Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T08:23:53.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incentives and models of governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2015

Gwyn Bevan
Gwyn Bevan*
Affiliation:
Department of Management, London School of Economics, London, UK
*
*Correspondence to: Gwyn Bevan, Department of Management, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. Email: R.G.Bevan@lse.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This short commentary on Oliver’s review of incentives relates that review to four models of governance: Trust and Altruism (T&A), Choice and Competition (C&C), Naming and Shaming (N&S) and Targets and Terror (T&T).

Type
Special Section
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 345 - 350
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, M. (2007), Instruction to Deliver: Tony Blair, the Public Services and the Challenge of Achieving Targets, London: Politico.Google Scholar
Bevan, G. (2011), ‘Regulation and System Management’, in N. Mays, A. Dixon and L. Jones (eds), Understanding New Labour’s Market Reforms of the English NHS, London: King’s Fund, 89–111.Google Scholar
Bevan, G. (2014), The Impacts of Asymmetric Devolution on Health Care in the Four Countries of the UK, London: Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
Bevan, G. and Fasolo, B. (2013), ‘Models of Governance of Public Services: Empirical and Behavioural Analysis of “Econs” and “Humans”’, in A. Oliver (ed.), Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38–62.Google Scholar
Bevan, G. and Wilson, D. (2013), ‘Does “naming and shaming” work for schools and hospitals? Lessons from natural experiments following devolution in England and Wales’, Public Money & Management, 33(4): 245–252.Google Scholar
Bevan, G., Karanikolos, M., Exley, J., Nolte, E., Connolly, S. and Mays, N. (2014), Comparing the Performance of the National Health Service in the Four Countries of the United Kingdom Before and After Devolution, London: The Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
Burgess, S., Wilson, D. and Worth, J. (2010), ‘A Natural Experiment in School Accountability: The Impact of School Performance Information on Pupil Progress and Sorting’, Discussion Paper No. 10/246, CMPO, Bristol.Google Scholar
Coulter, A., Maistre, N. L. and Henderson, L. (2005), Patients’ Experience of Choosing where to Undergo Surgical Treatment. Evaluation of London Patient Choice Scheme, Oxford: Picker Institute Europe.Google Scholar
Fung, C. H., Lim, Y. W., Mattke, S., Damberg, C. and Shekelle, P. G. (2008), ‘Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care’, Annals of Internal Medicine 148: 111–123.Google Scholar
Greenaway, J. R. (1985), ‘Parliamentary reform and civil service reform: a nineteenth century debate reassessed’, Parliamentary History, 4(1): 157–169.Google Scholar
Hibbard, J. H. (2008), ‘What can we say about the impact of public reporting? Inconsistent execution yields variable results’, Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(2): 160–161.Google Scholar
Hibbard, J. H., Stockard, J. and Tusler, M. (2003), ‘Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts?’, Health Affairs, 22(2): 84–94.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B. and Milgrom, P. (1991), ‘Multitask principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design’, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 7 (special issue): 24–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. (1995), ‘The “new public management” in the 1980s: variations on a theme’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3): 93–109.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1785), ‘On the Independency of Parliament’, in T. H. Green and T. H. Gross (ed.), Essays Moral, Political, and Literary Volume 1 London: Longmans. [cited by Le Grand (2003)].Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (2003), Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (2009), The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering Public Services Through Choice and Competition, Woodstock, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, M. N., Shekelle, P. G., Leatherman, S. and Brook, R. H. (2000), ‘The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(14): 1866–1874.Google Scholar
Oliver, A. (2007), ‘The Veterans Health Administration: an American success story?’, The Milbank Quarterly, 85: 5–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, A. (2015), ‘Incentivising improvements in health care delivery’, Health Economics Policy and Law, 10(3): 327–343.Google Scholar
Secretary of State for Health (2010), Independent Inquiry into Care Provided by Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust January 2005–March 2009 (Chair Robert Francis QC). HC375-I Session 2009/10 London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1976), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar