Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:42:55.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electoral Performance by Post-Rebel Parties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2018

Carrie Manning  and
Ian Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the factors affecting post-rebel party electoral performance. We present new research tracking the participation of these groups in national legislative elections from 1990 to 2016. Our full data set covers 77 parties and 286 elections in 37 countries. It includes parties formed after conflicts of varying length and intensity, with different incompatibilities, in every region of the world, and in countries with disparate political histories. Our analysis suggests that post-rebel parties’ early electoral performance strongly affects future performance, and that competition – crowd-out by older rival parties – and pre-war organizational experience in politics have a significant positive effect, particularly for those parties that are consistently winning more than about 10 per cent of seats. But especially for parties that consistently win very low seat shares, organizational characteristics yield increasingly to environmental factors, most importantly the presence of rival parties and the barriers to representation presented by electoral rules.

Keywords

post-rebel partiespost-conflictparty developmentelectoral performancedemocratization
Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 415 - 453
Copyright
© The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Carrie Manning is Professor of Political Science at Georgia State University. Contact email: Cmanning2@gsu.edu.

Ian Smith is Visiting Instructor of Political Science at St Mary’s University, San Antonio, Texas. Contact email: iansmithgsu@gmail.com.

References

Alfieri, V. (2016), ‘Political Parties and Citizen Political Involvement in Post-Conflict Burundi: Between Democratic Claims and Authoritarian Tendencies’, Civil Wars, 18(2): 234–253.Google Scholar
Ahmed, M.A., Lodhi, S.A. and Ahmad, Z. (2017), ‘Political Brand Equity Model: The Integration of Political Brands in Voter Choice’, Journal of Political Marketing, 16(2): 147–179.Google Scholar
Allison, M.E. (2006), ‘The Transition from Armed Opposition to Electoral Opposition in Central America’, Latin American Political Sociology, 48: 137–162.Google Scholar
Allison, M.E. (2010), ‘The Legacy of Violence on Post-Civil War Elections: The Case of El Salvador’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 45: 104–124.Google Scholar
Allison, M.E. (2016), ‘Why Splinter? Parties that Split from the FSLN, FMLN and URNG’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 48(4): 707–737.Google Scholar
Arjona, A. (2014), ‘Wartime Institutions: A Research Agenda’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(8): 1360–1389.Google Scholar
Birnir, J.K. (2007), ‘Divergence in Diversity? The Dissimilar Effects of Cleavage on Electoral Politics in New Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 51(3): 602–619.Google Scholar
Bunce, V. (2002), ‘The Return of the Left and Democratic Consolidation in Poland and Hungary’, in A. Bozóki and J.T. Ishiyama (eds), The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe): 303–322.Google Scholar
Christia, F. (2013), Alliance Formation in Civil Wars (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Clapham, C. (1998) (ed.), African Guerrillas (Oxford: James Currey).Google Scholar
Day, A.J. (2002) (ed.), Political Parties of the World, 5th edn (London: John Harper).Google Scholar
Day, A.J. and Degenhardt, H.W. (1988) (eds), Political Parties of the World, 3rd edn (London: Longman). Google Scholar
Day, A.J., German, R. and Campbell, J. (1996) (eds), Political Parties of the World, 4th edn (London: Stockton).Google Scholar
Dresden, J. (2015), ‘From Combatants to Candidates: Electoral Competition and the Legacy of Armed Conflict’, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 34(3): 240–263.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2002), Redeeming the Communist Past (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Harbom, L., Högbladh, S. and Wallensteen, P. (2006), ‘Armed Conflict and Peace Agreements’, Journal of Peace Research, 43(5): 617–631.Google Scholar
Högbladh, S. (2011), ‘Peace Agreements 1975–2011: Updating the UCDP Peace Agreement Dataset’, in T. Pettersson and L. Themnér (eds), States in Armed Conflict (Uppsala: Uppsala University: Department of Peace and Conflict Research): 39–56.Google Scholar
Huang, R. (2012), ‘The Wartime Origins of Postwar Democracy: Civil War, Rebel Governance, and Political Regimes’, PhD dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, J. (1995), ‘Communist Parties in Transition: Structures, Leaders, and Processes of Democratization in Eastern Europe’, Comparative Politics, 27(2): 147–166.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, J. (1997), ‘The Sickle or the Rose? Previous Regime Types and the Evolution of the Ex-Communist Parties in Post-Communist Politics’, Comparative Political Studies, 30(3): 299–330.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, J. and Batta, A. (2011), ‘Swords into Ploughshares: The Organizational Transformation of Armed Opposition Groups into Political Parties’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 44: 369–379.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, J. and Marshall, M. (2015), ‘Candidate Recruitment and Former Rebel Parties’, Party Politics, 21(4): 591–602.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, J. and Widmeier, M. (2013), ‘Territorial Control, Level of Violence, and the Electoral Performance of Former Rebel Political Parties after Civil Wars’, Civil Wars, 15(4): 521–550.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, J. and Widmeier, M. (2017), ‘From “Bush Bureaucracies” to Electoral Competition: What Explains the Political Success of Rebel Parties after Civil Wars’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 31 August–3 September, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Kreutz, J. (2010), ‘How and When Armed Conflicts End: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination Dataset’, Journal of Peace Research, 47: 243–250.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S. (1967), ‘Party Systems and Voter Alignments’, in International Yearbook of Political Behavior Research (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
Lupu, N. (2014), ‘Brand Dilution and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America’, World Politics, 66(4): 561–602.Google Scholar
Lyons, T. (2016), ‘Victorious Rebels and Postwar Politics’, Civil Wars, 18(2): 160–174.Google Scholar
Mampilly, Z.C. (2011), Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life During War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Manning, C. (2008), The Making of Democrats: Party-Building and Elections in Post-Conflict Bosnia, El Salvador, and Mozambique (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Manning, C. and Smith, I.O. (2016), ‘Political Party Formation by Former Armed Opposition Groups after Civil War’, Democratization, 23(6): 972–989.Google Scholar
Manning, C. and Smith, I. (2017), ‘Post-Rebel Parties as Political Competitors: Explaining Electoral Performance Over Time’, paper presented at Conference on Former Armed Movements, Ideology and State Transformation, University of Cambridge, 28–29 September.Google Scholar
Marshall, M.C. (2017), ‘Foreign Rebel Sponsorship: A Patron–Client Analysis of Party Viability in Elections Following Negotiated Settlements’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, published online early, December, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717744862.Google Scholar
Matanock, A. (2018), Electing Peace: From Civil Conflict to Political Participation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Nohlen, D. (2005) (ed.), Elections in the Americas: A Data Handbook. Vol. 1: North America, Central America, and the Caribbean (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Nohlen, D., Krennerich, M. and Thibaut, B. (1999) (eds), Elections in Africa: A Data Handbook (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Nohlen, D., Grotz, F. and Hartmann, C. (2001) (eds), Elections in Asia and the Pacific: A Data Handbook (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ogura, K. (2011), ‘Seeking State Power: The Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)’, Berghof Series Resistance/Liberation Movements and Transitions to Politics, 3: 1–56.Google Scholar
Panebianco, A. (1988), Political Parties: Organization and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Reynolds, A., Reilly, B. and Ellis, A. (2008), Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook (Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance).Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (2005), Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis (Colchester: ECPR).Google Scholar
Shugart, M.S. and Carey, J.M. (1992), Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sindre, G.M. (2016a), ‘Internal Party Democracy in Former Rebel Parties’, Party Politics, 22(4): 501–511.Google Scholar
Sindre, G.M. (2016b), ‘In Whose Interests? Former Rebel Parties and Ex-Combatant Interest Group Mobilisation in Aceh and East Timor’, Civil Wars, 18(2): 192–213.Google Scholar
Sindre, G.M. (2018), ‘From Secession to Regionalism: Intra-Organizational Change and Ideological Moderation by Armed Secession Movements’, Political Geography, 64: 23–32.Google Scholar
Sindre, G.M. (2019), ‘Adapting to Peacetime Politics? Rebranding and Ideological Change in Former Rebel Parties’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 54 (in this issue).Google Scholar
Sindre, G.M. and Soderstrom, J. (2016), ‘Understanding Armed Groups and Party Politics’, Civil Wars, 18(2): 109–117.Google Scholar
Soderberg Kovacs, M. and Hatz, S. (2016), ‘Rebel-to-Party Transformations in Civil War Peace Processes 1975–2011’, Democratization, 23(6): 990–1008.Google Scholar
Soderstrom, J. (2016), ‘The Resilient, the Remobilized and the Removed: Party Mobilization among Former M19 Combatants’, Civil Wars, 18(2): 214–233.Google Scholar
Sprenkels, R. (2018), After Insurgency: Revolution and Electoral Politics in El Salvador (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Staniland, P. (2014), Networks of Rebellion: Explaining Insurgent Cohesion and Collapse (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Tavits, M. (2012), ‘Organizing for Success: Party Organizational Strength and Electoral Performance in Post-Communist Europe’, Journal of Politics, 74(1): 83–97.Google Scholar
Toft, M.D. (2010), Securing the Peace: The Durable Settlement of Civil Wars (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (1991), Nested Games in Comparative Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Whiting, M. (2016), ‘Moderation without Change: The Strategic Transformation of Sinn Féin and the IRA in Northern Ireland’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 53(2): 288–311.Google Scholar
Whiting, S. (2016), ‘Mainstream Revolutionaries: Sinn Féin as a “Normal” Political Party?’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 28(3): 541–560.Google Scholar
Wittig, K. (2016), ‘Politics in the Shadow of the Gun: Revisiting the Literature on Rebel-to-Party Transformations’, Civil Wars, 18(2): 137–159.Google Scholar
World Bank (2011), World Development Report: Conflict Security and Development (Washington, DC: World Bank).Google Scholar