Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
de Zayas, Alfred-Maurice
1993.
The German Expellees: Victims in War and Peace.
p.
13.
Article contents
The Wehrmacht bureau on war crimes*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2010
Abstract
On September 4, 1939, a special bureau was established within the legal department of the Wehrmacht with the task of ‘ascertaining violations of international law committed by enemy military and civilian persons against members of the German armed forces, and investigating whatever accusations foreign countries should make against the Wehrmacht’. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief overview of the material collected by the Germans during the war, to test the credibility of the German investigations, review case-studies and inquire into the integrity of the judges carrying out the investigations. The Wehrmacht bureau functioned from the very beginning until the final days of war. It investigated some 10,000 war crimes, of which the files for perhaps some 4,000 have survived. Half the files contain investigations of war crimes in the Soviet Union; the other volumes refer to war crimes allegedly committed by American, British, French, Polish, Yugoslav and other Allied nationals. After a careful review of the bureau's records and methods of operation, the conclusion is warranted that the investigations were carried out in a methodically correct manner and that many of the reports present prima facie cases that deserve further investigation. There remains thefundamental question of the judges' integrity, how it was possible for them to carry out investigations into Allied war crimes, when the German government, the SS, the Einsatzgruppen and the Wehrmacht were engaging in various degrees of official criminality. In search of an answer, the author reviews the testimony of numerous witnesses at the Nuremberg trials, including SS judge Georg Konrad Morgen, who had the commander of Buchenwald arrested on corruption charges, but was prevented from completing investigations into concentration camp killings. Hitler's order no. I concerning secrecy appears to have been largely observed, thus frustrating investigation attempts and keeping knowledge of the Holocaust relatively limited.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992
References
1 Bell, Johannes (ed.), Völkerrecht im Weltkrieg (Berlin 1927), II, pp. 185–6Google Scholar.
2 Geheimes Staatsarchiv Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Berlin), I.HA Rep. 84a, no. 11763, pp. 18–23.
3 International Committee of the Red Cross, Tenth International Conference, Geneva, 1921, Dixième Conference Internationale de la Croix Rouge, tenue à Genève du 30 mars au 7avril 1921, pp. 213–14.
4 Bell, Völkerrecht, vob. I-v.
5 Heeresverordnungsblatt 1939, Teil C, Blatt 26, 14 September 1939, p. 310.
6 I first learned of the records in 1974, when I was doing research for my book Nemesis at Potsdam, the expulsion of the Germans from the East (Lincoln, Nebraska, 4th revised edn, 1990.) My concern at the time was the flight and expulsion of the German civilian population from areas east of the Order-Neisse 1944 to 1948. The disorderly nature of the flight was linked to the fear of German civilians that Soviet soldiers would rape and kill them as in October 1944 when the Red army totally destroyed the village of Nemmersdorf in East Prussia. This area was retaken by a Wehrmacht counteroffensive one week later and the corpses were found. Had such a massacre occurred in an area occupied by the American army, our army lawyers would have investigated the killings as a matter of course. Thus I assumed that German military lawyers must have investigated the events at Nemmersdorf. In search of their investigations I learned of the existence of the Wehrmacht bureau on war crimes, and found the 226 volumes of German investigations of Allied war crimes going back to the very beginning of the warGoogle Scholar.
7 United States of America Alstötter, v. Josef et al., in Lauterpacht, Herscht, ed., Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases (London, 1947), case 126, pp. 278 ffGoogle Scholar.
8 Trial of Wilhelm von Leeb (OKW Trial, case 12), NSB, Proceedings of 16July 1948, p. 7726.
9 Roon, Ger van, “Graf Moltke als Völkerrechtler im OKW” in Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, XVIII (1970), pp. 12–61;Google ScholarMoltke, Freya von and Roon, G. van, Helmuth James Graf von Moltke, Dokumente (Berlin, 1986)Google Scholar.
10 Bösch, Hermann, Heeresrichter Karl Sack im Widerstand (Munich, 1967)Google Scholar; Hoffmann, Peter, The history of the German resistance 1935–1945 (London, 1977)Google Scholar.
11 Bundesarchiv-Militärarchiv, RW 2 v. 34, p. 2.
12 A. de Zayas, The Wehrmacht war crimes bureau, ch. 4.
13 Ibid. pp. 42f.
14 BA - MA, RW 2 v. 129, passim. See also ICRC, Report of its Activities during the Second World War (Geneva, 1948), I, pp. 333 et seq.
15 Zayas, A. dc, The Wehrmacht war crimes bureau, p. 50Google Scholar.
16 Ibid. p. 52.
17 Ibid. pp. 53.ff
18 Ibid. p. 63.
19 Bundesarchiv-Bern, 2021 (c), Classeur 66. The inquiry exposed gross negligence on the part of several American soldiers, and court-martial proceedings were recommended.
20 Zayas, A. de, The Wehrmacht war crimes bureau, pp. 97ffGoogle Scholar.
21 Public Record Office, ADM 199/1151, HMS Rorqual, Report of Proceedings, p. 164.
22 Public Record Office, AIR 8/827–03071.
23 International Committee of the Red Cross, Report of Activities, I, pp. 522–3. See also Böhme, Kurt, Die deulschen Kriegsgefangenen in französischer Hand (Munich, 1971)Google Scholar, in Maschke, , Zur Geschichte der deutschen Kriegsgefangenen. XIII, p. 155, n. 292Google Scholar.
24 Bundesarchiv-Militärarchiv, RW 2/v. 149, p. 124.
25 Bundesarchiv-Koblenz, Publikationsstelle Berlin-Dahlem, CLIII/1671.
26 The Sunday Telegraph, 7 January 1990. See also Gordon, Sarah, Hitler, the Germans and the Jewish question (Princeton, 1984), esp., pp. 140, 183–4Google Scholar.
27 Kogon, Eugen, Der SS-Staat (Munich, 1974), pp. 394–5Google Scholar.
28 Bosworth, Alan, America's concentration camps (New York, 1967), p. 120Google Scholar.
29 International Military Tribunal, X, pp. 536–7.
30 Laqueur, Walter, The terrible secret (London, 1980), p. 17Google Scholar; cf. Stokes, Lawrence, ‘The German people and the destruction of the European Jews’, in Central European History, VI (1973), pp. 167–91. The recent publications edited byCrossRefGoogle ScholarKlee, Ernst and Dressen, Willi, “Schöne zeiten”: Judenmord aus der Sicht der Täter und Gaffer (Frankfurt, 1988) andGoogle Scholar“Gott mil uns”: Der deutsche Vernichtungskrieg im Osten (Frankfurt, 1989),Google Scholar fail to reveal any knowledge of the Holocaust by the legal department of the Wehrmacht or by bureau members.
31 Hoffmann, Peter, German resistance to Hitler (Cambridge, Mass., 1988), pp. 131–5;Google Scholar see also ‘Motive’, chapter in Schmädeke, J. and Steinbach, P. (eds.), Der Widerstand gegen den National sozialismus (Munich, 1985), pp. 1089–96.Google Scholar I.M.T. XXXIII, p. 424; Hassell, Ulrich von, Vom anderen Deutschland (Zurich 1947), p. 314Google Scholar.
32 I.M.T., XVII, p. 181; see also the testimony of Field Marshal Erhard Milch on 11 March 1946, IMT, IX, pp. 72–4.
33 I.M.T., XXI, p. 533.
34 I.M.T., XX, p. 510.
35 Ibid. p. 511.
36 Ibid. p. 514.
37 Institut für Zeitgeschichte, 25–1931.
38 I.M.T., XV, pp. 332–3.
39 Ibid. XIII, p. 301.
40 Lüdde-Neurath, Walther, Regierung Dönitz (Göttingen 1964), pp. 91ff.Google Scholar Interview on 27 May 1974 with Karl Dönitz at Aumühle, Holstein. Dönitz, Karl, Zehn Jahre und Zwanzig Tage (Frankfurt, 1967), p. 461Google Scholar.
41 Helmut Krausnick, ‘The persecution of the Jews’, in Buchheim, Hans, Broszat, Martin and Jacobsen, Hans Adolf, Anatomy of the SS state (New York, 1968), p. 97Google Scholar.
42 Hilberg, Raul, The destruction of the European Jews (Chicago, 1961), pp. 621f, 652f, 662ffGoogle Scholar.
- 1
- Cited by