Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2013
This article analyses the importance of arguments developed since 1997 by influential right-wing commentators concerning Englishness and the United Kingdom. Drawing on historical, cultural and political themes, public intellectuals and commentators of the right have variously addressed the constitutional structure of the UK, the politics of devolved government in Wales and Scotland, and the emergence of a more salient contemporary English sensibility. This article offers case studies of the arguments of Simon Heffer, Peter Hitchens and Roger Scruton, all of whom have made controversial high-profile interventions on questions of national identity, culture and history. Drawing on original interviews with these as well as other key figures, the article addresses three central questions. First, what are the detailed arguments offered by Heffer, Hitchens and Scruton in relation to Englishness and the UK? Second, what does detailed consideration of these arguments reveal about the evolution of the politics of contemporary conservatism in relation to the Union? And, third, what kinds of opportunity currently exist for intellectuals and commentators on the fringes of mainstream politics to influence the terms of debate on these issues?
2 See, for example, Aughey, Arthur, The Politics of Englishness, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Paxman, Jeremy, The English: A Portrait of a People, London, Michael Joseph, 1998 Google Scholar; Heffer, Simon, Nor Shall My Sword: The Reinvention of England, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1999 Google Scholar; Chen, Selina and Wright, Tony (eds), The English Question, London, Fabian Society, 2000 Google ScholarPubMed; Scruton, Roger, England: An Elegy, London, Pimlico, 2001 Google Scholar; Weight, Richard, Patriots: National Identity in Britain 1940–2000, London, Macmillan, 2002 Google Scholar; Hazell, Robert (ed.), The English Question, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2006 Google Scholar; Bragg, Billy, The Progressive Patriot: A Search for Belonging, London, Black Swan, 2006 Google Scholar; Kumar, Krishan, The Making of English National Identity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mandler, Peter, The English National Character: The History of an Idea from Edmund Burke to Tony Blair, New Haven, CT, and London, Yale University Press, 2006 Google Scholar; and Perryman, Mark (ed.), Imagined Nation: England After Britain, London, Lawrence & Wishart, 2008.Google Scholar
3 Norton, Philip, ‘The Constitution’, in Hickson, Kevin (ed.), The Political Thought of the Conservative Party Since 1945, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, p. 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Stapleton, Julia, Political Identities and Public Intellectuals in Britain since 1850, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2001, p. 189.Google Scholar
5 He certainly fits the definition developed in a major recent study of intellectuals in Britain: Collini, Stefan, Absent Minds: Intellectuals in Modern Britain, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
6 Heffer, Simon, Like the Roman: The Life of Enoch Powell, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998.Google Scholar
7 Heffer, Nor Shall My Sword; Hitchens, Peter, The Abolition of Britain: From Winston Churchill to Princess Diana, London, Quartet Books, 2000.Google Scholar
8 Simon Heffer, interviewed by Richard English and Michael Kenny, London, 5 March 2007. See also Simon Heffer, ‘A Tory Answer to the West Lothian Question’, Daily Telegraph, 30 November 2005.Google Scholar
9 Heffer, interviewed by English and Kenny. Scholarly opinion reinforces such a view. The English, observes Krishan Kumar, ‘always remained the dominant group in the making and the maintenance of the empire (as of the United Kingdom). Hence they could think of it, rightly or wrongly, as “their” empire – or, at least, they could take pride in what they could consider a predominantly English creation, in the sense that it was mainly English culture that was spread worldwide through the empire’ (Krishan Kumar to Richard Hayton and Michael Kenny, April 2007). Cf. ‘The other British nations clung to their national identities as a kind of compensation for, or counterweight against, the predominant role of the English in the United Kingdom’ (Kumar, The Making of English National Identity, p. 187).Google Scholar
10 Heffer, interviewed by English and Kenny.Google Scholar
11 Simon Heffer, ‘Britain is an Old Country and our Ways Deserve Respect’, Daily Telegraph, 7 June 2006.Google Scholar
12 Simon Heffer, Vaughan Williams, Boston, Northeastern University Press, 2001, pp. 1, 7, 16, 23, 30–1, 65, 98, 143, 148.Google Scholar
13 Heffer, Simon, Moral Desperado: A Life of Thomas Carlyle, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1995 Google Scholar; Heffer, Simon, Power and Place: The Political Consequences of King Edward VII, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998 Google Scholar; Heffer, Like the Roman.
14 Heffer, Nor Shall My Sword, p. 52.Google Scholar
15 He joined the Daily Telegraph in 1986, and then was appointed in 1991 as deputy editor and political correspondent of the Spectator. He subsequently became a columnist for both the Evening Standard and the Daily Mail. From 1994–5 he became deputy editor of the Daily Telegraph and one of its leading columnists.Google Scholar
16 Simon Heffer, ‘End the Pretence: The Union of England and Scotland is Over’, Daily Telegraph, 14 November 2007.Google Scholar
17 Heffer, Nor Shall My Sword, p. 57.Google Scholar
18 For many years a regular columnist at the Daily Express, Hitchens currently writes for the Mail on Sunday and appears frequently on the broadcast media.Google Scholar
19 Peter Hitchens, interviewed by Richard English and Michael Kenny, London, 5 March 2007.Google Scholar
20 Hitchens, The Abolition of Britain, p. v.Google Scholar
21 Weight, Patriots, pp. 1, 10; Aughey, Arthur, Nationalism, Devolution and the Challenge to the United Kingdom State, London, Pluto Press, 2001, p. vii.Google Scholar
22 Hitchens, interviewed by English and Kenny.Google Scholar
23 Ibid.Google Scholar
24 Hitchens, Abolition of Britain, p. xxii.Google Scholar
25 Ibid., p. vi.Google Scholar
26 Hitchens, interviewed by English and Kenny.Google Scholar
27 Ibid.Google Scholar
28 Hitchens, Peter, A Brief History of Crime: The Decline of Order, Justice and Liberty in England, London, Atlantic Books, 2003.Google Scholar
29 English, Richard and Kenny, Michael, ‘Public Intellectuals and the Question of British Decline’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3 (2001), pp. 259–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30 For an analysis of this genre, see English and Kenny, ‘Public Intellectuals’, pp. 270–6.Google Scholar
31 Born in 1944, Scruton was formerly a professor at Birkbeck College, London; but he has established his position as a leading philosopher in tandem with the roles of novelist and composer, while his frequent BBC appearances have reflected and reinforced his commitment to wide-ranging cultural and political comment.Google Scholar
32 Roger Scruton, interviewed by Richard English and Richard Hayton, London, 25 June 2008.Google Scholar
33 Scruton, England: An Elegy.Google Scholar
34 Roger Scruton, interviewed by Richard English and Richard Hayton, London, 25 June 2008.Google Scholar
35 Ibid.Google Scholar
36 Ibid.Google Scholar
37 Ibid.Google Scholar
38 Ibid.Google Scholar
39 For example Kumar, English National Identity.Google Scholar
40 Scruton, interviewed by English and Hayton.Google Scholar
41 Scruton, England: An Elegy, p. 251.Google Scholar
42 Scruton, interviewed by English and Hayton.Google Scholar
43 Stapleton, Julia, ‘Cultural Conservatism and the Public Intellectual in Britain, 1930–70’, European Legacy, 5 (2000), pp. 795–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44 See John Curtice, Where Stands the Union Now? London, Institute for Public Policy Research, 2008.Google Scholar
45 See Iain McLean, Guy Lodge and Katie Schmuecker, Fair Shares? Barnett and the Politics of Public Expenditure, London, Institute for Public Policy Research, 2008.Google Scholar
46 Simon Heffer, ‘Traditional Toryism’, in Hickson, The Political Thought of the Conservative Party Since 1945, p. 200.Google Scholar
47 Lynch, Philip, The Politics of Nationhood: Sovereignty, Britishness and Conservative Politics, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1999, p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48 Michael Kenny, Richard English and Richard Hayton, Beyond the Constitution: Englishness in a Post-Devolved Britain, London, Institute for Public Policy Research, 2008.Google Scholar
49 Iain Dale, interviewed by Michael Kenny and Guy Lodge, London, 12 November 2008.Google Scholar
50 See David Cameron's speech to the Scottish Conservatives, 23 May 2008; available at: http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=webcameron.story.page&obj_id=144993&speeches=1 Google Scholar
51 Richard Hayton, ‘Conservative Party Leadership Strategy and the Legacy of Thatcherite Conservatism, 1997–2005’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield, pp. 161–7.Google Scholar
52 Scruton, interviewed by English and Hayton.Google Scholar
53 Malcolm Rifkind, interviewed by Richard Hayton and Michael Kenny, 29 January 2008.Google Scholar
54 Ibid.Google Scholar
55 Ibid.Google Scholar
56 HC 75, Devolution: A Decade On, Minutes of Evidence, Justice Committee, Session 2007/08, London, Stationery Office, 2008.Google Scholar
57 This finding is in marked contrast to the results of a smattering of commercial polls over the last few years that report dramatic movements of opinion in favour of, for instance, an English Parliament. Such results, he argues, are very probably the product of the nature of the questions posed by these organizations; see John Curtice, ‘Has England Had Enough? Public Opinion and the Future of the Union’, London, NatCen, 2008.Google Scholar
58 Scruton, England: An Elegy, pp. 201, 204.Google Scholar
59 Heffer, interviewed by English and Kenny.Google Scholar
60 Colls, Robert, Identity of England, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61 Hitchens, Abolition of Britain.Google Scholar
62 Peter Hitchens, ‘Why I Can't Wait for it to be All Over for England’, Mail on Sunday, 2 June 2002.Google Scholar
63 Iain Martin, ‘Ending the Union Would Cost Britain Dear’, Daily Telegraph, 15 November 2007.Google Scholar
64 Richard English and Michael Kenny (eds), Rethinking British Decline, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2000.Google Scholar
65 Tony Wright, ‘England, Whose England?’, in Chen and Wright, The English Question, p. 7.Google Scholar
66 Andrew Marr to Richard English, 4 July 2007.Google Scholar
67 Aughey, Nationalism, p. 17.Google Scholar
68 English, Richard, Armed Struggle: The History of the IRA, London, Macmillan, 2003, pp. 285–389.Google Scholar
69 Aughey, Nationalism, p. 48.Google Scholar
70 Mitchell, James, Devolution in the UK, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2009, pp. 225–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71 Weight, Patriots, p. 730.Google Scholar
72 Devine, Tom M., ‘The Break-Up of Britain? Scotland and the End of Empire’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 16 (2006), pp. 163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73 Nairn, Tom, After Britain: New Labour and the Return of Scotland, London, Granta Books, 2000.Google Scholar
74 Andrew Gamble, ‘Gordon Brown and the Reinvention of Britishness’, paper presented to the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Boston, 29 August 2008.Google Scholar
75 Gerri Peev, ‘Brown: Banking Crisis Has Proved Case for Union’, Scotsman, 15 October 2008, at http://heritage.scotsman.com/labourparty/Brown-Banking-crisishas-proved.4591680.jp Google Scholar
76 Stapleton, Julia, ‘England and Englishness’, in Flinders, Matthew, Gamble, Andrew, Hay, Colin and Kenny, Michael (eds), The Oxford Handbook of British Politics, Oxford, Oxford University Press, forthcoming, 2009.Google Scholar
77 Scruton, England: An Elegy, p. 248.Google Scholar
78 Ibid., p. viii.Google Scholar
79 Scruton, interviewed by English and Hayton.Google Scholar
80 For a fuller analysis of this tension see Kenny, Michael, ‘Commentary: Taking the Temperature of the UK's Political Elite’, Parliamentary Affairs, 62 (2009), pp. 149–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar