Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:26:46.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Phenomenology, Mass-Society and the Individual in Hegel and Heidegger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2017

Matthew Rukgaber
Matthew Rukgaber*
Affiliation:
Eastern Connecticut State University and Gateway Community College, USAmatthew.rukgaber@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

This article argues that Hegel’s dialectic of wealth and power in the stage of social development called ‘culture’ (Bildung) reveals that even in moments of profound social alienation, Spirit (Geist)—the labour of constructing identity and freedom—remains. This stands in sharp contrast to Heidegger’s theory of alienation and Dasein’s ‘publicity’ (Offentlichkeit), which paints modern social existence as a profound threat to the very ‘Being’ and ‘possibilities’ of human life. The supposed threats of inauthenticity and mass existence are, from a Hegelian perspective, failures of adequate social phenomenology. The desiring, affective subject is not absorbed in the ‘they’ (das Man) but is, instead, the negativity that constantly transforms culture and the structure of social selfhood.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 38 , Special Issue 1: Hegel and Phenomenology , May 2017 , pp. 129 - 149
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. [1963] (1993), Hegel: Three Studies, trans. S. Nicholsen. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
de Boer, K. (2000), Thinking in the Light of Time: Heidegger’s Encounter with Hegel. Albany NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Capobianco, R. (2010), Engaging Heidegger. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Carman, T. (2003), Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse and Authenticity in Being and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coser, L. (1956), The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Crowell, S. (2015), ‘Responsibility, Autonomy, Affectivity: A Heideggerian Approach’, in D. McManus (ed.), Heidegger, Authenticity, and the Self: Themes from Division Two of Being and Time. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, D. (2015), ‘Authenticity and the Absence of Death’, in D. McManus (ed.), Heidegger, Authenticity, and the Self: Themes from Division Two of Being and Time. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dastur, F. (2002), ‘The Call of Conscience: The Most Intimate Alterity’, in F. Raffoul and D. Pettigrew. Heidegger and Practical Philosophy. Albany NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Dastur, F. (2013), ‘Heidegger and the Question of the ‘Essence’ of Language’, in J. Powell (ed.), Heidegger and Language. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. [1883] (1989), Introduction to the Human Sciences. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (1991), Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (2005), ‘Can There Be a Better Source of Meaning than Everyday Practices? Reinterpreting Division I of Being and Time in the Light of Division II’, in R. Polt (ed.), Heidegger’s Being and Time: Critical Essays. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Duff, A. (2015), Heidegger and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967), Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Goldie, P. (2000), The Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griesch, J. (2002), ‘The “Play of Transcendence” and the Question of Ethics’, in F. Raffoul and D. Pettigrew, Heidegger and Practical Philosophy. Albany NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, S. (2007), Contradiction in Motion: Hegel’s Organic Concept of Life and Value. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hatab, L. (2000), Ethics and Finitude: Heideggerian Contributions to Moral Philosophy. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. [1797] (1948), ‘Love’, in On Christianity: Early Theological Writings. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. [1805] (1983), Hegel and the Human Spirit: A Translation of the Jena Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit, trans. L. Rauch. Detroit MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1952), Philosophy of Right, trans. T. M. Knox. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1956), The Philosophy of History, trans. J. Sibree. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. [1933–4] (2010), Being and Truth. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. [1935] (2000), Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. G. Fried and R. Polt. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. [1955] (1977), ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. W. Lovitt. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. [1962] (1972), ‘Summary of a Seminar on the Lecture “Time and Being”’, in On Time and Being. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Heller, A. (1979), A Theory of Feelings. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S. (2009), ‘Hegel’s Concept of Desire’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 47: 103–130.Google Scholar
Jurist, E. (2000), Beyond Hegel and Nietzsche: Philosophy, Culture, and Agency. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kalkavage, P. (2007), The Logic of Desire: An Introduction to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Philadelphia PA: Paul Dry.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1962), The Present Age, trans. A. Dru. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kisiel, T. (2013), ‘The Seminar of Winter Semester 1933–4 within Heidegger’s Three Concepts of the Political’, in M. Heidegger, Nature, History, State 1933–1934, trans. G. Fried and R. Polt. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Le Bon, G. [1895] (1960), The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Lumsden, S. (2014), Self-Consciousness and the Critique of the Subject: Hegel, Heidegger, and the Post-Structuralists. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1964), One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
McMullin, I. (2013), Time and the Shared World: Heidegger on Social Relations. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. (2015), Heidegger, History, and the Holocaust. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (1996), Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2011), Hegel on Self-Consciousness: Desire and Death in the Phenomenology of Spirit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Raffoul, F. (2002), ‘Heidegger and the Origins of Responsibility’, in F. Raffoul and D. Pettigrew, Heidegger and Practical Philosophy. Albany NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Raffoul, F. (2013), ‘Ethics’, in F. Raffoul and E. Nelson (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Raffoul, F. (2014), ‘The Question of Responsibility between Levinas and Heidegger’, in J. Drabinski and E. Nelson (eds.), Between Levinas and Heidegger. Albany NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (1981), Hegel Contra Sociology. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. [1960] (1976), Critique of Dialectical Reason, trans. A. Sheridan-Smith. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Schalow, F. (1998), ‘Language and the Social Roots of Conscience: Heidegger’s Less Traveled Path’, Human Studies 21:2: 141–156.Google Scholar
Scheler, M. [1913] (2008), The Nature of Sympathy, trans. P. Heath. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Scheler, M. [1924] (1980), Problems of a Sociology of Knowledge, trans. M. Frings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spengler, O. [1922] (1930), The Decline of the West, vol. 2, trans. C. F. Atkinson. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. (2007), ‘Retreat from Politics: The Cynic in Modern Times’, Polity 39:3: 384–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, E. (2000), Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities. Washington DC: ICS Publications.Google Scholar
Vogel, L. (1994), The Fragile ‘We’: The Ethical Implications of Heidegger’s Being and Time. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. [1925] (1947), The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (2012), Tragedy, Recognition, and the Death of God: Studies in Hegel and Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Withy, K. (2015), ‘Owned Emotions: Affective Excellence in Heidegger on Aristotle’, in D. McManus (ed.), Heidegger, Authenticity, and the Self: Themes from Division Two of Being and Time. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2012), Less than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2013), ‘Heidegger in the Foursome of Struggle, Historicity, Will and Gelassenheit ’, in M. Heidegger, Nature, History, State 1933–1934, trans. G. Fried and R. Polt. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2014), Absolute Recoil. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Zuidervaart, L. (2008), ‘Truth and Authentication: Heidegger and Adorno in Reverse’, in I. Macdonald and K. Ziarek (eds.), Adorno and Heidegger: Philosophical Questions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar