Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:16:29.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Warden's Dilemma as Nested Game: Political Self-Sacrifice, Instrumental Rationality, and Third Parties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2019

Brian S. Denny*
Affiliation:
Brian S. Denny, Department of Political Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: bdenny@uci.edu

Abstract

Inspired by the famous Prisoner's Dilemma game theory model, Karin Marie Fierke introduced the Warden's Dilemma to explain self-sacrifice and compromise in asymmetric interactions and to show that such an explanation requires a social ontology. She applied her model to Irish Republican Army hunger strikes in 1980–1981. Her model, however, closely resembles what game theorists call a ‘nested game’. This article (re)introduces the nested Warden's Dilemma, focuses on the tripartite relationship inherent to the model and examines hunger strikes as part of a strategy potentially informed by instrumental rationality and knowledge of the Warden's Dilemma dynamic. After briefly discussing the implications of approaching self-sacrificial behaviour from a rationalist perspective, a case study of strategic non-violence in Myanmar (Burma) demonstrates how third parties can both diffuse instrumental rationality regarding political self-sacrifice and facilitate patterns of resistance that appear to capitalize on the Warden's Dilemma dynamic.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2019. Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AEI (Albert Einstein Institution) (1998) The First Five Years – 1983–1988 and Plans for the Future, www.aeinstein.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/1983-1988.pdf.Google Scholar
AEI (Albert Einstein Institution) (n.d.) About Us, www.aeinstein.org/about/.Google Scholar
AFDB (American Friends of Democracy in Burma) (1992a) Training Burmese Citizens for Strategic Nonviolent Struggle (20 July). AFDB project summary. In Nathan, R, Periodic Report (April 1–June 30, 1992). Report to National Endowment for Democracy.Google Scholar
AFDB (American Friends of Democracy in Burma) (1992b) Training Burmese Citizens for Strategic Nonviolent Struggle (16 November). Project proposal submitted to the National Endowment for Democracy on 20 November 1992.Google Scholar
AFDB (American Friends of Democracy in Burma) (n.d.a) Evaluation Report: NED Grant Number 92-45.0. Draft.Google Scholar
AFDB (American Friends of Democracy in Burma) (n.d.b) Support for the Political Defiance Committee, National Council of the Union of Burma. Project proposal.Google Scholar
Bew, P (1984) The Problem of Ulster Terrorism: The Historical Roots. In Alexander, Y and O'Day, A (eds), Terrorism in Ireland. Beckenham: Croom Helm, pp. 235245.Google Scholar
Boyce, DG (1995) The Suffering People and the Threatened Community: Two Traditions of Political Violence in Ireland. In O'Day, A (ed.), Terrorism's Laboratory: The Case of Northern Ireland. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth Publishing Company, pp. 1126.Google Scholar
CRDB (Committee for the Restoration of Democracy in Burma) (1987) The First Step: Laying Foundation for Peace in Burma. Report to the International Center for Development Policy, 1 August.Google Scholar
CRDB (Committee for the Restoration of Democracy in Burma) (1988a) Formation of USA Chapter. Memorandum, 13 November.Google Scholar
CRDB (Committee for the Restoration of Democracy in Burma) (1988b) One Step Further: The Special Report, 29 January.Google Scholar
CRDB (Committee for the Restoration of Democracy in Burma) (1988c) Tyranny's Dying Breath. Open letter, 20 April.Google Scholar
CRDB (Committee for the Restoration of Democracy in Burma) (1989) What is CRDB? CRDB Update, January–March, 1(1).Google Scholar
CRDB (Committee for the Restoration of Democracy in Burma) (n.d.a) CRDB President Responds: Interview with the President. In CRDB: The First 5 Years. CRDB promotional publication.Google Scholar
CRDB (Committee for the Restoration of Democracy in Burma) (n.d.b) The Eyewitness Report Furnished to the CRDB G.Hqs by a Western Diplomat as Regards the Students and Mass Riots Occurred in Rangoon, Burma Between June 21–23, 1988. Memorandum.Google Scholar
Drake, C (1995) The Provision IRA: Reorganisation and the Long War. In O'Day, A (ed.), Terrorism's Laboratory: The Case of Northern Ireland. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth Publishing Company, pp. 87114.Google Scholar
FIDH-ITUC (International Federation for Human Rights and the International Trade Union Confederation) (2007) Burma's ‘Saffron Revolution’ is Not Over: Time for the International Community to Act. December, 19fn14. www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/Birmania_FIDH_ITUC_101107.pdf.Google Scholar
Fierke, KM (2012a) The Warden's Dilemma: Self-Sacrifice and Compromise in Asymmetric Interactions. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics 47(3), 321341. https://doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01365.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierke, KM (2012b) Political Self-Sacrifice: Agency, Body and Emotions in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierke, KM and Nicholson, M (2001) Divided by a Common Language: Formal and Constructivist Approaches to Games. Global Society 15(1), 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, MJ (1913) The Ancient Brehon Laws of Ireland. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register 61(4), 217233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüne-Yanoff, T and Schweinzer, P (2008) The Roles of Stories in Applying Game Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 15(2), 131146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helvey, R (n.d.a) Lesson Plan PD 311.2, the Operation Plan. In unpublished collection of lesson plans in Cornell University, Rare and Manuscript Collection, Louis Walinsky Papers, 1978–1992, Collection 4874, Box 9, http://rmc.library.cornell.edu/EAD/htmldocs/RMM04874.html.Google Scholar
Helvey, R (n.d.b) Lesson Plan PD 315.1, Contaminants to Political Defiance and Associated Risks. In unpublished collection of lesson plans in Cornell University, Louis Walinsky Papers, 1978–1992, Collection 4874, Box 9, http://rmc.library.cornell.edu/EAD/htmldocs/RMM04874.html.Google Scholar
Helvey, R (n.d.c) National Council of the Union of Burma, Strategic Plan: The Liberation of Burma, Draft. In Lesson Plan PD 310, Grand Strategy and Supporting Plans. In unpublished collection of lesson plans in Cornell University, Louis Walinsky Papers, 1978–1992, Collection 4874, Box 9, http://rmc.library.cornell.edu/EAD/htmldocs/RMM04874.html.Google Scholar
Helvey, R (n.d.d) Political Defiance Strategic Plan in Support of Strategic Plan of the National Council of the Union of Burma. In Lesson Plan PD 310, Grand Strategy and Supporting Plans. In unpublished collection of lesson plans in Cornell University, Louis Walinsky Papers, 1978–1992, Collection 4874, Box 9, http://rmc.library.cornell.edu/EAD/htmldocs/RMM04874.html.Google Scholar
Helvey, R (n.d.e) Problem Solving for PD Operations. In Lesson Plan PD 311, Introduction to the Operational Art of Political Defiance. In unpublished collection of lesson plans in Cornell University, Louis Walinsky Papers, 1978–1992, Collection 4874, Box 9, http://rmc.library.cornell.edu/EAD/htmldocs/RMM04874.html.Google Scholar
Horgan, J (2013) Divided We Stand: The Strategy and Psychology of Ireland's Dissident Terrorists. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazmin, A (2007) Defiance Undeterred: Burmese Activists Seek Ways to Oust the Junta. Financial Times, 6 December, www.ft.com/content/288da570-a425-11dc-a28d-0000779fd2ac.Google Scholar
Lennon, J (2007) Fasting for the Public: Irish and Indian Sources of Marion Wallace Dunlop's 1909 Hunger Strike. In Flannery, E and Mitchell, A (eds), Enemies of Empire: New Perspectives on Imperialism, Literature and Historiography. Gateshead: Athenaeum Press, pp. 1939.Google Scholar
Lintner, B (1998) Protest and Run. Far Eastern Economic Review, 17 September, 161(38), 22.Google Scholar
McKearney, T (2011) The Provisional IRA: From Insurrection to Parliament. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Monteiro, N and Ruby, K (2009) IR and the False Promise of Philosophical Foundations. International Theory 1(1), 1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulholland, M (2002) The Longest War: Northern Ireland's Troubled History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nathan, R (1992a) Letter to National Endowment for Democracy, 12 November. Cornell University, Louis Walinsky Papers, 1978–1992, Collection 4874, Box 9, http://rmc.library.cornell.edu/EAD/htmldocs/RMM04874.html.Google Scholar
Nathan, R (1992b) Periodic Report (April 1–June 30, 1992). Report to National Endowment for Democracy.Google Scholar
O'Doherty, M (1998) The Trouble with Guns: Republican Strategy and the Provisional IRA. Belfast: Blackstaff Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, H (1997) The Politics of Illusion: A Political History of the IRA. London: Serif Books.Google Scholar
Sands, B (1990) The Diary of Bobby Sands: The First Seventeen Days of Bobby's H-Block Hunger-Strike to the Death, 2nd edn. Dublin: Republican Publications.Google Scholar
Sharp, G (1979) Gandhi as a Political Strategist. Boston, MA: Porter Sargent Publishers.Google Scholar
Sharp, G (1992) Re: Robert Helvey's ‘Political Defiance’ Course Given at Manerplaw. Letter to American Friends of Democracy in Burma, 18 November. Cornell University, Louis Walinsky Papers, 1978–1992, Collection 4874, Box 9, http://rmc.library.cornell.edu/EAD/htmldocs/RMM04874.html.Google Scholar
South, A (2003) Mon Nationalism and Civil War in Burma. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spencer, M (2008) Training Pro-Democracy Movements: A Conversation with Colonel Robert Helvey. Peace Magazine 24(1), 1215.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G (1990) Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (1996) Human Rights Questions: Human Rights Situations and Reports of Special Rapporteurs and Representatives, 30 October, UN Document A/C.3/51/12.Google Scholar