Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:28:34.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dialect of the Tribe: Modes of Communication and the Epiphanic Role of Nonhuman Imagery in T. S. Eliot's Four Quartets*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2015

William Kevin Penny*
Affiliation:
Yokohama City University

Extract

In T. S. Eliot's Four Quartets an attempt is made to investigateoften in a discursive mannernotions of time, language, and the divine. Yet the poet is hindered by certain limitations: wordsas a primary vehicle of expressioncollapse under the pressure, frequently sabotaging attempts at true articulation as detailed in the poem's opening quartet, Burnt Norton: “Words strain, / Crack and sometimes break, under the burden, / Under the tension. . .” (V: 149–51). Consequently, the medium of language itself frames an apparent contradiction throughout the Quartets: how a contrived system can represent notions intrinsically elusive and ephemeral. This conundrum inculcates all four of the poems, making them in some ways the ironic frame of their own reference. Despite this inherent dilemma, Eliot recognized that harnessing certain imageryboth animate and inanimateand exploiting it for its numinous qualities was indispensable to achieving his aesthetic and thematic aims. Such imagery included elements taken from the natural world which pointed beyond their own outward forms to some ideal form that lay behind them. It was an approach motivated in part by what Frye describes as the poet's concern with Heraclitean logos zynos—or a “common logos”and had as its aim the participation of man in the divine. To achieve such ends, Eliot relied on bird calls, echoes, bones, bells, and other seemingly prosaic phenomena and transformed them into conduits by which revelations might occur. That is, certain central images the poet adopts in Four Quartets—though not endowed with the capacity for human languageare nevertheless engendered with communicativeness of a uniquely numinous kind. Aligned with this notion was Eliot's belief that the way to commune with the past and with the divine was through ritual; by employing common natural objects and investing each with sacramental significance, the poet was able to evoke a temporal link with the ineffable world. It was also a means of reconciling what he perceived as the disjuncture with conventional language. By grounding the effort in an approach reminiscent of sacred Christian ritual and aesthetically portraying a new mode of communication consistent with transformative ceremony, Eliot aimed at the restoration of a past community of values. This highly distinct mode of communing came to represent its own unique type of langue, carrying forward thematic concerns while at the same time detailing a stylistic approach to poetic composition not prevalent in Eliot's earlier work.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to the anonymous reviewers of HTR for their helpful suggestions and advice on earlier drafts of this paper. Also, I would like to extend a special thanks to E. Atkinson, who assisted in keeping the paper grounded in Christian faith and spiritually focused.

References

1 Eliot, T. S., Complete Poems and Plays: 1909–1950 (Orlando: Harcourt, Brace, 1980)Google Scholar. All sub-sequent quotations from Four Quartets in this paper reference this edition.

2 Frye, Northrop, T. S. Eliot (ed. Jeffares, A. Norman; Writers and Critics Series; Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1963) 42Google Scholar.

3 Brown, Dennis, “T. S. Eliot's ‘Ash-Wednesday’ and ‘Four Quartets’: Poetic Confession as Psychotherapy,” Literature and Theology 17 (2003) 116, esp. 8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Childs, Donald J., T. S. Eliot: Mystic, Son, and Lover (London: The Athlone, 1997) 186225Google Scholar.

5 Cooper, John Xiros, “Music as Symbol and Structure in Pound's ‘Pisan Cantos’ and Eliot's ‘Four Quartets’,” in Ezra Pound and Europe (ed. Taylor, Richard and Melchior, Claus; Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B. V., 1993) 177–90, esp. 182–83Google Scholar.

6 Wolosky, Shira, Language Mysticism: The Negative Way of Language in Eliot, Beckett, and Celan (Stanford: Stanford University, 1995) 11Google Scholar.

7 Wolosky, Language Mysticism, 38.

8 Moody, David A., “Four Quartets: Music, Word, Meaning, and Value,” in The Cambridge Companion to T. S. Eliot (ed. Moody, David A.; Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1994) 142–57, at 150CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Tiffany, Daniel, Infidel Poetics: Riddles, Nightlife, Substance (Chicago: University of Chicago, 2009) 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Veivo, Harri, “The New Literary Semiotics,” Semiotica 165 (2007) 4155, at 44Google Scholar.

11 Ponzio, Augusto, “Sign, Dialogue, and Alterity,” Semiotica 173 (2009) 129–54, at 130Google Scholar.

12 Moody, “Four Quartets: Music, Word, Meaning, and Value,” 151.

13 Brooker, Jewel Spears, Mastery and Escape: T. S. Eliot and the Dialectic of Modernism (Amherst: University of Massachusetts, 1994) 160Google Scholar.

14 Marshall, Alan, “England and Nowhere,” in The Cambridge Companion to T. S. Eliot (ed. Moody, David A.; Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1994) 94107, at 102CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Cook, Cornelia, “Fire and Spirit: Scripture's Shaping Presence in T. S. Eliot's ‘Four Quartets’.” Literature and Theology 15 (2001) 85101, at 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Riquelme, John Paul, Harmony of Dissonances: T. S. Eliot, Romanticism, and Imagination (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1991) 45Google Scholar.

17 Cook, “Fire and Spirit,” 90.

18 See Waugh, Patricia, Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide (Oxford: Oxford University, 2006) 126Google Scholar.

19 See Hardy, Thomas, “The Darkling Thrush” in Selected Poems (London: Penguin Classics, 1998) 33Google Scholar.

20 Monroe, William F., “T. S. Eliot's Gnostic Impulses,” Journal of Literature and Theology 6 (1992) 191206CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 195.

21 See Lanham, Richard A., A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (Berkeley: University of California, 1991) 123Google Scholar.

22 See Wales, Katie, A Dictionary of Stylistics (New York: Longman, 2001) 325Google Scholar.

23 Moody, “Four Quartets: Music, Word, Meaning, and Value,” 151.

24 Eliot, T. S., Complete Poems and Plays: 1909–1950 (Orlando: Harcourt, Brace, 1980) 21Google Scholar.

25 Moody, “Four Quartets: Music, Word, Meaning, and Value,” 145.

26 Cook, “Fire and Spirit,” 94.

27 Ibid., 98.

28 See Martz, Louis L., Many Gods and Many Voices: The Role of the Prophet in English and American Modernism (Columbia: University of Missouri, 1998) 140Google Scholar.

29 See Spurr, Barry, “The Centre of Meaning in Eliot's ‘Four Quartets’” in Seeking the Centre: The 2001 Australian International Religion, Literature and Arts Conference Proceedings (Sydney: RLA, 2002) 370–78, at 376Google Scholar.

30 Leimberg, Inge, “The Place Revisited in T. S. Eliot's ‘Four Quartets’,” Connotations 8 (1998/99) 6392, at 73–74Google Scholar.

31 Nemerov, Howard, The Collected Poems of Howard Nemerov (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1977) 196Google Scholar.

32 Shelestiuk, Helen V., “Semantics of Symbol,” Semiotica 144 (2003) 233–59, at 249Google Scholar.

33 See Bodkin, Maud, Archetypal Patterns in Poetry: Psychological Studies of Imagination (New York: Vintage, 1961) 259–60Google Scholar.