Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:38:54.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kierkegaard and Speculative Theology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

George Pattison*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Theology, Oxford, george.pattison@theology.ox.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

In recent years, the long-standing philosophical and religious duel between ‘Hegel’ and ‘Kierkegaard’ has quiedy transmuted into something that, if still far from an amicable resolution, is something much less black and white. We are, of course, collectively grateful to Jon Stewart for demonstrating not only something of the extent to which ‘Kierkegaard's relation to Hegel’ needs to be re-envisaged as ‘Kierkegaard's relations to Hegel,’ but also that, often, even mosdy, the passages where Kierkegaard is seemingly attacking Hegel are actually directed against one or other, often Danish, representative of Hegelianism — above all, against J. L. Heiberg and H. L. Martensen. As a biographical narrative, this is largely beyond dispute — though, as many of Stewart's critics have noted, this does not necessarily lead, as he himself suggests, to the elimination of crucial philosophical differences between the two erstwhile protagonists.

In this paper, I accept Stewart's point that Kierkegaard's reception of Hegel is inseparable from his multiple receptions of Hegelianism. I shall, however, offer a particular focus on a part of the story that, I believe, still remains under-represented in the secondary literature, namely, Kierkegaard's early response to a number of those theologians often referred to as ‘Right’ Hegelians. This focus calls for a revision of Stewart's emphasis on the relation to Heiberg and Martensen as the decisive factor in Kierkegaard's anti-Hegelianism.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, Bruno (18361838), Zeitschrift für speculative Theologie, Vols 1–3, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bitter, S. (2007), ‘Erdmann: Appropriation and Criticism, Error and Understanding’ in Stewart, Jon ed., Kierkegaard and his German Contemporaries. Tome II: Theology Aldershot: Ashgate, 79100.Google Scholar
Daub, , (1837), ‘Die Form der Christlichen Dogmen- und Kirchen-Histories.’ in Zeitschrift für spekulative Theokgie, Vol. 2, 88161.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Johan Eduard (1837), Vorlesungen über Glauben und Wissen als Einleitung in die Dogmatik und Religionsphilosophie gehalten und auf den Wunsch seiner Zuhörer herausgegeben, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Emanuel (1933), Kierkegaard-Studien, vol. 2. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren (1985), Philosophical Fragments, trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren (1989), The Concept of Irony, trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren (1992), Concluding Unscientific Postscript, trans. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren (1997-) Søren Kierkegaards Skrifter, ed. Cappelørn, N.-J. et al., 28 vols.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren (2007-, Kierkegaard's Journals and Notebooks, trans, and ed. Kirmmse, Bruce H. et al., Princeton: Princeton University Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martensen, Hans L. (1997), ‘The Autonomy of Human Self-consciousness in Modern Dogmatic Theology,’ in Between Hegel and Kierkegaard: Hans L. Martensen's Philosophy of Religion, trans. Thompson, C. L. and Kangas, D. J.. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Pattison, George (2005), The Philosophy of Kierkegaard. Chesham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, Karl (1831), Encyklopaedie der theokgischen Wissenschaften, Halle.Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, Karl (1837), ‘Eine Parallele zur Religionsphilosophie’ in Zeitschrift für spekulative Theokgie, Vol. 2, 131.Google Scholar
Sack, Karl Heinrich (1838), Christliche Polemik, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Schaller, Julius (1838) Der historische Christus und die Philosophie. Kritik der Grundidee des Werks das Leben Jesu von Dr. D. F. Strauss, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (2003), Kierkegaard's Relations to Hegel Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiße, C. H (1837), ‘Die drei Grundfragen der gegenwärtigen Philosophie. Mit bezug auf die Schrift: Die Philosophie unsere Zeit. Zur Apologie und Erläuterung. Von Julius Schaller.’ Leipzig: Hindrichs.Google Scholar