, John Kenneth, American Capitalism. The Concept of Countervailing Power 108-154 (2nd ed. 1956); Bourgoigne, supra note 3; Konstantin Simitis, Verbraucherschutz – Schlagwort oder Rechtsprinzip? 97-136 (1976).Google Scholar

7 Galbraith, John Kenneth, Die moderne Industriegesellschaft 195 (1973); Norbert Reich, Markt und Recht 218 (1977); Bourgoigne, supra note 3, at 6, 10, 72-73, 128-129, 161.Google Scholar

8 Beale, Hugh, The Inequality of Bargaining Power, 6 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 123 (1986); Manfred Wolf, Party Autonomy and Information in the Unfair Contract Term Directive, in Party Autonomy and the Role of Information in the Internal Market 313, 323 (Stefan Grundmann/Wolfgang Kerber/Stephen Weatherill eds., 2001); Hans-W. Micklitz, The New German Sales Law: Changing Patterns in the Regulation of Product Quality, 25 Journal of Consumer Policy 379, 386-389 (2002); Spencer Nathan Thal, The Inequality of Bargaining Power Doctrine – The Problem of Defining Contractual Unfairness, 8 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 17 (1988).Google Scholar

9 Bourgoigne, supra note 3.Google Scholar

10 Hadfield, Gillian/Howse, Robert/Trebilcock, Michael J., Rethinking Consumer Protection Policy: Remarks to the University of Toronto Faculty of Law (20 June 1996).Google Scholar

11 Fernando Gomez Pomar, EC Consumer Protection Law and EC Competition Law: How related are they? A Law and Economics perspective 8 (InDret Working Paper No. 113, 2003).Google Scholar

12 Schäfer/Ott, supra note 2, at 322.Google Scholar

13 Martinek, Michael, Unsystematische Überregulierung und kontraintentionale Effekte im Europäischen Verbraucherrecht oder: Weniger wäre mehr, in Systembildung und Systemlücken in Kerngebieten des Europäischen Privatrechts 511, 518 (Stefan Grundmann ed., 2000); Christian Twigg-Flesner/Stephen Weatherill/Chris Willett, Law, Information and Product Quality. Introductory Remarks by the Editors of the Special Issue, 25 Journal of Consumer Policy 291, 293 (2002).Google Scholar

14 For example: Council Resolution of 14 April 1975 on a preliminary programme of the European Economic Community for a consumer protection and information policy, O.J. EC 1975 C 92/1; Council Resolution of 19 May 1981 on a second programme of the European Economic Community for a consumer protection and information policy O.J. EC 1981 C 133/1; Council Resolution of 23 June 1986 concerning the future orientation of the policy of the European Economic Community for the protection and promotion of consumer interests, O.J. EC 1986 C 167/1.Google Scholar

15 Three year action plan of consumer policy in the EEC 1990-1992, COM (90) 98 final, 3 May 1990.Google Scholar

16 Second Commission three-year action plan 1993-1995: placing the single market at the service of European consumers, COM (93) 378 final, 28 July 1993.Google Scholar

17 Communication from the Commission – Priorities for Consumer Policy 1996-1998, COM (95) 519 final, 31. October 1995.Google Scholar

18 Martinek, supra note 13, at 518.Google Scholar

19 Beales, Howard/Craswell, Richard/Salop, Steven C., The Efficient Regulation of Consumer Protection, 24 Journal of Law & Economics (J.L. & Econ.) 491, 513 (1981).Google Scholar

20 EC Directive 87/102 relating to the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning consumer credit, O.J. 1987 L 42/48, amended by EC Directive 90/88, O.J. 1990 L 61/14 and in O.J. 1998 L 101/17.Google Scholar

21 EC Directive 92/96 of 10 November 1992 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct life assurance and amending EC Directives 79/267 and 90/619 (third life assurance Directive), O.J. 1992 L 360/1.Google Scholar

22 EC Directive 90/314 on package travel, package holidays and package tours, O.J. 1990 L 158/59.Google Scholar

23 EC Directive 94/47 on the protection of purchasers in respect of certain aspects of contracts relating to the purchase of the right to use immovable properties on a timeshare basis, O.J. 1994 L 280/83.Google Scholar

24 EC Directive 97/7 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts, O.J. 1997 L 166/19.Google Scholar

25 Van den Bergh, Roger J., Competition Law and Consumer Protection Legislation, in Economic Analysis of Law. A European Perspective 25 (Hatzis ed., forthcoming 2003); Gomez, supra note 11, at 12.Google Scholar

26 Eric, A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Contract Law after Three Decades: Success or Failure? 14 (John M. Olin Law & Economics, Working Paper No. 146, 2nd series); Alan Schwartz/Louis L. Wilde, Intervening in Markets on the Basis of Imperfect Information: A Legal and Economic Analysis, 127 University of Pennsylvania Law Review (U. PA. L. Rev.) 630 (1979).Google Scholar

27 Grossman, Sanford J., The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product Quality, 24 J.L. & Econ. 461 (1981); Gomez, supra note 11; Van den Bergh, supra note 25.Google Scholar

28 Gomez, supra note 11; Van den Bergh, supra note 25.Google Scholar

29 E. Posner, supra note 26.Google Scholar

30 Grossman, Sanford J./Hart, Oliver, Disclosure Laws and Takeover Bids, 35 Journal of Finance 323 (1980); Grossman, supra note 27; Paul R. Milgrom, Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications, 12 Bell Journal of Economics 380 (1981).Google Scholar

31 Baird, Douglas G. / Gertner, Robert H. / Picker, Randal C., Game Theory and the Law 90 (2nd print.) (1995).Google Scholar

32 Gomez, supra note 11, at 13; Van den Bergh, supra note 25, at 26.Google Scholar

33 Bergh, Van den, supra note 25, at 26-27; Michael J. Fishman/Kathleen M. Hagerty, Mandatory Versus Voluntary Disclosure in Markets with Informed and Uninformed Customers, 19 The Journal of Law, Economics & Organizations 45 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Hadfield, Gillian/Howse, Robert/Trebilcock, Michael J., Information-Based Principles for Rethinking Consumer Protecting Policy, 21 Journal of Consumer Policy 131, 155 (1998); Gomez, supra note 11, at 13.Google Scholar

35 Bergh, Van den, supra note 25, at 25, 27-28; Beales/Craswell/Salop, supra note 19, at 533; Hadfield/Howse/Trebilcock, supra note 10, at 50, 51, 54.Google Scholar

36 Rogers, Everett M./Agarwala-Rogers, Rekha, Communication in Organizations 90 (1976); Geraint Howells/Thomas Wilhelmsson, EC Consumer Law 309 (1997).Google Scholar

37 Martinek, supra note 13, at 520.Google Scholar

38 Behrens, Gerold, Konsumentenverhalten – Entwicklung, Abhängigkeiten, Möglichkeiten 157 (2nd ed. 1991); Stefan Grundmann, Information, Party Autonomy and Economic Agents in European Contract Law, 39 Common Market Law Review (Common Mkt. L. Rev.) 269, 286 (2002).Google Scholar

39 Alfred Kuß, Käuferverhalten 57 (1991).Google Scholar

40 Hagemann, Hans Werner, Wahrgenommene Informationsüberlastung des Verbrauchers 96 (1988); Hermann Berndt, Konsumentscheidung und Informationsüberlastung 211 (1983).Google Scholar

41 Martinek, supra note 13, at 527.Google Scholar

42 Fleischer, Holger, Informationsasymmetrie im Vertragsrecht 115 (2001); Roger J. Van den Bergh, Wer schützt die europäischen Verbraucher vor dem Brüsseler Verbraucherschutz? Zu den möglichen adversen Effekten der europäischen Richtlinien zum Schutze des Verbrauchers, in Effiziente Verhaltenssteuerung und Kooperation im Zivilrecht, Beiträge zum V. Travemünder Symposium zur ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts 27-30 März 1996, 77, 84 (Claus Ott/Hans-Bernd Schäfer eds., 1997).Google Scholar

43 Kind, Sandra, Die Grenzen des Verbraucherschutzes durch Information 442 (1998).Google Scholar

44 Fleischer, supra note 42, at 116; Holger Fleischer, Vertragsschluβbezogene Informationspflichten im Gemeinschaftsrecht, 2000 Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht 772, 798 (2000).Google Scholar

45 Bergh, Van den, supra note 25, at 25; Wein, Consumer Information Problems – Causes and Consequences, in Party Autonomy and the Role of Information in the Internal Market 80, 81 (Stefan Grundmann/Wolfgang Kerber/Stephen Weatherill eds., 2001).Google Scholar

46 Inspired by Wein. Wein, supra note 45.Google Scholar

47 Bergh, Van den, supra note 42, at 85.Google Scholar

48 Martinek, supra note 13, at 530.Google Scholar

49 Bergh, Van den, supra note 42, at 85.Google Scholar

50 Eger, Thomas, Kommentar zu Grundmann – Europäisches Verbrauchervertragsrecht im Spiegel der ökonomischen Theorie, in Vereinheitlichung und Diversität des Zivilrechts in transnationalen Wirtschaftsräumen 322, 327 (Claus Ott/Hans-Bernd Schäfer eds., 2002).Google Scholar

51 Richard, A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law 99 (4th ed. 1986).Google Scholar

52 Cooter, Robert/Ulen, Thomas, Law and Economics 273 (2000).Google Scholar

53 Cooter, /Ulen, , supra note 52, at 275.Google Scholar

54 Kronman, Anthony T., Mistake, Disclosure, Information, and the Law of Contracts, 7 Journal of Legal Studies 1, 14 (1978); Friedrich August von Hayek, Individualismus und wirtschaftliche Ordnung 103-108 (1952).Google Scholar

55 Schäfer, Hans-Bernd, Ökonomische Analyse vorvertraglicher Aufklärungspflichten, in Ökonomische Probleme des Zivilrechts, Beiträge zum 2. Travemünder Symposium zur ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts 21–24 März 1990, 117, 134 (Claus Ott/Hans-Bernd Schäfer eds., 1991); Claus Ott, Vorvertragliche Aufklärungspflichten im Recht des Güter- und Leistungsaustausches, in Ökonomische Probleme des Zivilrechts, Beiträge zum 2. Travemünder Symposium zur ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts 21–24 März 1990, 142, 153 (Claus Ott/Hans-Bernd Schäfer eds., 1991).Google Scholar

56 Schäfer, supra note 55, at 127.Google Scholar

57 Trebilcock, Michael J., The Limits of Freedom of Contract 112 (2nd print.) 1997).Google Scholar

58 Trebilcock, supra note 58, at 113.Google Scholar

59 Morgenstern, Oskar, Vollkommene Voraussicht und Wirtschaftliches Gleichgewicht, 6 Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 337 (1935); Fleischer, supra note 42, at 187.Google Scholar

60 , supra note 23.Google Scholar

61 Schäfer, Hans-Bernd, Grenzen des Verbraucherschutzes und adverse Effekte des Europäischen Verbraucherrechts, in Systembildung und Systemlücken in Kerngebieten des Europäischen Privatrechts 559, 566 (Stefan Grundmann ed., 2000).Google Scholar

62 Martinek, supra note 13, at 521, 522.Google Scholar

63 Kind, supra note 43, at 514.Google Scholar

64 Martinek, supra note 13, at 522, 526, 529, 530.Google Scholar

65 EC Directive 85/577 to protect the consumer in respect of contracts negotiated away from business premises, O.J. 1985 L 372/31.Google Scholar

66 Supra note 24.Google Scholar

67 EC Directive 2000/31 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market ('Directive on electronic commerce'), O.J. 2000 L 178/1.Google Scholar

68 Gomez, supra note 11, at 13-14.Google Scholar

69 Supra note 20.Google Scholar

70 Gomez, supra note 11, at 15; Grundmann, supra note 38, at 273.Google Scholar

71 Beales/Craswell/Salop, supra note 19, at 523; Gomez, supra note 11, at 15.Google Scholar

72 Richard, A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law 408 (5th ed. 1998); Richard Hynes/Eric A. Posner, The Law and Economics of Consumer Finance, 4 American Law and Economics Review 168, 194-195 (2002).Google Scholar

73 Gomez, supra note 11, at 15; Stefan Grundmann, Consumer Law, Commercial Law, Private Law: How can the Sales Directive and the Sales Convention be so Similar?, 2003 European Business Law Review 237, 252 (2003); Stefan Grundmann, Verbraucherrecht, Unternehmensrecht, Privatrecht – warum sind sich UN-Kaufrecht und EU-Kaufrechts-Richtlinie so ähnlich?, 202 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 40, 63-64 (2002); Grundmann, supra note 38, at 273, 287.Google Scholar

74 Rekaiti, Pamaria/Van den Bergh, Roger J., Cooling-Off Periods in the Consumer Laws of the EC Member States. A Comparative Law and Economics Approach, 23 Journal of Consumer Policy 371 (2000).Google Scholar

75 Schäfer, supra note 61, at 567; Van den Bergh, supra note 42, at 85, 86; Michael Bütter, Immobilien-Time-Sharing und Verbraucherschutz 73 (2000).Google Scholar

76 Simon, Herbert A., Models of Man 5th print. 241 (1967); Thomas S. Ulen, The Present and Future State of Law and Economics, in 2 New Developments in Law and Economics, Erasmus Programme in Law and Economics 320 (Claus Ott/Hans-Bernd Schäfer eds., 1999); E. Posner, supra note 26, at 33; Gomez, supra note 11, at 14.Google Scholar

77 Rekaiti, /Bergh, Van den, supra note 74, at 375-378; Gomez, supra note 11, at 15.Google Scholar

78 Rekaiti, /Bergh, Van den, supra note 74, at 378-379.Google Scholar

79 Nelson, Philip, Information and Consumer Behavior, 78 Journal of Political Economy 311, 312 (1970).Google Scholar

80 Darby, Michael R./ Karni, Edi, Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud, 16 J.L. & Econ. 67, 67-69 (1973).Google Scholar

81 Akerlof, George. A., The Market for Lemons: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics 488 (1970).Google Scholar

82 Rekaiti, /Bergh, Van den, supra note 74, at 379; Van den Bergh, supra note 42, at 87.Google Scholar

83 Nelson, supra note 79.Google Scholar

84 Rekaiti, /Bergh, Van den, supra note 74, at 379-380; Michael Frings, Das neue Verbraucherschutzrecht im BGB 2000, 2002 Verbraucher und Recht 390, 396 (2002).Google Scholar

85 Bergh, Van den, supra note 42, at 87; Rekaiti/Van den Bergh, supra note 74, at 381.Google Scholar

86 Rekaiti, /Bergh, Van den, supra note 74, at 382; Van den Bergh, supra note 42, at 87; Hans-Peter Schwintowski, Contractual Rules Concerning the Marketing of Goods and Services – Requirements of Form and Content versus Private Autonomy, in Party Autonomy and the Role of Information in the Internal Market 331, 346 (Stefan Grundmann/Wolfgang Kerber/Stephen Weatherill eds., 2001).Google Scholar

87 Rekaiti, /Bergh, Van den, supra note 74, at 383.Google Scholar

88 Marrinan Barefoot & Associates, Inc./Anjan V. Thakor/Jess C. Beltz, Common ground: Increasing consumer benefits and reducing regulatory costs in banking 26 (1993); Rekaiti/Van den Bergh, supra note 74, at 384; Van den Bergh, supra note 42, at 88, 94-95; George L. Priest, The Current Insurance Crisis and Modern Tort Law, 96 Yale Law Journal 1521, 1522 (1987); Bütter, supra note 75, at 73.Google Scholar

89 Rekaiti, /Bergh, Van den, supra note 74, at 384.Google Scholar

90 Ramsay, Ian, Consumer Protection, in I The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law 410, 412 (Peter Newman ed., 1998).Google Scholar

91 Rekaiti, /Bergh, Van den, supra note 74, at 385.Google Scholar

92 Bergh, Van den, supra note 42, at 87; Rekaiti/Van den Bergh, supra note 74, at 390.Google Scholar

93 Article 5.Google Scholar

94 Article 6.Google Scholar

95 Frings, Michael, Das neue Verbraucherschutzrecht im BGB 2000, 2002 Verbraucher und Recht 390, 396.Google Scholar

96 Rekaiti, /Bergh, Van den, supra note 74, at 386.Google Scholar

97 Schäfer, supra note 61, at 567; Gralf-Peter Calliess, Das Zivilrecht der Zivilgesellschaft, in Rechtsverfassungsrecht 20 (Christian Joerges/Gunther Teubner eds., forthcoming 2003).Google Scholar

98 Supra note 23, art. 5.Google Scholar

99 Bütter, supra note 75, at 71.Google Scholar

100 Rekaiti, /Bergh, Van den, supra note 74, at 387-388; Van den Bergh, supra note 42, at 87-88.Google Scholar

101 Second EC Directive of the Council of 8 November 1990 for the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions 90/619, O.J. 1990 L 330/50 on life insurance contracts.Google Scholar

102 Couter, Robert/Ulen, Thomas, Law and Economics 278 (3rd ed. 2000).Google Scholar

103 EC Directive 93/13 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, O.J. 1993 L 95/29.Google Scholar

104 Eger, supra note 50, at 327-328.Google Scholar

105 Couter, /Ulen, , supra note 52, at 279; Van den Bergh, supra note 25, at 35; R. Posner, supra note 72, at 102; Michael J. Trebilcock/Donald N. Dewees, Judicial Control of Standard Form Contracts, in The Economic Approach to Law 93, 96 (Paul Burrows/Cento G. Veljanovski eds., 1981); Trebilcock, supra note 57, at 119.Google Scholar

106 Keßler, supra note 1, at 632, 640; Wolf, supra note 8, at 323.Google Scholar

107 Joined Cases C-240/98 to C-244/98 ECJ. Océano Grupo Editorial SA v. Rocío Marciano Quinterno and others.Google Scholar

108 Couter, /Ulen, , supra note 52, at 279; Van den Bergh, supra note 25, at 34; Trebilcock, supra note 57, at 119.Google Scholar

109 Bergh, Van den, supra note 25, at 35; Gomez, supra note 11, at 6, 8.Google Scholar

110 Van den Bergh, Roger J., Standard Form Contracts, E.M.L.E. lecture slide 9.Google Scholar

111 Argument first developed by W. David Slawson in his article Standard Form Contracts and Democratic Control of Lawmaking Power. W. David Slawson, Standard Form Contracts and Democratic Control of Lawmaking Power, 84 Harvard Law Review 529, 530, 531, 544 (1975).Google Scholar

112 Adams, Michael, Ökonomische Theorie des Rechts: Konzepte und Anwendungen 123 (2002).Google Scholar

113 Bergh, Van den, supra note 25, at 36.Google Scholar

114 Adams, supra note 112, at 124; Hans-Bernd Schäfer, Entwicklung und Begründung von Schutznormen im Vertragsrecht, 2001 German Working Papers in Law and Economics paper 21 13 (2001).Google Scholar

115 Gomez, supra note 11, at 16; Van den Bergh, supra note 25, at 37.Google Scholar

116 Grundmann, supra note 73/2, at 62; Grundmann, supra note 73/1, at 251; Grundmann, supra note 38, at 275-276.Google Scholar

117 Bergh, Van den, supra note 25, at 36.Google Scholar

118 Adams, supra note 112, at 124-125.Google Scholar

119 Adams, supra note 112, at 126; Van den Bergh, supra note 25, at 35-36.Google Scholar

120 Butters, Gerald R., Equilibrium Distributions of Sales and Advertising Prices, 44 Review of Economic Studies 465 (1977); Peter A. Diamond, A Model of Price Adjustment, 1977 Journal of Economic Theory 165 (1977); Richard Schmalensee, A Model of Advertising and Product Quality, 86 Journal of Political Economy 485 (1978); Carl Christian von Weizsäcker, A Welfare Analysis of Barriers to Entry, 1980 Bell Journal of Economics 399 (1980).Google Scholar

121 Adams, supra note 112, at 127-128.Google Scholar

122 Van den Bergh, supra note 25, at 37-38; Trebilcock, supra note 57, at 120.Google Scholar

123 Trebilcock, supra note 57, at 120; Avery Katz, The Strategic Structure of Offer and Acceptance: Game Theory and the Law of Contract Formation, 89 Michigan Law Review, 215, 287 (1990).Google Scholar

124 Trebilcock/Dewees, supra note 105, at 108; Van den Bergh, supra note 25, at 38.Google Scholar

125 Schwartz, Alan/Wilde, Louis L., Intervening in Markets on the Basis of Imperfect Information: A Legal and Economic Analysis, 127 U. Pa. L. Rev. 630 (1979).Google Scholar

126 Bergh, Van den, supra note 25, at 38; Trebilcock/Dewees, supra note 105, at 108.Google Scholar

127 Trebilcock/Dewees, supra note 105, at 111; Van den Bergh, supra note 25, at 38.Google Scholar

128 Bergh, Van den, supra note 25, at 38-39; Gerrit De Geest, The Signing-Without-Reading Problem: An Analysis of the European Directive on Unfair Contract Terms, in Konsequenzen wirtschaftsrechtlicher Normen, Festschrift für Claus Ott 213, 225 (Hans-Bernd Schäfer/Hans-Jürgen Lwowski eds., 2002); Grundmann, supra note 38, at 276.Google Scholar

129 Bergh, Van den, supra note 110; De Geest, supra note 128.Google Scholar

130 Bergh, Van den, supra note 25, at 39-40; De Geest, supra note 128.Google Scholar

131 Geest, Gerrit De, Law & Economics: Contracts, Bachelor Economics, Utrecht University, Block 3, 2002-2003, 26; De Geest, supra note 128, at 228-229.Google Scholar

132 Fernando Gomez Pomar, Directive 1998/44/EC on Certain Aspects of the Sale of Consumer Goods and Associated Guarantees: An Economic Perspective 3-4, (InDret 04/2001, 2001); Juergen Noll, Legal Warranties, Adverse Selection and Consumer Protection 1 (working paper, 2002); R. Posner, supra note 51, at 83.Google Scholar

133 Francesco Parisi, The Harmonization of Legal Warranties in European Law: An Economic Analysis 8 (George Mason University School of Law, Law and Economic Working Paper Series 01-20, 2001).Google Scholar

134 Parisi, supra note 133, at 8; Noll, supra note 132, at 1; Thomas Eger, Einige ökonomische Aspekte der Europäischen Verbrauchsgüterkauf-Richtlinie und ihre Umsetzung in deutsches Recht 8-18 (2002 German Working Papers in Law and Economics, paper 6, 2002); Gomez, supra note 132, at 4-9.Google Scholar

135 Heal, Geoffrey, Guarantees and Risk Sharing, 44 Review of Economic Studies 549 (1977); Thomas Wein, Das neue Gewährleistungsrecht aus ökonomischer Sicht, 2002 Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Studien 477 (2002); Thomas Wein, Eine ökonomische Analyse der Verbrauchsgüterrichtlinie zum Gewährleistungsrecht, 52 Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften 77, 80 (2001).Google Scholar

136 Wein, supra note 135/1, at 477-478; Wein, supra note 135/2, at 80.Google Scholar

137 Gomez, supra note 132, at 4.Google Scholar

138 Noll, supra note 132, at 2; Parisi, supra note 133, at 10-11.Google Scholar

139 Parisi, supra note 133, at 11-12; Gomez, supra note 132, at 4.Google Scholar

140 Spence, A. Michael, Consumer Misperceptions, Product Failure and Producer Liability, 44 Review of Economic Studies 561 (1977); Grossman, supra note 27; Wein, supra note 135/1, at 478; Wein, supra note 135/2, at 81.Google Scholar

141 Eger, supra note 134, at 10-12; Parisi, supra note 133, at 12-14.Google Scholar

142 Parisi, supra note 133, at 14-15; Roger J. Van den Bergh, Warranties, E.M.L.E. lecture slide 6.Google Scholar

143 Spence, supra note 140, at 570; Parisi, supra note 133, at 15; Klaus Wehrt, Warranties, in Encyclopedia of Law and Economics vol. III 179, 184 (Boudewijn Bouckaert/Gerrit De Geest eds., 2000); Noll, supra note 132, at 2.Google Scholar

144 Parisi, supra note 133, at 10, table 1; Van den Bergh, supra note 142, at 6.Google Scholar

145 Gomez, supra note 132, at 6; Noll, supra note 132, at 2; Priest, A Theory of Consumer Product Warranty 1309; Parisi, supra note 133, at 16.Google Scholar

146 Bergh, Van den, supra note 142, at 7; Parisi, supra note 133, at 16-18.Google Scholar

147 EC Directive 99/44 of from 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees, O.J. 1999 L 171/12.Google Scholar

148 Wein, supra note 135/2, at 81; Noll, supra note 132, at 6; Parisi, supra note 133, at 5-6.Google Scholar

149 Noll, supra note 132, at 3; Parisi, supra note 133, at 33, 36; Gomez, supra note 132, at 19-20; Wein, supra note 135/2, at 81.Google Scholar

150 Parisi, supra note 133, at 10, table 1.Google Scholar

151 Bergh, Van den, supra note 142, at 10; Martinek, supra note 13, at 537,547.Google Scholar

152 Schäfer, supra note 61, at 565; Wein, supra note 135/2, at 80.Google Scholar

153 Eisenberg, Melvin Aron, The Limits of Cognition and the Limits of Contract, 47 Stanford Law Review 211 (1995); Challenged by Alan Schwartz and Louis L. Wilde in Imperfect Information in the Markets for Contract Terms: The Examples of Warranties and Security Interests. Alan Schwartz/Louis L. Wilde, Imperfect Information in the Markets for Contract Terms: The Examples of Warranties and Security Interests, 69 Virginia Law Review 1387 (1983).Google Scholar

154 Gomez, supra note 132, at 19.Google Scholar

155 Parisi, supra note 133, at 34.Google Scholar

156 Wagner, Gerhard, The Economics of Harmonization: The Case of Contract Law, 39 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 995, 1020 (2003).Google Scholar

157 Noll, supra note 132, at 8; Martinek, supra note 13, at 537; Schäfer, supra note 61, at 565; Wagner, supra note 156.Google Scholar

158 Noll, supra note 132, at 6, 8.Google Scholar

159 Schäfer, supra note 61, at 565.Google Scholar

160 Parisi, supra note 131, at 19; Schäfer, supra note 61, at 566.Google Scholar

161 Martinek, supra note 13, at 537; Schäfer, supra note 61, at 565.Google Scholar

162 Schäfer, supra note 61, at 565.Google Scholar

163 Burrows, Paul, Analyzing Legal Paternalism, 15 International Review of Law and Economics 459, 495 (1995); Van den Bergh, supra note 42, at 95; Gomez, supra note 11, at 11.Google Scholar

164 Hadfield/Howse/Trebilcock supra note 10, at 16; Burrows, supra note 163; Gomez, supra note 11, at 11; Trebilcock, supra note 57, at 147.Google Scholar

165 Trebilcock, supra note 57, at 150.Google Scholar

166 Trebilcock, supra note 57, at 151, 152.Google Scholar

167 Hadfield/Howse/Trebilcock, supra note 10, at 17.Google Scholar

168 Sunstein, Cass R., Behavioral Law and Economics: A Progress Report, 1 American Law and Economics Review 115, 146 (1999); W. Kip Viscusi, Fatal Tradeoffs 149 (1992).Google Scholar

169 Gomez, supra note 11, at 11.Google Scholar

170 Trebilcock, supra note 57, at 151.Google Scholar

171 E.g. Article. 13 of EC Directive 89/552 of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, O.J. 1989 L 298/23, amended by EC Directive 97/36 of 30 June 1997 amending EC Directive 89/552 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, O.J. 1997 L 202/60.Google Scholar

172 Schneider, Lynne/Klein, Benjamin/Murphy, Kevin M., Governmental Regulation of Cigarette Health Information, 24 J.L. & Econ. 575 (1981); Van den Bergh, supra note 42, at 96.Google Scholar

173 Micklitz, Hans-W., Zur Notwendigkeit eines neuen Konzepts für die Fortentwicklung des Verbraucherrechts in der EU, in 2003 Verbraucher und Recht 2, 7 (2003).Google Scholar

174 Angell, Frank J., Some Effects of the Truth-in-Lending Legislation, 44 Journal of Business 78 (1971); Ogus, Regulation. Legal Form and Economic Theory 129 (1994); Van den Bergh, supra note 42, at 97-98.Google Scholar

175 Gage, Robert J., The Discriminating Use of Information Disclosure Rules and the Federal Trade Commission, 26 UCLA Law Review 1037, 1052 (1979); Wesley A. Magat/W. Kip Viscusi, Informational Approaches to Regulation 121-123, 157 (1992); Van den Bergh, supra note 42, at 98.Google Scholar

176 McNeil, Kenneth/Nevin, John R./Trubek, David M./Miller, Richard E., Market Discrimination Against the Poor and the Impact of Consumer Disclosure Laws: The Used Car Industry, 13 Law & Society Review 695 (1979); Dennis W. Carlton/Jeffrey M. Perloff, Modern Industrial Organization 624 (1994); Van den Bergh, supra note 42, at 98.Google Scholar

177 Merkt, Hanno, Disclosure Rules as a Primary Tool for Fostering Party Autonomy, in Party Autonomy and the Role of Information in the Internal Market 230, 232 (Stefan Grundmann/Wolfgang Kerber/Stephen Weatherill eds., 2001); Robert L. Jordan/William D. Warren, A Proposed Uniform Code for Consumer Credit, 8 Boston College Industrial and Commercial Law Review 441, 449 (1967).Google Scholar

178 Supra note 22.Google Scholar

179 Supra note 23.Google Scholar

180 Bergh, Van den, supra note 42, at 98.Google Scholar

181 Micklitz, supra note 173, at 11.Google Scholar

182 Brozen, Yale, Are New FTC Policies Inhibiting Competition?, 2 Journal of Advertising 28 (1973); Van den Bergh, supra note 42, at 99.Google Scholar

183 Calliess, supra note 97, at 21; Gralf-Peter Calliess, Coherence and Consistency in European Consumer Contract Law: a Progress Report, 4 German Law Journal 333, 337 (2003).Google Scholar

184 Calliess, supra note 97, at 21; Gralf-Peter Calliess, Nach der Schuldrechtsreform: Perspektiven des deutschen, europäischen und internationalen Verbrauchervertragsrechts 10-11, recently published in 203 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis.Google Scholar

185 Rome Convention.Google Scholar

186 Calliess, supra note 184, at 15-16; Calliess, supra note 97, at 25; Calliess, supra note 183, at 337-338.Google Scholar

187 Bergh, Van den, supra note 42, at 98.Google Scholar