Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T02:04:06.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Race and Colonialism in Hegel's Philosophy of Religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2024

W. Ezekiel Goggin*
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar zeke.goggin@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Scholars have paid limited attention to the crucial relationship between Hegel's racism, his support for colonialism and his views on religion. This essay offers a critical reconstruction of how race and coloniality shape the question of religion (and vice versa) throughout Hegel's attempts to critique and ultimately vindicate European modernity. Paying special attention to the seminal role of ‘fetishism’ in his works, I argue that Hegel's intellectual concerns are racialized from the inception of his project. I conclude by suggesting an alternative philosophical approach to the concept of the ‘fetish’ and ‘fetishism’ to resist Hegel's racist and pro-colonial tendencies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Hegel Society of Great Britain

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernasconi, R. (1998), ‘Hegel at the Court of the Ashanti’, in Barnett, S. (ed.), Hegel After Derrida. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (2000) ‘With What Must History Begin? On the Racial Basis of Hegel's Eurocentrism, Nineteenth Century Contexts 22:2: 171201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (2003), ‘Will the Real Kant Please Stand Up?’, Radical Philosophy 117: 1322.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (2019), ‘A Most Dangerous Error’, Angelaki 24:2: 92103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonetto, S. (2006), ‘Race and Racism in Hegel’, Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 10: 3564Google Scholar
Buchwalter, A. (2011), Dialectics, Politics, and the Contemporary Value of Hegel's Practical Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buck-Morss, S. (2009), Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciccariello-Mahler, G. (2014), Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy - Revue de la philosophie française et de langue française XXII:1: 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, A. (2009), ‘Is Hegel's Philosophy of History Eurocentric?’, Proceedings of the Hegel Society of America 19: 87110.Google Scholar
Comay, R. (2011), Mourning Sickness: Hegel and the French Revolution. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2021), Glas, trans. D. Wills and G. Bennington. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, W.E.B. (2007), The Souls of Black Folk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dussel, E. (1993), ‘Eurocentrism and Modernity’, boundary 2 20:3: 6576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussel, E. (2014), ‘Anti-Cartesian Meditations: On the Origin of the Philosophical Anti-Discourse of Modernity’, Journal of Critical and Religious Theory 13: 1153.Google Scholar
Hammerschlag, S. (2021), ‘A Poor Substitute for Prayer: Sarah Kofman and the Fetish of Writing’, in Furey, C. et al., Devotion: Three Inquiries in Religion, Literature, and Political Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, H. S. (1972), Hegel's Development: Toward the Sunlight 1770–1801. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1948), Early Theological Writings, trans. Knox, T. M. and Kroner, R.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jean-Marie, V. (2018), Vodou Cosmology and the Haitian Revolution in the Enlightenment Ideals of Kant and Hegel. Kingston: University of the West Indies Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1793), Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft. Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1794), Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft. Second expanded edition. Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1914), Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 6. Berlin: Georg Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. A. (2011), Religion, Modernity, and Politics in Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascat, J. M. H. (2014), ‘Hegel and the Black Atlantic: Universalism, Humanism and Relation’, in Dhawan, N. (ed.), Decolonizing Enlightenment: Transnational Justice, Human Rights and Democracy in a Postcolonial World. Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
Matory, L. J. (2018), The Fetish Revisited: Marx, Freud, and the Gods Black People Make. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
McCarney, J. (2003), ‘Hegel's Racism? A Response to Robert Bernasconi’, Radical Philosophy 119: 3235.Google Scholar
Melsan, A. T. and Césaire, A. (1997), ‘The Liberating Power of Words’ (interview with Aimé Césaire), The UNESCO Courier: A Publication of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, May 1997.Google Scholar
Morris, R. C. and Leonard, D. H. (2017), The Returns of Fetishism: Charles de Brosses and the Afterlives of an Idea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nirenberg, D. (2013), Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pietz, W. (1985), ‘The Problem of the Fetish, I,’ RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 9: 517.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2001), Hegel: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, S. (2015), W. E. B. Du Bois and The Souls of Black Folk. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2020), ‘Hegel and Colonialism’, Hegel Bulletin 41:2: 247–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terada, R. (2019), ‘Hegel's Racism for Radicals’, Radical Philosophy 205: 1122.Google Scholar
Tibebu, T. (2011), Hegel and the Third World: The Making of Eurocentrism in World History. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Znamenski, A. A. (2007), The Beauty of the Primitive: Shamanism and the Western Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar