Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T05:54:27.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Access to primary care in Hong Kong, Greater London and New York City

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2012

Pui Hing Chau*
Affiliation:
Research Assistant Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Jean Woo
Affiliation:
Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Michael K. Gusmano
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, New York Medical College, USA Research Scholar, Hastings Center, USA
Daniel Weisz
Affiliation:
Associate Research Scientist, World Cities Project, International Longevity Center, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
Victor G. Rodwin
Affiliation:
Professor, Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University, New York, USA
Kam Che Chan
Affiliation:
Senior Research Assistant, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
*
*Correspondence to: Pui Hing Chau, Research Assistant Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Room 104, Meng Wah Complex, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China. Email: phchau@graduate.hku.hk

Abstract

We investigate avoidable hospital conditions (AHC) in three world cities as a way to assess access to primary care. Residents of Hong Kong are healthier than their counterparts in Greater London or New York City. In contrast to their counterparts in New York City, residents of both Greater London and Hong Kong face no financial barriers to an extensive public hospital system. We compare residence-based hospital discharge rates for AHC, by age cohorts, in these cities and find that New York City has higher rates than Hong Kong and Greater London. Hong Kong has the lowest hospital discharge rates for AHC among the population 15–64, but its rates are nearly as high as those in New York City among the population 65 and over. Our findings suggest that in contrast to Greater London, older residents in Hong Kong and New York face significant barriers in accessing primary care. In all three cities, people living in lower socioeconomic status neighborhoods are more likely to be hospitalized for an AHC, but neighborhood inequalities are greater in Hong Kong and New York than in Greater London.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agabiti, N., Pirani, M., Schifano, P., Cesaroni, G., Davoli, M., Bisanti, L., Caranci, N., Costa, G., Forastiere, F., Marinacci, C., Russo, A., Spadea, T., Perucci, C. (2009), ‘Income level and chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions in adults: a multicity population-based study in Italy’, BMC Public Health, 9: 457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmad, O., Boschi-Pinto, C., Lopez, A. D., Murray, C. J. L., Lozano, R., Inoue, M. (2001), Age Standardization of Rates: A New WHO World Standard. GPE Discussion Paper Series, No. 31, Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Banks, J., Marmot, M., Oldfield, Z.Smith, J. P. (2006), ‘Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 295: 20372045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billings, J.Weinick, R. M. (2003), Monitoring the Health Care Safety Net, Book I: A Data Book for Metropolitan Areas, Washington, DC: Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research.Google Scholar
Billings, J., Anderson, G. M.Newman, L. S. (1996), ‘Recent findings on preventable hospitalizations’, Health Affairs (Millwood), 15: 239349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bureau of Vital Statistics, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (2010), Summary of Vital Statistics 2009 – the City of New York, Electronic: Bureau of Vital Statistics, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.Google Scholar
Casanova, C.Starfield, B. (1995), ‘Hospitalizations of children and access to primary care: a cross-national comparison’, International Journal of Health Services, 25(2): 283294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government (2009), Thematic Household Survey Report No. 41, Electronic: Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government.Google Scholar
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government (2010), Hong Kong Life Tables, 1971–2010, Electronic: Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government.Google Scholar
Chau, P. H.Woo, J. (2008), How Well are Seniors in Hong Kong Doing? An International Comparison, Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Jockey Club.Google Scholar
Chau, P. H., Woo, J., Chan, K. C., Weisz, D., Gusmano, M. K. (2011), ‘Avoidable mortality pattern in a Chinese population – Hong Kong, China’, European Journal of Public Health, 21: 215220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, N.Fitzpatrick, J. (2009), Health and Lifestyle in London – Initial Findings from the London Boost of the Health Survey for England, Electronic: London Health Observatory.Google Scholar
Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government and Department of Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong (2005), Population Health Survey 2003/2004, Electronic: Centre for Health Protection, Hong Kong SAR Government.Google Scholar
Evandrou, M. (2006), ‘Inequalities Amongst Older People in London: The Challenge of Diversity’, in V. G. Rodwin and M. K. Gusmano (eds), Growing Older in World Cities, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government (2010), My Health My Choice: Healthcare Reform Second Stage Public Consultation – Consultation Document, Electronic: Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government.Google Scholar
Gusmano, M. K.Allin, S. (2011), ‘Health care for older persons in England and the United States: a contrast of systems and values’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 36(1): 89118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gusmano, M. K., Rodwin, V. G.Weisz, D. (2006), ‘A new way to compare health systems: avoidable hospital conditions in Manhattan and Paris’, Health Affairs (Millwood), 25: 510520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gusmano, M. K., Rodwin, V. G.Weisz, D. (2010), Health Care in World Cities: London, New York and Paris, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J. B.Kaneda, T. (2005), ‘Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and access to health care’, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(1): 1531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, G. M., Wong, I. O. L., Chan, W. S., Choi, S.Lo, S. V., on behalf of the Health Care Financing Study Group (2005), ‘The ecology of health care in Hong Kong’, Social Science & Medicine, 61: 577590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magán, P., Alberquilla, A., Otero, A.Ribera, J. M. (2011), ‘Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions and quality of primary care: their relation with socioeconomic and health care variables in the Madrid regional health service (Spain)’, Medical Care, 49(1): 1723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millman, M. L. (1993), Access to Health Care in America, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Health Service (2011), Help with Health Costs, Electronic: NHS.Google Scholar
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (2009), Community Health Survey, Electronic: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics, United Kingdom (2010), Life Expectancy at Birth and at Age 65 by Local Areas in the United Kingdom, 2007–2009, Electronic: Office for National Statistics, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Pappas, G., Hadden, W. C., Kozak, L. J.Fisher, G. F. (1997), ‘Potentially avoidable hospitalizations: inequalities in rates between US socioeconomic groups’, American Journal of Public Health, 87: 811816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parchman, M. L.Culler, S. D. (1999), ‘Preventable hospitalizations in primary care shortage areas. An analysis of vulnerable medicare beneficiaries’, Archives of Family Medicine, 8: 487491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parchman, M. L.Culler, S. (1994), ‘Primary care physicians and avoidable hospitalizations’, Journal of Family Practice, 39: 123128.Google ScholarPubMed
Purdy, S., Griffin, T., Salisbury, C.Sharp, D. (2009), ‘Ambulatory care sensitive conditions: terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians’, Public Health, 123(2): 169173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricketts, T. C., Randolph, R., Howard, H. A., Pathman, D., Carey, T. (2001), ‘Hospitalization rates as indicators of access to primary care’, Health Place, 7(1): 2738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodwin, V. G., Brecher, C., Jully, D.Baxter, R. (eds) (1992), Public Hospital Systems in New York and Paris, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Roos, N. P.Mustard, C. (1997), ‘Variation in health and health care use by socioeconomic status in Winnipeg, Canada: does the system work well? Yes and No’, The Milbank Quarterly, 75(1): 89111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saha, S., Solotaroff, R., Oster, A.Bindman, A. B. (2007), ‘Are preventable hospitalizations sensitive to changes in access to primary care? The case of the Oregon Health Plan’, Medical Care, 45(8): 712719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starfield, B. (1994), ‘Is primary care essential?’, Lancet, 344: 11291133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starfield, B., Shi, L.Macinko, J. (2005), ‘Contribution of primary care to health systems and health’, The Milbank Quarterly, 83(3): 457502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, J. S., Gatsonis, C.Epstein, A. M. (1992), ‘Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 268: 23882394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woo, J., Mak, B., Cheng, J. O.Choy, E. (2011), ‘Identifying service needs from the users and service providers’ perspective: a focus group study of Chinese elders, health and social care professionals’, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20: 34633471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed