Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:34:36.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WALTER MORRELL AND THE NEW DRAPERIES PROJECT, c. 1603–1631

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2001

MICHAEL ZELL
Affiliation:
University of Greenwich

Abstract

This article explores the lengthy and convoluted history of a Jacobean project to set the idle poor to work making ‘new draperies’. Although the projector, Walter Morrell, convinced the Cecils, King James, and the privy council of the social and fiscal benefits of his scheme, he failed to persuade the Hertfordshire gentry. This case study in the formulation of crown economic policy, and in ‘Stuart paternalism’, draws upon Morrell's own detailed, unpublished treatise, as well as conventional political sources, and shows how the combination of ‘commonwealth’ rhetoric and progressive economic thinking could sway crown policy-making. It also demonstrates once again the limits of conciliar authority in early Stuart England. In the face of sustained provincial non-compliance, the privy council had neither the machinery nor the stomach to force the Hertfordshire elite to implement government policy and give meaningful support to a government-backed projector. And despite their inability to deal with growing rural unemployment, the Hertfordshire magistrates were unwilling to experiment with rural industry as a solution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to the Henry E. Huntington Library, San Marino, California, both for its archival and financial support, and for permission to cite MSS in its possession. My work there was advanced substantially by Drs Roy Ritchie and Mary Robertson, to whom I owe many thanks. Earlier versions of the article were read to seminars at Leicester, Cambridge, and Greenwich; suggestions and queries offered on those occasions have materially improved it. Steve Hindle, A. J. Slavin, and Joan Thirsk kindly read earlier drafts and commented to good effect.