No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Precolonial History of the Owan People: A Research Agenda
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 May 2014
Extract
The trend in precolonial Nigerian historiography has been the attempt to concentrate studies on prominent kingdoms, major ethnic nationalities, and coastal communities. Consequently, the histories of acephalous societies have been neglected by historians. A. E. Afigbo once warned Nigerian historians against the danger inherent in the overconcentration of research on the history of megastates to the neglect of ministates, arguing that the history of the smaller polities should not be presented as footnotes to the history of major states.
The raison d'être of this paper is to draw attention of historians to one of these neglected communities, the Owan peoples of Nigeria. They inhabit Owan Local Government Area of Bendel State, and consist of eleven clans: Emai, Ighue, Ihievbe, Ikao, Iuleha, Ivbiadaobi, Evbiomoin, Ora, Otuo, Ozalla, and Uokha. Linguistically, they belong to the Edo-speaking people centered in Benin. While it is true that Owan history has been neglected, that of their women suffers doubly because of their gender and as members of the society. Clearly such questions as what Owan society has been like in the past; how it has come to be what it is; what factors operate within it; what currents and forces move the people; and what general and personal factors have shaped events in the area should be the concern of historians interested in Owan history. In answering these questions the origins of the people and the evolution of precolonial sociopolitical institutions should be investigated. The economic arrangements which have sustained the society over the years will no doubt be of interest to would-be researchers. In addition, the links between the various groups and clans in term of trade, politics, and social relations should be studied. An examination of precolonial judicial arrangements and how they coped with crime and punishment will lead to an understanding of the currents within Owan society. Since all societies are dynamic, changes which occurred in the precolonial setting may reveal the resilience of indigenous institutions. Any reconstruction of Owan history must of necessity examine published, archival, and oral evidence. It is hoped that this research agenda will spur historians to focus attention on major aspects of Owan history—origins, economic, political, and social relations—with equal attention to the roles of men and of women.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © African Studies Association 1991
References
Notes
1. Afigbo, A. E., “The Bene ‘Mirage’ and the History of South Central Nigeria,” Nigeria Magazine, no. 137 (1981), 17–24.Google Scholar
2. Ohikhokhai, R. I., “Owan and the Benin Kingdom: An Analysis of a Relationship up to the 20th Century” (M.A. thesis, University of Benin, 1986).Google Scholar
3. Occupational groups like farmers, hunters, craftsmen and women, traders, priests and priestesses of shrines should be interviewed individually and in groups.
4. See Nwauwa, O., “The Dating of the Aro Chiefdom: A Synthesis of Correlated Genealogies,” HA, 17 (1990), 227–45Google Scholar, for a detailed discussion of the correlation of genealogies.
5. See, Bradbury, R. E., The Benin Kingdom and the Edo-Speaking Peoples of South-Western Nigeria (London, 1964), 86Google Scholar; see also H. F. Marshall, “Intelligence Report on the Ivbiosakon clans in Ishan and Kukuruku Divisions, Benin Province, 1937,” part I, 9.
6. Bradbury, , Benin Kingdom, 86.Google Scholar
7. Ibid., 129.
8. Sargent, R. A., “Politics and Economics in the Benue Basin, c. 1300-1700,” (Ph.D., Dalhousie University, 1984).Google Scholar
9. Ibid., 129.
10. Webster, J. B., “Pre-Dynastic Uromi: A Model I,” History Department Seminar, Bendel State University, Ekpoma, Nigeria, 1985.Google Scholar
11. Sargent, , “Politics and Economics,” 29.Google Scholar
12. For more details see Belasco, B. I., The Entrepreneur as Culture Hero (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
13. Unomah, A. C. and Webster, J. B., “Deities and Divinities as Sources of Pre-History,” in Webster, J. B. and Sargent, R. A., eds., The Theory and Practice of Oral Methodology: A Practical Handbook, in preparation.Google Scholar
14. Ibid.
15. Ibid.
16. Belasco, Entrepreneur.
17. See Thomas, N. W., “Totemism in Southern Nigeria,” Anthropos, 10/11 (1915/1916), 234–48.Google Scholar See also Goldenweiser, A. A., “The Method of Investigating Totemism,” Anthropos, 10/11 (1915/1916), 256–65.Google Scholar
18. J. B. Webster put forward these assumptions in a discussion with the writer on a number of issues surrounding totemism as a methodological device for historical reconstruction.
19. Bradbury, , Benin Kingdom, 85.Google Scholar
20. Wilson, James F. M., “Guinea Fowl and Bushbuck in Toro” in Webster, J. B., ed., A History of Uganda: Migration and Settlement, ca. 900-1900, forthcoming.Google Scholar
21. Ataba, F. B., “Recent Developments in the Use of Non-Documentary Evidence in African Historiography, With Special Reference to Totemism and Regional Chronology,” (M.A. thesis, Dalhousie Univeristy, 1976), 41.Google Scholar
22. Marshall, , “Intelligence Report,” part II, 4.Google Scholar
23. Ibid., part I, 9.
24. Malinowski, Bronislaw, Magic, Science and Religion (Chicago, 1948).Google Scholar
25. Miller, John, “The Biu Plateau: Establishing a Chronology and the Linkages Between Bura-Babur and Kwararafa” (M.A. thesis, Dalhousie Universtiy, 1984).Google Scholar
26. Buchanan, Carole, “Courts, Clans, and Chronology in the Kitara complex” in Webster, J. B., ed., Chronology, Migration and Drought in Interlacustrine Africa (London, 1979), 87–122.Google Scholar
27. Thomas, N. W., Anthropological Report on the Edo-Speaking Peoples of Nigeria (London, 1910), 9.Google Scholar