Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T19:40:58.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VI. France and the Making of the Entente Cordiale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2010

Christopher Andrew
Christopher Andrew
Affiliation:
Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The significance of the Entente Cordiale has often been disguised both by its own emotive title and by the subsequent development of Anglo-French relations. Vincent Auriol claimed on its fiftieth anniversary that ‘the convention of 8 April 1904 embodied the agreement of our two peoples on the necessity of safeguarding the spiritual values of which we were the common trustees’. Eden's interpretation on the same occasion was more prosaic and more accurate. ‘At the time when it was concluded’, he told the Commons, ‘the Entente Cordiale did not represent some great surge of public opinion on either side of the Channel. It was in fact an instrument of political policy at the time, calculated to attempt to remove the differences which had long complicated Anglo-French relations in Egypt and Morocco.’ The solution to these differences which was suggested to the English government by the French foreign minister, Théophile Delcassé, in July 1903, and which formed the basis of the agreement signed nine months later, was the barter of Egypt for Morocco. In all that has been written on the Entente Cordiale neither the origin of this barter nor the steps by which it became the foundation for the diplomatic reconciliation of France and England have ever been explained.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , 1967 , pp. 89 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Combes, Émile, Mon Ministère 1902-5 (Paris, 1956), pp. 217–20.Google Scholar

2 Hargreaves, J. D., Prelude to the Partition of West Africa (London, 1963), passim.Google Scholar

3 Headlam-Morley, J., Studies in Diplomatic History (London, 1930), p. 55.Google Scholar

4 Bibliothèque Universel (of which Tallichet was editor), 03 1892.Google Scholar

5 , Delcassé, ‘Par L'Épee’, National, 17 03 1892.Google Scholar

6 Faure MSS. XVIII. I am very grateful to M. Francois Berge for allowing me to use his grandfather's notes personnelles.

7 Maxse to J. Chamberlain, 12 October 1891, J. Chamberlain MSS., JC 5/53/26. I am grateful to the Trustees of the Chamberlain Papers for allowing me to make use of these papers.

8 Marchand to Terrier, 25 Nov. 1897, Terrier MSS. 5904. (Bibliothèque de l'lnstitut de France).

9 Bulletin du Comite de I'Afrique Française (hereafter BCAF), 03 1897.Google Scholar

10 See especially ‘La question d'Egypte devant les puissances européennes’, BCAF, 08 1895Google Scholar ; ‘L'Angleterre, le Soudan et le Transvaal’, BCAF, 05 1897Google Scholar ; ‘Apres la prise de Khartoum’, BCAF, 09 1898Google Scholar.

11 BCAF, 12 1899.Google Scholar

12 Étienne, ‘Notre Comit6 du Maroc’, BCAF, 01 1904.Google Scholar

13 A member of this group, Joseph Chailley-Bert, wrote of it in the Quinzaine Coloniale on 15 04 1904:Google Scholar

Nous étions cinq ou six, pressés autour de lui [Étienne], clairvoyants à force d'enthousiasme et inquiets à force de désir, qui faisions de ce problème [Morocco] l'objet principal de nos préoccupations. Le premier de tous, le premier en date et le premier aussi par sa perspicacité avait été M. Paul Bourde. Nous nous réunissions, de temps à autre, pour causer entre nous de notre cher Maroc. Nous nous efforçions de lui gagner des partisans. Nous lancions parfois dans la presse un ballon d'essai, nous jetions un coup de sonde dans Popinion. Mais nous savions que nous ne pouvions rien, sans les pouvoirs publics… M. Delcassé a eu la force de caractère de ne se laisser…irriter par nos conseils ou nos critiques.

14 Étienne, ‘L'Oeuvre des Comités Coloniaux’, BCAF, 07 1904.Google Scholar

15 ‘Appel du Comité du Maroc’, BCAF, 06 1904.Google Scholar

16 Caix, R. de, ‘Après l'accord’, BCAF, 05 1904Google Scholar ; Gaillard to Terrier, 9 Jan. 1905, Terrier MSS. 5909; cf. Morel, E. D., Morocco in Diplomacy (London, 1912), p. 111Google Scholar.

17 BCAF, 12 1894Google Scholar , Quinzaine Coloniale, 10 07 1898Google Scholar.

18 Étienne MSS. (Bibliothèque Nationale n.a.fr. 24327).

19 Speech by Chailley-Bert reported in Quinzaine Coloniale, 25 03 1900Google Scholar . The occupation of the Tuat oases shortly before was interpreted by Chailley-Bert as a first sign that Delcassé had begun a policy of action in Morocco.

20 Saint-Aulaire, Cte de, ‘Confession d'un vieux diplomate’ (Paris, 1953), p. 49.Google Scholar

21 Albéric Neton, who knew Delcassé well during his early career, described Egypt as his ‘grand tourment’ ( , Neton, Delcassé, Paris, 1952, p. 45)Google Scholar.

22 Note of 8 Dec. 1898, Quai d'Orsay archives, Egypte NS 20.

23 Documents Diplomatiques Franfais, 1871-1914 (hereafter DDF), 1st ser. vol. xv, nos. 76, 116.

24 Monson to Salisbury, 4 Nov. 1898, Salisbury MSS. A/117. I am grateful to the marquess of Salisbury for permission to use the papers of the third marquess.

25 Faure MSS. LVII; Masson, R., La marine française lors de la crise de Fachoda (Paris, unpublished), pp. 47–8.Google Scholar

26 British Documents on the Origins of the War, 1898-1914 (hereafter BD), vol. I, no. 238Google Scholar ; Maurois, A., Édouard VII et son temps (Paris, 1933), p. 90Google Scholar.

27 Delcassé to Barrère, 2 March 1899, copy in Delcassé MSS. I owe a great debt of gratitude t o the late Mme la Générale Noguès for allowing me to use her father's papers and for much help and encouragement.

28 BD, vol. I, no. 259.

29 Monger, G., The End of Isolation (London, 1963), p. 16.Google Scholar

30 Dugdale, B. E. C., Arthur James Balfour (London, 1936), 1, 257–8.Google Scholar

31 Maxse to J. Chamberlain, 8 Jan. 1900, J. Chamberlain MSS., JC 5/53/36.

32 Interview with the Russian paper Rossia, reprinted in the Paris press on 16 Dec. 1899.

33 I Documenti Diplomatic! Italiani, 3rd ser. vol. III, no. 336, DDF, 1st ser. vol. xvi, nos. 74, 79.

34 Révoil to Delcassé, 6 Feb. 1900, Delcassé MSS.

35 Delcassé to Barrère, 28 Feb. 1900, Delcassé MSS. A copy of this letter bearing the incorrect date of 28 June 1900 is printed in DDF, 1st ser. vol. XVI, no. 203. The letter was in reply to one from Barrère of 16 Feb. 1900 (Delcassé MSS.) and quotes several passages from it. By June 1900 Delcassé no longer intended to seek an agreement with Germany.

36 Delcassé to Barrere, 28 Feb. 1900, Delcassé MSS.; cf. Cambon, P., Correspondence (Paris, 1940-1946), II, 89Google Scholar.

37 , Monger, op. cit. p. 31.Google Scholar

38 , Delcassé, ‘Pauvres Anglais!’, Paris, 31 12 1886.Google Scholar

39 In a speech to the Chamber on 8 Feb. 1898 Delcassé had shown himself still proud of his share of responsibility for the Fashoda expedition. By September 1898, however, he believed that apparent changes in German policy had ‘profoundly modified’ the situation and that it was no longer wise for Marchand to continue to Fashoda (DDF, 1st ser. vol. XIV, no. 329).

40 DDF, 1st ser. vol. XVI, no. 59.

41 Combarieu, A., Sept ans à I'Élysée (Paris, 1932), p. 41Google Scholar ; DDF, 1st ser. vol. XVI, no. 90.

42 BD, vol. 1, no. 187; Meyendorff, A. F., Correspondance diplomatique du Baron de Staal (Paris, 1929), II, 453Google Scholar.

43 Diary entries by Brugere, 14 Dec. 1899 and 25 Jan. 1900. I am very grateful to His Excellency, M. Raymond Brugere, for allowing me to use his father's unpublished diary.

44 Sir Rodd, J. Rennell, Social and diplomatic memories (London, 1922), I, 266.Google Scholar

45 Diary entry by Brugere for 10 Feb. 1900.

46 Quai d'Orsay archives, figypte NS 17, 38; DDF, 1st ser. vol. XVI, nos. 61, 75.

47 , Meyendorff, op. cit. II, 448Google Scholar . Whether or not the Russian ambassador exaggerated these overtures (probably not), the important point is that his version was accepted by Muraviev and Delcassé.

48 DDF, 1st ser. XVI, 91 n.

49 Die grosse Politik der europāischen Kabinette 1871-1914 (hereafter GP), vol. XV, no. 4496 and fn. 2.

50 BD, vol. 1, nos. 203, 208; Reverseaux to Delcassé, 13 March 1901, Quai d'Orsay archives Autriche-Hongrie NS 24; Bompard to Delcassé, 18 March 1905, Delcassé MSS. For other examples of Delcassé's use of Hansen and the Matin to make overtures to Germany, see G.P. vol. XIII, no. 3558Google Scholar , vol. XX, ii, nos. 6608, 6609.

51 Herbert to Salisbury, 8 Feb. 1900, Salisbury MSS. A/118; Cf. I Documenti Diplomatic! Italiani, 3rd ser. vol. III, no. 268Google Scholar . Herbert was sceptical but underestimated Blowitz's source. In 1896 Hanotaux had used Hansen and a correspondent of the Matin to make overtures to Germany while avoiding, like Delcassé, formal advances.

52 DDF, 1st ser. vol. XVI, nos. 64, 90.

53 Quai d'Orsay archives, Grande Bretagne NS 12. Reference is made to this document in Grenville, J., Lord Salisbury and Foreign Policy (London, 1964), p. 289Google Scholar . Grenville asserts that Delcassé's aim was ‘a preventive war’ (op. cit. p. 271); in fact he realized the French fleet could not survive a war with England. See p. 94.

54 DDF, 1st ser. vol. xvi, no. 59.

55 , Cambon, op. cit. 11, 38–9.Google Scholar

56 Quai d'Orsay archives, Allemagne NS 27.

57 Ibid.

58 DDF, 1st ser. vol. xvi, no. 107; 2nd ser. vol. 1, no. 60, vol. 11, no. 219, vol. III, no. 383.

59 MS. memoir by Bihourd describing a conversation with Delcassé on 20 June 1904.

60 , Cambon, op. cit. 11, 89.Google Scholar

61 Ibid. p. 64; Faure MSS. XXIII, XXV, XXVII.

62 Monson to Lansdowne, 22 March 1901, Lansdowne MSS., vol. IX; cf. Lansdowne to Chamberlain, 16 March 1901, Chamberlain MSS. JC 11/21/5. Cambon later admitted that until 1903 Delcassé had refused to offer England compensation of this kind. See p. 101.

63 BD, vol. 11, no. 322. Lansdowne restated this opposition in October 1902 and Cambon once again failed to report the fact.

64 Cambon to Delcassé, 12 Aug. 1902, Delcassé MSS.

65 GP, vol. XVIII, no. 334. See p. 103.

66 DDF, 2nd ser. vol. 1, no. 558, vol. 11, no. 33; , Saint-René-Taillandier, Les Origines du Maroc Français (Paris, 1930), p. 34Google Scholar.

67 Waldeck-Rousseau MSS. 4566 (Bibliothèque de l'lnstitut de France).

68 , Monger, op. cit. pp. 111 ff.Google Scholar

69 , Combarieu, op. cit. p. 326Google Scholar ; , Cambon, op. cit. p. 95Google Scholar.

70 Andrew, C., ‘German World policy and the Reshaping of the Dual Alliance’, Journal of Contemporary History (07 1966), pp. 143–4.Google Scholar

71 Balasy to Delcassé, 20 Nov. 1902, Delcassé MSS.; DDF, 2nd ser. vol. 11, no. 552, vol. in, no. 49.

72 , Cambon, op. cit. II, 89.Google Scholar

73 MS. letter, Neton to Beau, 16 May 1903.

74 MS. letter, fitienne to Beau, 28 Dec. 1902.

75 Dispatches from the Spanish ambassador in Paris later quoted in the Spanish parliament (Diario de Sesiones, 8 06 1904).Google Scholar

76 MS. letters, Etienne to Beau, 10 May and 15 July 1903, Neton to Beau, 10 July 1903.

77 The author of this report, Morton Fullerton, revealed in L'Écho de Paris, 14 06 1937Google Scholar , that it was written ‘a la demande de Paul Cambon lui-meme’.

78 Monson to Lansdowne, 6 Feb. 1903, Lansdowne MSS. vol. ix.

79 Cromer to Lansdowne, 21 Feb. 1903, Lansdowne MSS. vol. vm. Cromer first openly supported the idea in a letter to Lansdowne of 29 May 1903.

80 Fullerton, M., Problems of Power (London, 1920), p. 57.Google Scholar

81 Dépêche Coloniale, 20 05 1903Google Scholar ; Pall Mall Gazette, 21 05 1903Google Scholar ; The Times, 22 05 1903Google Scholar ; Spectator, 23 05 1903Google Scholar ; National Review, 06 1903Google Scholar . There were also many less direct references to the barter proposal (e.g. Economist, 9 06 and 26 09 1903Google Scholar ) and almost the whole English press expressed its hope for an Anglo-French rapprochement after the royal visit. Cf. Dépêche Coloniale, 15 06 1903Google Scholar.

82 Rouvier to Delcassé 8 and 11 Apr. 1903, Quai d'Orsa y archives Grand e Bretagne NS 13; cf. DDF, 2nd ser. vol. III, no. 177.

83 , Combarieu, op. cit. p. 247.Google Scholar

84 MS. memoir by Bihourd. Cf. Paleologue, M., Un Grand Toumant de la Politique Mondiale (Paris, 1934), pp. 92–3Google Scholar.

85 DDF, 2nd ser. vol. III, no. 137. For some English statesmen fear of Germany was less important than fear of the consequences of a Russo-Japanese war. Delcassé was little influenced by this danger; even on the eve of the war early in 1904 he still believed it would not happen.

86 Note by Delcassé, 8 May 1903, Delcassé MSS.

87 Diary entry by Brugere, 12 May 1903.

88 Diary entries by Brugere, 3 and 7 June 1903.

89 Chailley-Bert to Delcassé, [early July] 1903, Delcassé MSS.

90 BD, vol. 11, no. 257.

91 Delcassé to his wife, 8 Apr. 1904, Delcassé MSS.