Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:58:55.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ENGLISH ‘FEMINIST’ WRITINGS AND JUDITH DRAKE'S AN ESSAY IN DEFENCE OF THE FEMALE SEX (1696)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2001

HANNAH SMITH
Affiliation:
Newnham College, Cambridge

Abstract

English ‘feminist’ writings of the late seventeenth century frequently united pro-woman arguments with party-political polemics. But although such texts have been discussed in terms of rationalist and contractarian philosophy, or as forerunners of modern feminist concerns, the contemporary issues which underscore them have been ignored. However, an understanding of these debates is vital to comprehending fully the motives of pro-woman writers, many of whom were more concerned with the survival of the Church of England than ameliorating the lot of seventeenth-century women. The underlying importance of party politics is exemplified in one of the greatest works of early modern ‘feminism’, Judith Drake's An essay in defence of the female sex (1696). Although Drake shared political similarities with other tory ‘feminists’, including the more celebrated Mary Astell, Drake's work differed radically from theirs over how an Anglican tory society could be maintained. Instead of stressing the necessity of teaching the tenets of Anglicanism to young women, as had her predecessors, Drake combined tory ideas with Lockean philosophy and concepts of ‘politeness’ to formulate an early Enlightenment vision of sociable, secularized, learning and the role female conversation could play in settling a society fractured by party politics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank Mark Goldie and Sylvana Tomaselli for reading earlier drafts of this article, and Rebecca Mills for permitting me to read her article, ‘That tyrant custom: the politics of custom in the poetry and prose of Augustan women writers’, Women's Writing, 7 (2000), pp. 391–409, prior to publication. I also wish to thank James Lawson, Archivist and Taylor Librarian of Shrewsbury School, Malcolm Underwood, Archivist of St John's College, Cambridge, and Catherine Broad of the Royal Society, London, for information concerning James Drake the elder and younger.