Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:37:02.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Interweaving of Foreign and Domestic Policy‐Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Geraint Parry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

These Words Spoken By President Clinton At His Inauguration on 20 January 1993 can usefully serve as a leitmotif for the present issue of the journal Government and Opposition. The issue is itself the outcome of a conference organized by the journal and the Department of Government of the University of Manchester. The theme was the ‘Influences of Domestic and International Factors on Processes of Policy-Making’. However, this title does not quite catch the interactive quality of the phenomenon which the group was seeking to examine. Increasingly, it has been contended, policies at the domestic level whether in what we once called the first, second or third worlds are being profoundly influenced by international or ‘global’ considerations. But it is also the case that international agreements are being accommodated to the sensitivities of the domestic politics of the partners.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , 01 April 1993 , pp. 143 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The conference was held at Holly Royde College, University of Manchester 12 – 13 December 1992. It was supported by a grant from The Nuffield Foundation which is gratefully acknowledged. In addition to those whose papers are published in this issue the participants were: Professor M. Biddiss, University of Reading; Dr Simon Buhner, University of Manchester; Professor R. Dore, London School of Economics; Baroness EUes, House of Lords; Professor A. Gamble, University of Sheffield; Dr Philip Gummett, University of Manchester; Professor Richard Higgott, Australian National University; Mrs Rosalind Jones, Government and Opposition; Professor Isabel de Madariaga, University of London; Professor Michael Moran, University of Manchester; Professor John Pinder, College of Europe, Bruges; Dr John Street, University of East Anglia; Professor Stephen Wilks, University of Exeter; Mr Philip Whyte, Bank of England.

A summary of the discussion of each paper at the conference is included in the issue. Mr Ricardo Blaug, University of Manchester, acted as rapporteur.

2 Ashworth, W. A Short History of the International Economy: 1850–1950, London, Longmans, 1952, p. 163.Google Scholar

3 ibid., p. 169.

4 Ionescu, Ghija, Leadership in an Interdependent World: The Statesmanship of Adenauer, de Gaulle, Thatcher, Reagan and Gorbachev, London, Longman, 1991, p. 5.Google Scholar

5 G. Ionescu, op. cit., pp. 2 – 3.

6 Buzan, B. ‘Interdependence and Britain's External Relations’, in Freedman, L. and Clarke, M. (eds), Britain in the World, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 24.Google Scholar

7 G. Ionescu, op. cit., p. 319.

8 See Putnam, Robert D. and Bayne, Nicholas, Hanging Together: The Seven Power Summit, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1984 Google Scholar, and the contribution by Brian Crowe below.

9 G. Ionescu, op. cit., p. 320.

10 See Gewirth, A., Reason and Morality, Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1978 Google Scholar and various discussions by Raymond Plant, e.g. Political Philosophy and Social Welfare (with H. Lesser and P. Taylor‐Gooby) London, Routledge, 1981 and Modem Political Thought, Oxford, Black well, 1991. Also his debate with John Gray in the latter's The Moral Foundations of Market Institutions, London, IEA, 1992.

11 De Swaan, A., ‘Perspectives for Transnational Social Policy’, Government and Opposition, Vol. 27, No. 1, Winter 1992, pp. 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 On the respective roles of prudence and morality in such situations see Goodin, Robert E., Motivating Political Morality, Oxford, Black well, 1992.Google Scholar

13 A. de Swaan, op. cit., p. 46. For a survey of literature on ecological issues in the politics and international relations of the Third World see Bryant, R. L., ‘Political Ecology: An Emerging Research Agenda in Third World Studies’, Political Geography, 11, 1992, pp. 12–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Strange, S., States and Markets, London, Pinter, 1988.Google Scholar

15 See below and Held, D., Prospects for Democracy, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1993.Google Scholar

16 Amongst the many discussions of such developments see Held, D. and Pollitt, C. (eds), New Forms of Democracy, London, Sage, 1986;Google Scholar Hirst, P., Representative Democracy and its Limits, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1990 Google Scholar; Gould, C., Rethinking Democracy Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar