Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T14:00:13.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel, Naturalism and the Philosophy of Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2013

Alison Stone
Alison Stone*
Affiliation:
University of Lancastera.stone@lancaster.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

In this article I consider whether Hegel is a naturalist or an anti-naturalist with respect to his philosophy of nature. I adopt a cluster-based approach to naturalism, on which positions are more or less naturalistic depending how many strands of the cluster naturalism they exemplify. I focus on two strands: belief that philosophy is continuous with the empirical sciences, and disbelief in supernatural entities. I argue that Hegel regards philosophy of nature as distinct, but not wholly discontinuous, from empirical science and that he believes in the reality of formal and final causes insofar as he is a realist about universal forms that interconnect to comprise a self-organizing whole. Nonetheless, for Hegel, natural particulars never fully realize these universal forms, so that empirical inquiry into these particulars and their efficient-causal interactions is always necessary. In these two respects, I conclude, Hegel's position sits in the middle of the naturalism/anti-naturalism spectrum.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , May 2013 , pp. 59 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

von Äsch, A-G. (1941), Natural Science in German Romanticism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. (2002), German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism 1781-1801. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. (2005), Hegel. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, D. (1998), ‘Hegel's Appropriation of Kant's Account of Teleology in Nature’, in S. Houlgate (ed.), Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
d'Holbach, P.-H. T. (1835), System of Nature, trans. H. D. Robinson. 2 vols. New York: Matsell.Google Scholar
Gardner, S. (2007), ‘The Limits of Naturalism and the Metaphysics of German Idealism’, in E. Hammer (ed.), German Idealism: Contemporary Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gardner, S. (2011), ‘Idealism and Naturalism in the Nineteenth Century’, in A. Stone (ed.), The Edinburgh Critical History of Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970a), Philosophy of Nature, trans. M. J. Petry. 3 vols. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970b), Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften, Zweiter Teil: Die Naturphilosophie, ed. E. Moldenhauer and K. M. Michel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1929), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N. Kemp Smith. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1987), Critique of Judgment, trans. W. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Lenoir, T. (1982), The Strategy of Life: Teleology and Mechanics in Nineteenth-Century German Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. (2002), The Romantic Conception of Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1856), Von der Weltseele, in Sämmtliche Werke vol. II: 345-583.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1978), System of Transcendental Idealism, trans. P. Heath. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1988), Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature, trans. P. Heath and E. Harris. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1994), Idealism and the Endgame of Theory, ed. D. Snow. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (2004a), First Outline of a System of the Philosophy of Nature, trans. K. Peterson. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (2004b), ‘Introduction to the Outline of a System of the Philosophy of Nature’, in Schelling 2004a: 193-231.Google Scholar
Spicer, F. (2011), ‘Intuitions in Naturalistic Philosophy’, unpublished paper presented at Lancaster Philosophy research seminar.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2007), A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar