No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
1 Karen Kaiser, Geistiges Eigentum und Gemeinschaftsrecht – Die Verteilung der Kompetenzen und ihr Einfluß auf die Durchsetzbarkeit der völkerrechtlichen Verträge (2004).Google Scholar
2 ECJ, Joined cases C-300/98 and C-392/98, Dior and others, [2000] ECR I-11307.Google Scholar
3 Kaiser, supra note 1, at 31-46.Google Scholar
4 Id. at 497-502.Google Scholar
5 Id. at 50- 115.Google Scholar
6 Id. at 116-170.Google Scholar
7 Id. at 171-208.Google Scholar
8 Id. at 69-73.Google Scholar
9 ECJ, C-9/93, IHT Internationale Heiztechnik v. Ideal Standard, [1994] ECR I-2789.Google Scholar
10 Kaiser, supra note 1, at 118-122.Google Scholar
11 Id. at 216-496.Google Scholar
12 Id. at 218-223.Google Scholar
13 Id. at 224-302.Google Scholar
14 Id. at 303-348.Google Scholar
15 Id. at 349-491.Google Scholar
16 Id. at 218-221.Google Scholar
17 Kaiser's treatment of the issue applies to the Convention's Draft Constitution. The final wording of the relevant provisions is somewhat different, but Kaiser's key argument would nonetheless apply to the Constitutional Treaty.Google Scholar
18 Kaiser, supra note 1, at 214-215, 494-496.Google Scholar
You have
Access