No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
Why Do People Disagree About Politics? Like All Naive questions, this one rapidly launches us into fundamentals. Without disagreement, there would be no politics.
Some of the answers are obvious, and all the common ones line up with popular political projects. If disagreement were attributed to error, for example, to know the truth would transform our condition. Let us review the commonest answers in turn and look at the sources of political disagreement.
1 Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, Oxford, Blackwell, 1974, Part II, xi, esp. 194e.
2 P. I., 206e.
3 P.I., 201e.
4 P.I., 200e.
5 P.I., 197e.
6 P.I., 200e. The ‘it’ here is the triangle.
7 Discorsi, I, xi.
8 The Discourses of Niccolo Machiavelli, edited and translated by Leslie J. Walker, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975, Vol. I, pp. 249 (Book I, ch. 14).
9 The Discourses of Niccolo Machiavelli, Vol. I, pp. 250, 251 (Book I, ch. 15).
10 Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1980, Ch. 6.Google Scholar
11 P.I, Part I, 602; 157e.
12 P.I., 197e.
13 As Aristotle remarks discussing signs: ‘Most of the things about which we make decisions, and into which therefore we inquire, present us with alternative possibilities.’ Rhetorica, in The Works of Aristotle, ed. W.D. Ross, trans. W. Rhys Roberts, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1946, 1357a.
14 P.I., 213e.
15 Margaret Thatcher, The Path to Power, London, HarperCollins, 1995, p. 263.
16 For an account of the philosophical issues involved in this idea, see Davidson, Donald, ‘Causal Relations’ in Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
17 William Rees‐Mogg, ‘Virtual unreality’, The Times, 5 June, 1995.
18 Gallie, W. B., ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’ in Philosophy and the Historical Understanding, London, Chatto & Windus, 1964.Google Scholar