² Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel, The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

³ Mansbridge, Jane, ‘Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”’, Journal of Politics, 61: 3 (1999), pp. 628–57;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Anne Phillips, The Politics of Presence: The Political Representation of Gender, Ethnicity, and Race, New York, Oxford University Press, 1995.

⁴ The current world average for the lower house of parliament is 18.1 per cent women. The national parliaments with the highest numbers of women are Rwanda with 48.8 per cent women and Sweden with 47.3 per cent women. See http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm and http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm, accessed 31 July 2008.Google Scholar

⁵ Childs, Sarah and Krook, Mona Lena, ‘Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes’, Politics & Gender, 2: 4 (2006), pp. 522–30.Google Scholar

⁶ Beckwith, Karen, ‘Numbers and Newness: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 40: 1 (2007), pp. 27–49;CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷ Importantly, this template only addresses the substantive representation of women in relation to elected political bodies. We recognize, however, that substantive representation may also occur in other sites, such as women's movements and women's policy agencies. See Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna and Krook, Mona Lena, ‘Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation’, Representation, 44: 2 (2008), pp. 99–110;CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸ Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, ‘Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life’, American Journal of Sociology, 82: 5 (1977), pp. 965–90;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Men and Women of the Corporation, New York, Basic Books, 1977.

⁹ Dahlerup, Drude, ‘From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 11: 4 (1988), pp. 275–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁰ Childs, Sarah and Krook, Mona Lena, ‘Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation’, Political Studies, 56: 3 (2008), pp. 725–36.Google Scholar

¹¹ See Franceschet, Susan and Piscopo, Jennifer M., ‘Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina’, Politics & Gender, 4: 3 (2008), pp. 393–425.Google Scholar

¹² Saint-Germain, Michelle, ‘Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona Legislature’, Social Science Quarterly, 70: 4 (1989), pp. 956–68;Google Scholar Sue Thomas, How Women Legislate, New York, Oxford University Press, 1994.

¹³ Bratton, Kathleen A., ‘Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures’, Politics & Gender, 1: 1 (2005), pp. 97–125;Google Scholar

¹⁴ Hawkesworth, Mary, ‘Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions’, American Political Science Review, 97: 4 (2003), pp. 529–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁵ Crowley, Jocelyn Elise, ‘When Tokens Matter’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29: 1 (2004), pp. 109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁶ Susan J. Carroll (ed.), The Impact of Women in Public Office, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2001; Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., ‘Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators’, American Journal of Political Science, 50: 3 (2006), pp. 570–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁷ Hawkesworth, ‘Congressional Enactments’; Lyn Kathlene, ‘Position Power versus Gender Power: Who Holds the Floor?’, in Georgia Duerst-Lahti and Rita Mae Kelly (eds), Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1995, pp. 167–94.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Carroll, Impact of Women.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Heath, Roseanna Michelle, Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., ‘Women on the Sidelines: Women's Representation on Committees in Latin American Legislatures’, American Journal of Political Science, 49: 2 (2005), pp. 420–36;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Noelle Norton, ‘Women, It's Not Enough to Be Elected: Committee Position Makes a Difference’, in Duerst-Lahti and Kelly, Gender Power, pp. 115–40.

²⁰ Duerst-Lahti and Kelly, Gender Power.Google Scholar

²¹ Chaney, Paul, ‘Critical Mass, Deliberation, and the Substantive Representation of Women: Evidence from the UK's Devolution Programme’, Political Studies, 54: 4 (2006), pp. 691–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²² Cowley, Philip and Childs, Sarah, ‘Too Spineless to Rebel? New Labour's Women MPs’, British Journal of Political Science, 33: 3 (2003), pp. 345–65;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Lise Gotell and Janine Brodie, ‘Women and Parties: More Than an Issue of Numbers’, in Hugh G. Thorburn (ed.), Party Politics in Canada, Scarborough, Prentice-Hall Canada, 1991, pp. 53–67.

²³ Reingold, Beth, Representing Women, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 2000 Google Scholar; Swers, Michelle L., The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar

²⁴ Thomas, How Women Legislate; Weldon, ‘Beyond Bodies’.Google Scholar

²⁵ Erickson, Lynda, ‘Might More Women Make a Difference?’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 30: 4 (1997), pp. 663–88;CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁶ Mansbridge, ‘Should Blacks Represent Blacks’; Iris Marion Young, Inclusion and Democracy, New York, Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

²⁷ Lovenduski, Joni and Norris, Pippa, ‘Westminister Women: The Politics of Presence’, Political Studies, 51: 1 (2003), pp. 84–102;CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁸ Debra Dodson and Sue Carroll, Reshaping the Agenda: Women in State Legislatures, New Brunswick, NJ, Center for American Women and Politics, 1991; Swers, Difference Women Make. Google Scholar

²⁹ Carroll, Impact of Women.Google Scholar

³⁰ Squires, Judith, ‘The Constitutive Representation of Gender: Extra-Parliamentary Re-Presentations of Gender Relations’, Representation, 44: 2 (2008), pp. 198–204;CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³¹ Sarah Childs, New Labour's Women MPs: Women Representing Women, New York, Routledge, 2004; Reingold, Representing Women. Google Scholar

³² Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly, ‘Gender, Power, and Peace: A Preliminary Look at Women in the Northern Ireland Assembly’, Women & Politics, 23: 3 (2001), pp. 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³³ Skjeie, Hege, ‘Quotas, Parity, and the Discursive Dangers of Difference’, in Klausen, Jytte and Maier, Charles S. (eds), Has Liberalism Failed Women? Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States, New York, Palgrave, 2001, pp. 165–76.Google Scholar

³⁴ Dodson and Carroll, Reshaping the Agenda; Schwindt-Bayer, ‘Still Supermadres’.Google Scholar

³⁵ Bratton, ‘Critical Mass Theory Revisited’; Reingold, Representing Women. Google Scholar

³⁶ Chaney, ‘Critical Mass’; Tremblay, Manon and Pelletier, Réjean, ‘More Feminists or More Women? Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women in the 1997 Canadian Federal Elections’, International Political Science Review, 21: 4 (2000), pp. 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁷ Hawkesworth, ‘Congressional Enactments’; Cindy Simon Rosenthal, When Women Lead, New York, Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

³⁸ Bratton, ‘Critical Mass Theory Revisited’; Wängnerud, ‘Testing the Politics of Presence’.Google Scholar

³⁹ Meyer, Birgit, ‘Much Ado about Nothing? Political Representation Policies and the Influence of Women Parliamentarians in Germany’, Review of Policy Research, 20: 3 (2003), pp. 401–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁰ Schwindt-Bayer, ‘Still Supermadres’.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Dolan, Kathleen and Ford, Lynne E., ‘Women in State Legislatures: Feminist Identity and Legislative Behaviours’, American Politics Quarterly, 23 (1995), pp. 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴² Dodson and Carroll, Reshaping the Agenda; Reingold, Representing Women. Google Scholar

⁴³ Swers, The Difference Women Make. Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Celis, Karen, ‘Substantive Representation of Women: The Representation of Women's Interests and the Impact of Descriptive Representation in the Belgian Parliament (1900–1979)’, Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy, 28: 2 (2006), pp. 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁵ Weldon, ‘Beyond Bodies’.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Saward, Michael, ‘The Representative Claim’, Contemporary Political Theory, 5: 3 (2006), pp. 297–318;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Squires, ‘Constitutive Representation’.

⁴⁷ Sarah Childs, Women and British Party Politics: Descriptive, Substantive, and Symbolic Representation, London, Routledge, 2008; Michele L. Swers, ‘Legislative Entrepreneurship and Women's Issues: An Analysis of Members' Bill Sponsorship and Cosponsorship Agendas’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 15–18 April 2004.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Karin L. Tamerius, ‘Sex, Gender, and Leadership in the Representation of Women’, in Duerst-Lahti and Kelly, Gender Power, pp. 83–112.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Norton, Noelle H., ‘Analysing Roll-Call Voting Tools for Content: Are Women's Issues Excluded from Legislative Research’, Women and Politics, 17: 4 (1997), pp. 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁰ Carroll, Impact of Women; Swers, The Difference Women Make. Google Scholar

⁵¹ Childs, Sarah and Withey, Julie, ‘The Substantive Representation of Women: The Case of the Reduction of VAT on Sanitary Products’, Parliamentary Affairs, 59: 1 (2006), pp. 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵² Bratton, Kathleen A. and Ray, Leonard P., ‘Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway’, American Journal of Political Science, 46: 2 (2002), pp. 428–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵³ High-Pippert, Angela and Comer, John, ‘Female Empowerment: The Influence of Women Representing Women’, Women and Politics, 19: 4 (1998), pp. 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁴ Yoder, Janice D., ‘Rethinking Tokenism: Looking Beyond Numbers’, Gender and Society, 5: 2 (1991), pp. 178–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁵ Fairhurst, Gail Theus and Snavely, B. Kay, ‘Majority and Token Minority Group Relationships: Power Acquisition and Communication’, Academy of Management Review, 8: 2 (1983), pp. 292–300.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Granovetter, Mark, ‘Threshold Models and Collective Behavior’, American Journal of Sociology, 83: 6 (1978), pp. 1420–43;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Thomas C. Schelling, Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York, W. W. Norton & Company, 1974.

⁵⁷ Granovetter, ‘Threshold Models’.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Gerald Marwell and Pamela Oliver, The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1993; Oliver, Pamela and Marwell, Gerald, ‘A Theory of Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action’, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 3 (1988), pp. 522–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶⁰ Schelling, Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Google Scholar

⁶¹ Mintrom, Michael, ‘Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation’, American Journal of Political Science, 41: 3 (1997), pp. 738–70;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Gregory Wawro, Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2000.

⁶² Kanter, ‘Some Effects of Proportions’, p. 966.Google Scholar

⁶³ Ibid.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Ibid., p. 987.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Kanter, Men and Women, p. 238.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Dahlerup, ‘From a Small to a Large Minority’, pp. 276–8.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Ibid., p. 296.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Ibid., emphasis in original.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Celis, ‘Substantive Representation’; Tamerius, ‘Sex, Gender, and Leadership’.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Childs and Withey, ‘Substantive Representation’; see also Chaney, ‘Critical Mass’; Reingold, Representing Women.Google Scholar

⁷¹ See Yoder, ‘Rethinking Tokenism’.Google Scholar

⁷² Reingold, Representing Women; Thomas, How Women Legislate.Google Scholar

⁷³ Crowley, ‘When Tokens Matter’.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ See Childs and Withey, ‘Substantive Representation’.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Ibid.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Maud Eduards, ‘Sweden’, in Joni Lovenduski and Jill Hills (eds), The Politics of the Second Electorate: Women and Public Participation, Boston, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981, pp. 208–27.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Gunnel Karlsson, Från broderskap till systerskap: Det socialdemokratiska kvinnförbundets kamp för inflytande och makt i SAP, Lund, Arkiv förlag, 1996; Gunnel Karlsson, ‘Social Democratic Women's Coup in the Swedish Parliament’, in Drude von der Fehr, Bente Rosenbeck and Anna G. Jonasdottir (eds), Is There a Nordic Feminism? Nordic Feminist Thought on Culture and Society, London, UCL Press, 1998, pp. 44–68.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ See http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/arc/classif311204.htm and http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/arc/classif311206.htm, accessed 31 July 2008.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm, accessed 31 July 2008.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ http://menendez.senate.gov/issues/, accessed 31 July 2008.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Dahlerup, Drude, ‘The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass’, Politics & Gender, 2: 4 (2006), pp. 511–22;Google Scholar Mona Lena Krook, Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide, New York, Oxford University Press, 2009.