No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Justification and Time in Hegel's Phenomenology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2015
Abstract
H. S. Harris, in his two-volume study of Hegel's Phenomenology, endorses both the titles that Hegel gave to this work. As a science of experience, Harris says, the Phenomenology situates us within the psychology of the singular self, the self's sense of its own consciousness, and exhibits therein “the conceptual structure of pure science.” As the phenomenology of spirit, the Phenomenology shows how an individual situated within his or her own experience and history belongs to the universal life of a spirit that encompasses all history and all selfhood. Thus, the Phenomenology demonstrates that the temporality of the singular self holds within itself eternity; and it conceives this eternity as the pure logic of philosophical science which is “the interpretation of its world by a rationally scientific community.” Harris intends to show that the Phenomenology is a continuous science in its own right, and that the logic developed in Hegel's philosophical system simply detaches this scientific, logical dimension from its embeddedness in the concreteness of human experience.
- Type
- H.S. Harris and Hegel's Phenomenology
- Information
- Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 22 , Issue 1-2: number 43/44 , January 2001 , pp. 15 - 43
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2001
References
Sources: G. W. F. Hegel
Enzyklopädie der Philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (1830) in Werke (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1986). The first part of the Enzyklopädie, “die Wissenschaft der Logik” is cited as E.L. Citations refer to section numbers (#) common to all editions and English translations; Remarks are indicated by R, Addenda by A following the section number.Google Scholar
The Encyclopaedia Logic, trans. Geraets, T. F., Suchting, W. A., Harris, H. S. (Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 1991).Google Scholar
Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, ed. Hoffmeister, Johannes (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1955). Cited as PhR. Citations refer to section numbers (#) common to all editions and English translations; Remarks are indicated by R, Addenda by A following the section number.Google Scholar
Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen W., trans. Nisbet, H. B. (Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Phänomenologie des Geistes, eds. Hans-Friedrich Wessels & Heinrich Clairmont, according to the text of Gesammelte Werke Band 9, eds. Bonsiepen, Wolfgang & Heede, Reinhard (1980). Cited as PhG. Citations refer first to the numerical ordering carried over from Gesammelte Werke Band 9 followed by the page numbers of the Wessels & Clairmont edition, thus: PhG 53/57.Google Scholar
Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V. (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1977). Included within citations of the Phänomenologie des Geistes, indicated as M followed by the section number, e.g. (M #73).Google Scholar
Wissenschaft der Logik: Die Lehre vom Sein (1832), ed. Hans-Jürgen Gawoll (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1990) according to the text of Gesammelte Werke Band 21, eds. Hogemann, F. & Jaeschke, W. (1985). Cited as WL (1832). Citations refer first to the numerical ordering carried over from Gesammelte Werke Band 21 followed by the page numbers of the Gawoll edition, thus: WL (1832) 27/25-26.Google Scholar
Hegel's Science of Logic, trans. Miller, A. V. (London: Allen & Unwin/New York: Humanities Press, 1969). Included within citations of the Wissenschaft der Logik, indicated as M followed by the page number, e.g. (M/43).Google Scholar