Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:55:58.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technocracy, Trust and Democracy: Evidence on Citizens’ Attitudes from a Natural Experiment in Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2019

Silvia Merler Open the ORCID record for Silvia Merler [Opens in a new window]
Silvia Merler*
Affiliation:
Silvia Merler, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies – European and Eurasian Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Bologna, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: smerler1@jhu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the eurozone crisis, technocratic governments were appointed in several eurozone countries, becoming in the eyes of many the embodiment of the EU's democratic deficit. In spite of the central place that these technocratic governments occupy in the scholarly debate, however, we have remarkably little evidence on Europeans’ attitudes towards technocracy, and technocratic governments are under-studied from an empirical standpoint. We contribute to the very limited empirical literature on this topic by using a novel natural experiment design, in the context of the 2011 Italian crisis that led to the appointment of the Monti technocratic cabinet. We hypothesize that the effect of technocratic appointments on citizens’ satisfaction with democracy is a priori uncertain, and it depends on the balance of a trade-off between reduced input participation and increased output effectiveness. Overall, the results point to citizens’ attitudes towards technocracy being more complex than often assumed in the debate.

Keywords

democracytechnocracyeurocrisisEuropean politicsItalian politicsexperimental methods
Type
Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 301 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2019. Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, S (2014) ‘You Can Vote but You Cannot Choose’: Democracy and the Sovereign Debt Crisis in the Eurozone. Working Paper 282, Carlos III–Juan March Institute of Social Science.Google Scholar
Armingeon, K and Ceka, B (2013) The Loss of Trust in the Great Recession Since 2007: The Role of Heuristics from the National Political System. European Union Politics 15(1), 82–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armingeon, K and Guthmann, K (2014) Democracy in Crisis? The Declining Support for National Democracy in European Countries, 2007–2011. European Journal of Political Research 53(3), 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, R, Sanderson, R and Segreti, G (2011) Outcry over Berlusconi Budget Reversal. Financial Times, 30 August. www.ft.com/content/d5a93728-d2e4-11e0-9aae-00144feab49a.Google Scholar
Benvenuti, A (2017) Between Myth and Reality: The Euro Crisis and the Downfall of Silvio Berlusconi. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 22(4), 512–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertsou, E and Pastorella, G (2016) Technocratic Attitudes: A Citizens’ Perspective of Expert Decision-Making. West European Politics 40(2), 430–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, C and Invernizzi Accetti, C (2015) Populism and Technocracy: Opposites or Complements? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20(2), 186–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramani, D (2017) Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government. American Political Science Review 111(1), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corriere della Sera (2011a) Trichet e Draghi: un'azione pressante per ristabilire la fiducia degli investitori, 29 September, www.corriere.it/economia/11_settembre_29/trichet_draghi_inglese_304a5f1e-ea59-11e0-ae06-4da866778017.shtml.Google Scholar
Corriere della Sera (2011b) Il governo ottiene la fiducia: i sì sono 316, 14 October, www.corriere.it/politica/11_ottobre_14/fiducia-voto-camera_cdc2efdc-f63d-11e0-abf0-c6818ffd4921.shtml.Google Scholar
Domínguez, JI (ed.) (1997) Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Dunning, T (2012) Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, R and Stoker, L (2011) Caught in the Draft: The Effects of Vietnam Draft Lottery Status on Political Attitudes. American Political Science Review 105(2), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F (1990) Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Foster, C and Frieden, J (2017) Crisis of Trust: Socio-Economic Determinants of Europeans’ Confidence in Government. European Union Politics 18(4), 511–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L, Sapienza, P and Zingales, L (2016) Monnet's Error? Economic Policy 31(86), 248–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, J and Hangartner, D (2013) Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination. American Political Science Review 107(1), 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallerberg, M and Wehner, J (2013) Technocracy, Democracy and Trust. Public Finance International, 25 February, www.publicfinanceinternational.org/opinion/2013/02/technocracy-democracy-and-trust.Google Scholar
Hallerberg, M and Wehner, J (2018) When Do You Get Economists as Policy-Makers? SSRN, 14 January, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2191490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, S (2007) The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. World Politics 60(1), 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens, GW (2004) Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review. Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R and Norris, P (2016) Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. HKS Working Paper RWP16-026. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E (2014) The Year the Crisis Ended. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, M (2011) Four Scenarios for the Reinvention of Europe. ECFR Essay 43, 23 November. London: European Council for Foreign Affairs. www.ecfr.eu/publications/summary/four_scenarios_for_the_reinvention_of_europe36149.Google Scholar
Levi, M and Stoker, L (2000) Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science 3, 475–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, P (2013) Ruling the Void: The Hollowing-Out of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Marangoni, F (2012) Technocrats in Government: The Composition and Legislative Initiatives of the Monti Government Eight Months into its Term of Office. Bulletin of Italian Politics 4(1), 135–149.Google Scholar
Matthijs, M (2014) Mediterranean Blues: The Crisis in Southern Europe. Journal of Democracy 25(1), 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthijs, M (2017) Integration at What Price? The Erosion of National Democracy in the Euro Periphery. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics 52(2), 266–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, D and Valbruzzi, M (2014) Defining and Classifying Technocrat-Led and Technocratic Governments. European Journal of Political Research 53(4), 654–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, J, Falco-Gimeno, A and Hernandez, E (2019) Unexpected Event During Surveys Design: Promise and Pitfalls. Political Analysis, published early online, July, https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.27.Google Scholar
Neto, OA and Strøm, K (2006) Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and Non-Partisan Cabinet Members in European Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 36(4), 619–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, JS, Dabrowska, DM and Speed, TP (1990) [1923] On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments: Essays on Principles, Section 9. Statistical Science 5(4), 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P (1999) The Growth of Critical Citizens? In Norris, P. (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P (2011) Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquino, G and Valbruzzi, M (2012) Non-Partisan Governments Italian-Style: Decision-Making and Accountability. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 17(5), 612–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastorella, G (2016) Technocratic Governments in Europe: Getting the Critique Right. Political Studies 64(4), 948–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastorella, G and Wratil, C (2017) Dodging the Bullet: How Crises Trigger Technocrat-Led Governments. European Journal of Political Research 57(2), 450–472.Google Scholar
Pettit, P (2004) Depoliticizing Democracy. Ratio Juris 17(1), 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
la Repubblica (2011) Monti: spero non mi chiamino, già nel 94 dissi no a Palazzo Chigi. 9 August, https://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2011/08/09/monti-spero-non-mi-chiamino-gia-nel.html.Google Scholar
Riker, WH (1982) Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Oxford: Freeman.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P (2011) Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Cuenca, I (2017) From a Deficit of Democracy to a Technocratic Order: The Postcrisis Debate on Europe. Annual Review of Political Science 20, 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, V (2006) Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, V (2011) Can Technocratic Government Be Democratic? Telos-eu, 23 November, www.telos-eu.com/en/european-politics/can-technocratic-government-be-democratic.html.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V (2013) Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and Throughput. Political Studies 61(1), 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schudson, M (2006) The Trouble with Experts – and Why Democracies Need Them. Theory and Society 35(5–6), 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensini, M (2011) Il documento segreto della Bce: ridurre gli stipendi pubblici. Corriere della Sera, 29 September, www.corriere.it/economia/11_settembre_29/sensini_documento_bce_e68f29d6-ea58-11e0-ae06-4da866778017.shtml.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M (2005) Deliberative, ‘Independent’ Technocracy v. Democratic Politics: Will the Globe Echo the EU? Law and Contemporary Problems 68(3–4), 341–356.Google Scholar
Skelton, D (2011) Government of the Technocrats, by the Technocrats, for the Technocrats. New Statesman, 16 November, www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/11/european-greece-technocrats.Google Scholar
Streeck, W (2015) Heller, Schmitt, and the Euro. European Law Journal 21(3), 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, L (2011) The World Must Insist that Europe Act. Financial Times, 18 September, www.ft.com/content/5eaa83dc-dfca-11e0-b1db-00144feabdc0.Google Scholar
Telegraph (2011) S&P Downgrades Italy: The Full Text. 20 September, www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8775616/SandP-downgrades-Italy-the-full-text.html.Google Scholar
Williams, JT (1985) Systemic Influences on Political Trust: The Importance of Perceived Institutional Performance. Political Methodology 11, 125–142.Google Scholar
Wintour, P and Elliott, L (2011) G20 Leaders Press Italy to Accept IMF Checks on Cuts Programme. Guardian, 4 November, www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/04/g20-italy-imf-checks-cuts.Google Scholar
Wolkenstein, F (2015) What Can We Hold against Populism? Philosophy and Social Criticism 41(2), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar