1 In the Reader's Guide to Periodical Literature during 1922–1930, the volume of “educational research and experimentation” topics more than doubled, and eclipsed growth in all other topics in the “applied” and “pure” science areas. Hornell Hart, “Changing Social Attitudes and Interests” in Recent Social Trends in the United States ed. President's Research Committee on Social Trends (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1933), 393, table 3; Mailer, J. B. “Forty Years of Psychology,” Psychological Bulletin 31 (October 1934): 533–559, on 544; O'Donnell, John The Origins of Behaviorism: American Psychology, 1870–1920 (New York: New York University Press, 1985), 226–237. For notes on psychological markets, see Petrina, Stephen “‘The Never-To-Be-Forgotten Investigation’: Cole, Luella W. Pressey, Sidney L. and Mental Surveying in Indiana, 1918–1921,” History of Psychology 4 (August 2001): 245–271, on 262–265.Google Scholar

2 Freeman, Frank “Psychology as the Source of Fundamental Assumptions in Education,” Educational Administration and Supervision 14 (October 1928): 371–377, on 371; O'Brien, F. P. “Employing Student Criticism in Reviewing Courses in Education,” Educational Administration and Supervision 11 (October 1925): 394–398.Google Scholar

3 Freud is mentioned in just one (i.e., Hilgard) of the following histories of educational psychology. This absence of Freud and psychoanalysis is merely a historiographic error rather than any statement on reality. See David Berliner, “The 100 Year Journey of Educational Psychology,” in Exploring Applied Psychology: Origins and Critical Analysis eds. Anastasi, Anne Berliner, David Landy, Frank Salzinger, Kurt and Strupp, Hans (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1993), 37–78; Charles, Don C. “The Emergence of Educational Psychology,” in Historical Foundations of Educational Psychology eds. Gover, John A. and Ronning, Royce R. (New York: Plenum, 1987), 17–38; Davidson, Emily S. and Benjamin, Ludy T. “A History of Child Study Movement in America,” in Historical Foundations of Educational Psychology eds. Glover, John A. and Ronning, Royce R. (New York: Plenum, 1987), 41–60; Dapeape, Marc “Differences and Similarities in the Development of Educational Psychology in Germany and the United States Before 1945,” Paedagogica Historica 33 (February 1997): 69–97; Feldhusen, John “Two Views on the Development of Educational Psychology,” Educational Psychologist 12 (Fall 1978): 297–304; Glaser, Robert “Instructional Psychology: Past, Present, and Future,” American Psychologist 37 (March 1982): 292–305; Hilgard, Ernst “History of Educational Psychology,” in Handbook of Educational Psychology eds. Berliner, David and Calfee, Robert (New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1996), 990–1004; Parke, Ross Ornstein, Peter Reiser, John and Zahn-Waxier, Carolyn eds., A Century of Developmental Psychology (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1994); Watson, Robert I. “A Brief History of Educational Psychology,” The Psychological Record 11 (Spring 1961): 209–242; Woodridge, Adrian Measuring the Mind: Education and Psychology in England, c. 1860–1990 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

4 For historiography of testing, see Petrina, Stephen “Getting a Purchase on ‘The School of the Future’ and Its Constituent Commodities: Histories and Historiographies of Technologies,” History of Education Quarterly 42 (Spring 2002): 75–111, on 86–91; For Foucauldian approaches to testing and psychology, see Hogan, David “Examinations, Merit, and Morals: The Market Revolution and Disciplinary Power in Philadelphia's Public Schools, 1838–1868,” Historical Studies in Education 4 (Spring 1992): 31–78; idem., “The Market Revolution and Disciplinary Power: Lancaster, Joseph and the Psychology of the Early Classroom System,” History of Education Quarterly 29 (Fall 1989): 381–417.Google Scholar

5 On this issue, see Gleason, Mona “The History of Education and the History of Psychology: What can Interdisciplinary Research Offer?,” Historical Studies in Education 9 (Spring 1997): 98–106. For educational psychology in education history, see Church, Robert “Educational Psychology and Social Reform in the Progressive Era,” History of Education Quarterly 11 (Winter 1971): 390–405; Joncich, Geraldine “Whither Thou Educational Scientist,” Teachers College Record 64 (October 1962): 1–12; idem., The Sane Positivist: A Biography of Edward L. Thorndike (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1968); Powell, Arthur “Speculations on the Early Impact of Schools of Education on Educational Psychology,” History of Education Quarterly 11 (Winter 1971): 406–412; Selleck, Richard “The Scientific Educationists, 1870–1914,” British Journal of Educational Studies 15 (Fall 1967): 148–165; Selleck, Richard The New Education, 1870–1914 (London: Pitman, 1968).Google Scholar

6 Critical psychologists have not shown much interest in the interrelations between education and psychoanalysis. Burman, Erica Deconstructing Developmental Psychology (New York: Routledge, 1994); Gilham, Bill ed., Reconstructing Educational Psychology (London: Croom Helm, 1978); Cravens, Hamilton Before Head Start: The Iowa Station and America's Children (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1993); Gleason, Mona Normalizing the Ideal: Psychology, Schooling and the Family in Post-World War II Canada (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1999); Ingleby, David “The Psychology of Child Psychology,” Human Context 5 (Fall 1973): 557–568; Popkewitz, Thomas S. “Dewey, Vygotsky, and the Social Administration of the Individual: Constructivist Pedagogy as Systems in Historical Spaces,” American Educational Research Journal 4 (Winter 1998): 535–570; Sigmon, Scott B. Radical Analysis of Special Education: Focus on Historical Development and Learning Disabilities (New York: Falmer Press, 1987); Richardson, Theresa The Century of the Child: The Mental Hygiene Movement and Social Policy in the United States and Canada (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989); Rose, Nikolas The Psychological Complex (London: Routledge, 1985); idem., Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (London: Routledge, 1989); idem., “Engineering the Human Soul: Analyzing Psychological Expertise,” Science in Context 5 (Fall 1992): 351–369; Shea, Christine Mary “The Ideology of Mental Health and the Emergence of the Therapeutic Liberal State,” (Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1980).Google Scholar

7 Gates, Arthur I. quoted in Editor, “Declares Teaching System Shows Wastage of Labor,” Teachers College Record 34 (Fall 1932): 72; Pressey, Sidney L. Psychology and the New Education (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1933), 584. Neither triumphalist nor revisionist histories of progressive education treat psychology with any nuance. Both have done considerable damage to our understandings of psychology in education. For progressive education, see Lawrence Cremin, The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education, 1876–1957 (New York: Knopf, 1961). For revisions of Cremin's rosy picture of progressive education, see Joel Spring, “Education and Progressivism,” History of Education Quarterly 10 (Spring 1970): 53–71; Cohen, Ronald D. and Mohl, Raymond A. The Paradox of Progressive Education: The Gary Plan and Urban Schooling (Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1979); Zilversmit, Arthur Changing Schools: Progressive Education Theory and Practice, 1930–1960 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993). Mirel, Jeffrey E. “Progressive School Reform in Comparative Perspective,” in Southern Cities, Southern Schools: Public Education in the Urban South eds. Plank, David N. and Ginsberg, Rick (New York: Greenwood Press, 1990), 151–174. Mirel's more recent essay forces progressive education through Cremin's funnel with a regressive historiography. Mirel, Jeffrey “Old Educational Ideas, New American Schools: Progressivism and the Rhetoric of Educational Revolution,” Paedagogica Historica 39 (August 2003): 477–497. For individualization, see Courtis, Stuart A. “Individualization in Education,” University of Michigan School of Education Bulletin 1 (January 1930): 52–54. For the contradictions among individualization, progressivism, and mass education, see Stephen Petrina, “Sidney Pressey and the Automation of Education, 1924–1934,” Technology and Culture 45 (April 2004): 305–330.Google Scholar

8 Educational psychology was defined in the 1900s to address “problems of mental development, heredity, adolescence, and the inexhaustible field of child study—the study of individual differences, of retarded and precocious development, the psychology of the ‘special class,’ the psychology of mental tests, the correlation of mental abilities, the psychology of special methods in the several school branches, [and] the important problems of mental hygiene.” “Editorial,” Journal of Educational Psychology 1 (January 1910): 2; Freyd, Max “What is Applied Psychology?, Psychological Review 33 (April 1926): 308–314, on 309, 314; Coon, Deborah “Standardizing the Subject,” Technology and Culture 34 (October 1993): 757–783, on 777. For this issue in Titchener's work, see Evans, Rand B. “E. B. Titchener on Scientific Psychology and Technology,” in Portraits of Pioneers in Psychology eds. Kimble, Greg A. and Wertheimer, Michael (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1991), 89–104. For the history of applied psychology, see Napoli, Donald S. Architects of Adjustment: The History of the Psychological Profession In the United States (Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1981).Google Scholar

9 For schools of psychology, see Adams, Grace Psychology: Science or Superstition? (London: Rider & Company, 1932), 249; Bode, Boyd Conflicting Psychologies of Learning (New York: Heath, 1929); Heidbreder, Edna Seven Psychologies (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1933); Krantz, David. L. ed., Schools of Psychology: A Symposium (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969); Wickham, Harvey The Misbehaviorists (New York: Dial Press, 1928); Williams, A. “Five Behaviorisms,” American Journal of Psychology 43 (March 1931): 337–360; Woodworth, Robert S. Contemporary Schools of Psychology (New York: Ronald Press, 1931). For psychology's paradigms in history, see Buss, Alan R. “The Structure of Psychological Revolutions,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 14 (Winter 1978): 57–64; Leahey, Thomas H. “The Mythical Revolutions of American Psychology,” American Psychologist 47 (April 1992): 308–318; Palermo, David S. “Is a Scientific Revolution Taking Place in Psychology?,” Science Studies 1 (April 1971): 135–155; Weimer, Walter and Palermo, David S. “Paradigms and Normal Science in Psychology,” Science Studies 3 (July 1973): 211–244.Google Scholar

10 Culture here is a repertoire or “toolkit.” Swindler, Ann “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies,” American Sociological Review 51 (April 1986): 273–286. For social epistemology, see Fuller, Steve “Social Epistemology and the Research Agenda of Science Studies,” in Science as Practice and Culture ed. Pickering, Andrew (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), 390–428. For pragmatism in scientific practice, see Clarke, Adele E. and Fujimura, John The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

11 Fenton, Norman Goodenough, Florence Hollingworth, Leta Stetter and Shakow, David were among those whose rite of passage into psychology was through hospitals in the 1910s and early 1920s. For Boston Psychopathic, see Gay, Frederick P. The Open Mind: Elmer Ernest Southard, 1876–1920 (New York: Normandie House, 1938), 124; Lunbeck, Elizabeth The Psychiatric Persuasion: Knowledge, Gender and Power in Modern America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994). For psychological internships and training, see Crane, Loyal “A Plea for the Training of Psychologists,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 20 (July 1955): 228–233; Morrow, William “The Development of Psychological Internship Training,” Journal of Consulting Psychology 10 (July 1946): 165–183; Shakow, David “An Internship for Psychologists (with Special Reference to Hospitals),” Journal of Consulting Psychology 2 (April 1938): 73–76; Terman, Lewis “Professional Training for Mental Hygiene,” Popular Science Monthly 80 (March 1912): 289–297; Watson, Robert I. “Training of Clinical Psychologists,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 22 (Spring 1952): 140–152; idem., “A Brief History of Clinical Psychology,” Psychological Bulletin 50 (September 1953): 321–346.Google Scholar

12 For Cole and Pressey at IU and their tests, see Petrina, “The Never-to-be Forgotten Investigation“; Pressey, Sidney L. “Pressey,” 1 March 1975, Record Group No. 40, Box No. 49, Folder No. 2, Record No. 20, Pressey, Sidney L. Papers, The Ohio State University Archives [hereafter cited as Record, Date, RG x/x/x/x, Pressey Papers, OSU Archives]. With the biological and social sciences accommodating female faculty and students more readily than the physical sciences during the first third of the twentieth century, adjustments were necessarily made for couples in fields such as psychology.Google Scholar

13 Boring, Edwin G. “Report of the Secretary,” Psychological Bulletin 18 (January 1921): 64; Boring, Edwin G. “Statistics of the American Psychological Association in 1920,” Psychological Bulletin 17 (August 1920): 271–278; Morton, R. L. “Can We Lift Ohio 22 Notches?,” Journal of Educational Research 3 (January 1921): 73; Buckingham, Burdette R. “The Progress of Tests and Measurements in Ohio,” Educational Research Bulletin 3 (September 1922): 203–207, on 206, 207.Google Scholar

14 Arps, George F. “Report of the College of Education for the year ending June 30, 1922“ in 52nd Annual Report of The Board of Trustees of The Ohio State University For the Year Ending June 30, 1922 (Columbus: OSU, 1922), 112–113.Google Scholar

15 O'Donnell, The Origins of Behaviorism, 216.Google Scholar

16 Arps, “Report of the College of Education for the year ending June 30, 1922,” 123; Summer school not included. Arps, George F. “Report of the College of Education for the year ending June 30, 1924” in 52nd Annual Report of The Board of Trustees of The Ohio State University For the Year Ending June 30, 1924 (Columbus: OSU, 1924), 51; “College of Education,” in The Ohio State University Catalog, 1921–1922 (Columbus: OSU, 1922), 178–180.Google Scholar

17 Boring, “Statistics of the American Psychology,” 273. See also O'Donnell, The Origins of Behaviorism, 2 14–224; Wherry, Robert J. A Statistical History of the Department of Psychology at The Ohio State University, 1907–1968, The Ohio State University Centennial Histories, College of Psychology (Columbus: OSU, 1968), 9–10; Arps, George F. “Report of the College of Education for the year ending June 30, 1923” in 53rd Annual Report of The Board of Trustees of The Ohio State University For the Year Ending June 30, 1923 (Columbus: OSU, 1923), 85; On Iowa, for example, see Peterson, Julia J. The Iowa Testing Programs: The First Fifty Years (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1983).Google Scholar

18 For gender in the history of psychology, see Bohan, Janis S. “Introduction,” in Seldom Seen, Rarely Heard: Women's Place in Psychology ed. Bohan, Janis S. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992); Scarborough, Elizabeth and Furumoto, Laurel Untold Lives: The First Generation of American Psychologists (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987), 133–173; Furumoto, Laurel “Placing Women in the History of Psychology,” American Psychologist 41 (February 1986): 35–42; O'Connell, Agnes N. and Russo, Nancy F. Models of Achievement: Reflections of Eminent Women in Psychology (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983); O'Connell, Agnes N. and Russo, Nancy F. Models of Achievement, Volume II (Hillsdale, NJ: Larwence Erlbaum, 1988); O'Connell, Agnes N. and Russo, Nancy F. Women in Psychology: A Bio-Bibliographic Sourcebook (New York: Greenwood Press, 1990); Rossiter, Margaret Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982); Gwendolyn Stevens and Sheldon Gardner, The Women of Psychology, Volumes I and II (Cambridge: Schenkman, 1982).Google Scholar

19 Courses paired with labs were collapsed and counted as a single entity. “Psychology,” in The Ohio State University Bulletin 25 (Columbus: OSU, 1921), 380–384; Pressey, Luella Cole “Dear 1916,” The Speedometer, of the Class of 1916 of Vassar College (August 1920): 1 (Vassar College Libraries, Special Collections); Pressey to Yerkes, 191918 February Yerkes Papers, Yale University Special Collections and Manuscripts; Pressey, Sidney L. Pressey, Luella W. and Corbet, Helen “Research Adventures in University Teaching,” School and Society 20 (November 1924): 635–638, on 635.Google Scholar

20 Pressey, Luella Cole [untitled entry], The Speedometer, of the Class of 1916 of Vassar College (2 February 1922): 2 (Vassar College Libraries, Special Collections).Google Scholar

21 “Psychology,” in The Ohio State University Bulletin 26 (Columbus: OSU, 1922), 363; “The Work of Instructors, 1921–1922,” in 52nd Annual Report of The Board of Trustees of The Ohio State University For the Year Ending June 30, 1922 (Columbus: OSU, 1922), 262; Pressey, Sidney L. and Pressey, Luella C. “A Revision of the Pressey Primer and Cross-Out Scales,” Journal of Educational Research 6 (September 1922): 178–179; Cole, [untitled entry]. For Cole and Pressey's tests, see Petrina, “The Never-to-be-Forgotten.”Google Scholar

22 “The Work of Instructors, 1921–1922,” 261; “The Work of Instructors, 1922–1923,” in 53rd Annual Report of The Board of Trustees of The Ohio State University For the Year Ending June 30, 1923 (Columbus: OSU, 1923), 249; “The Work of Instructors; 1923–1924,” in 54th Annual Report of The Board of Trustees of The Ohio State University For the Year Ending June 30, 1924 (Columbus: OSU, 1924), 218–219; “Psychology,” in The Ohio State University Bulletin 26 (Columbus: OSU, 1922), 360.Google Scholar

23 For the laws of learning, see Petrina, “Sidney Pressey and the Automation,” 316–317; Davis, Robert A. and Ballard, C.R. “The Development of Research in Learning,” Journal of Educational Research 23 (December 1932): 226–235; Rexroad, Carl N. “Outline of the Conditions Under Which Learning Occurs,” Psychological Review 39 (February 1932): 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Remmers, H. H. and Knight, F. B. “The Teaching of Educational Psychology in the United States,” Journal of Educational Psychology 13 (September 1922): 399–407, on 405; Douglas, O. B. “The Present Status of the Introductory Course in Educational Psychology in American Institutions of Learning,” Journal of Educational Psychology 16 (September 1925): 396–408, on 403; Watson, Goodwin “What Shall be Taught in Educational Psychology?,” Journal of Educational Psychology 17 (October 1926): 577–599; Weeks, Helen Foss Pickens, H. D. and Roudebush, R. I. “A Comparative Study of Recent Texts in Psychology, Educational Psychology and Principles of Teaching” Journal of Educational Psychology 21 (July 1930): 327–340; Worcester, Dean A. “The Wide Diversities of Practice in First Courses in Educational Psychology,” Journal of Educational Psychology 18 (1927): 11–17, on 15; See also Blue, Harold G. “An Analysis of Five Texts in Educational Psychology,” Phi Delta Kappan 11 (January 1928): 41–45; Hall-Quest, Alfred L. “Present Tendencies in Educational Psychology,” Journal of Educational Psychology 6 (October 1915): 601–614; Morawski, Jill “There is More to Our History of Giving,” American Psychologist 47 (March 1992): 161–169.Google Scholar

25 Freeman, Frank N. “Courses in Educational Psychology in Colleges, Universities and Normal Schools,” in College Courses in Education, 8th Yearbook of the National Society of College Teachers of Education ed. Courtis, Stuart A. (Marshalltown, IA: Marshall Printing, 1919), 43–61, on 47; Jarrett, Robert P. “Status of Courses in Psychology in State Teachers Colleges in the United States,” George Peabody College For Teachers Contributions to Education 47 (1928): 1–108; Douglas, “The Present Status,” 399; Woody, Clifford “The Administration of the Psychology Prerequisite to Courses in Education,” Journal of Educational Psychology 11 (January 1920): 61–77, on 65.Google Scholar

26 Pressey, Sidney “Suggestions Looking Toward a Closer Contact With Practical Problems in Work With Educational Tests,” School and Society 13 (June 1921): 710–716, on 715; Pressey, Sidney L. “Psychological and Educational Test Section,” Educational Research Bulletin 1 (January 1922): 30; “The Second Educational Conference,” Educational Research Bulletin 1 (January 1922): 62; The 1922 Conference Committee, “Proceedings of the Second Annual Educational Conference,” Educational Research Bulletin 2 (January 1923): 8; Pressey, Sidney L. “A New Series of Intelligence Tests,” in “Proceedings of the Second Annual Educational Conference at The Ohio State University, March 23–25, 1922,” The Ohio State University Bulletin 27 (June 1923): 171–173, on 171.Google Scholar

27 Pressey, Luella Cole “Luella Cole Pressey,” The Speedometer (June 1923): 6 (Vassar College Libraries, Special Collections).Google Scholar

28 Pressey, Luella Cole “Luella Cole Pressey,” The Speedometer (December 1924): 10; Brown to Pressey, L. C. 10 April 1925, 3/e/37/15, William Oxley Thompson Papers, OSU Archives; Pressey, L. C. to Arps, 16 April 1925, 3/e/37/15, William Oxley Thompson Papers, OSU Archives.Google Scholar

29 Pressey, Luella Cole Some College Students and Their Problems (Columbus: OSU, 1929); idem., “The Use of Quantitative Measurement in Educational Diagnosis and in Evaluating Remedial Instruction,” in Quantitative Measurements in Instruction of Higher Learning ed. Courtis, Stuart (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1930), 164–177; Ferguson, Jessie Mary “The Diagnosis and Rehabilitation of Probation Students,” (Ph.D. diss., Ohio State University, 1927); Leatherman, Emily “Anticipating Student Failures,” Educational Research Bulletin 5 (January 1926): 11–13. This program eventually became the counseling psychology program at OSU. Schmidt, Lyle and Chock, Stephen “Counseling Psychology at Ohio State University: The First 50 Years,” Journal of Counseling and Development 68 (Fall 1990): 276–281; Cohen, Sol “The Mental Hygiene Movement and the Development of Personality: Changing Conceptions of the American College and University, 1920–1940,” History of Higher Education Annual 2 (Summer 1982): 65–93. Arps, George F. “Report of the College of Education for the Year Ending June 30, 1925,” in 55th Annual Report of The Board of Trustees of The Ohio State University For the Year Ending June 30, 1925 (Columbus: OSU, 1925), 58, 59.Google Scholar

30 Duniway, Thompson to 22 August 1923, 3/e/37/15, William Oxley Thompson Papers, OSU Archives.Google Scholar

31 Weiss, Albert P. “The Psychological Laboratory of Ohio State University,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 10 (1927): 43 4–445, on 439.Google Scholar

32 Pressey, S. L. and Pressey, L. C. to Rightmire, 2, 1926 6 July Rightmire 3/f/40/7, George W. Papers, OSU Archives (Hereafter cited as Rightmire Papers, OSU Archive); Burt Nash, “A Statistical Study of the Development of Standardized Tests Over the Past Twenty Years” (Ph.D. diss., The Ohio State University, 1928).Google Scholar

33 Cattell, James McKeen ranked these three institutions as the best in the country. Arps to Rightmire, 1927 26 July 4, 3/f/40/8, Rightmire Papers, OSU Archives; Wherry, A Statistical History, 9–10; Arps, George F. “Report of the College of Education for the year ending June 30, 1926“ in 56th Annual Report of The Board of Trustees of The Ohio State University For the Year Ending June 30, 1926 (Columbus: OSU, 1926), 78; Pressey, S. L. and Pressey, L. C. to Rightmire, 1, 6 July 1926, Rightmire Papers, 3/f/40/7, OSU Archives.Google Scholar

34 Pressey, Sidney L. and Pressey, Luella Cole Introduction to the Use of Standard Tests (New York: World Book Company, 1922), 26; Bliss, D. C. “Review of Introduction to the Use of Standard Tests, by Pressey, Sidney L. and Cole, Luella W. “ Journal of Educational Research 4 (1923): 63.Google Scholar

35 Pressey, Sidney L. and Pressey, Luella C. “Practical ‘Educational Engineering’ in a Teacher Training Course,” School and Society (1932): 70; Metcalf, Arthur A. “Diagnostic Testing and Remedial Teaching,” School Executives Magazine 49 (1930): 358–360, on 358, 360.Google Scholar

36 Pressey, Sidney L. and Pressey, Luella Cole Mental Abnormality and Deficiency (New York: MacMillan, 1926), v, 297, 299, 280; “Psychology,” in The Ohio State University Bulletin 25 (Columbus: OSU, 1930), 208; For this thorough mix of behaviorism and Freud in educational psychology, see e.g., Burnham, William H. The Normal Mind (New York: Appleton, 1927).Google Scholar

37 Cole, and Pressey, Mental Abnormality and Deficiency, 292–312; Gesell, Arnold “Mental Hygiene and the Public School,” Mental Hygiene 3 (January 1919): 4–10; W. Line, “Mental Hygiene and Progressive Education,” Mental Hygiene 15 (November 1931): 744–750; Patey, Henry C. and Stevenson, George “The Mental Health Emphasis in Education,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 3 (September 1933): 464–485; Pressey, Sidney L. “Mental Hygiene: School Influences,” Review of Educational Research 6 (December 1936): 471–477. For the history of mental hygiene, see Cohen, Sol “The School and Personality Development: Intellectual History,” in Historical Inquiry in Education ed. Hardin, John Best (Washington D. C: American Educational Research Association, 1983), 109–137, on 113.Google Scholar

38 Although Cohen recognized the hybrid nature of mental hygiene, he accepted disciplinary boundaries between behaviorism and psychoanalysis. Cohen, Sol “The Mental Hygiene Movement, The Development of Personality and the School: The Medicalization of American Education,” History of Education Quarterly 23 (Summer 1983): 123–149; Grob, Gerald N. Mental Illness and American Society, 1875–1940 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983), 144–178; Kohler, Robert “Science, Foundations, and American Universities in the 1920s,” Osiris 3 (July 1987): 135–168; Richardson, The Century of the Child; Shea, “The Ideology of Mental Health.”Google Scholar

39 Psychologists distributed their interventions across practices called educational psychology, mental hygiene, clinical and school psychology, child guidance and special education. For the history of clinical and school psychology, see Baker, David B. “The Psychology of Lightner Witmer,” Professional School Psychology 3 (Winter 1988): 109–121; Fagan, Thomas K. “The Historical Origins and Growth of Programs to Prepare School Psychologists in the United States,” Journal of School Psychology 24 (January 1986): 9–22; Fagan, Thomas K. “Compulsory Schooling, Child Study, Clinical Psychology, and Special Education: The Origins of School Psychology,” American Psychologist 47 (July 1992): 224–235; French, Joseph “On the Conception, Birth, and Early Development of School Psychology,” American Psychologist 39 (September 1984): 976–987; Hersch, Charles “From Mental Health to Social Action,” American Psychologist 24 (September 1969): 909–916; Mullen, Francis A. “School Psychology in the USA: Reminiscences on its Origin,” Journal of School Psychology 19 (May 1981): 103–119; O'Donnell, John M., “The Clinical Psychology of Lightner Witmer” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 15 (Winter 1979): 3–17; Richards, Barry “Lightner Witmer and the Project of Psychotechnology,” History of the Human Sciences 1 (October 1988): 201–219; Sexton, Virginia Staudt “Antecedents of Clinical Psychology,” Genetic Psychology Monographs 72 (Winter 1965): 403–434; Wallace Wallin, J. E. and Ferguson, Donald G. “The Development of School Psychological Services,” in School Psychological Services ed. Magary, James F. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1967), 1–29; Watson, “A Brief History of Clinical Psychology;” Leila Zenderland, “Education, Evangelism, and the Origins of Clinical Psychology: The Child Study Legacy,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 24 (Spring 1988): 152–165. For the history of child guidance, see Mora, G. “Swiss and American Child Psychiatry: A View on their Development and Interrelationship” Actapaedopsychiatrica 1 (Fall 1963): 9–20; Anderson, John “Child Development in Historical Perspective,” Child Development 27 (June 1956): 181–196; Dennis, Wayne “Historical Beginnings of Child Psychology,” Psychological Bulletin 46 (September 1949): 224–235; Horn, Margo Before It's Too Late: The Child Guidance Movement in the United States, 1922–1945 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1989); Jones, Kathleen W. Taming the Troublesome Child: American Families, Child Guidance and the Limits of Psychiatric Authority (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999). For the history of special education, see Franklin, Barry From, “Backwardness” “to At-Risk“ (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994); Lazerson, Marvin “The Origins of Special Education,” in Special Education Policies eds. Chambers, Jay. G. and Hartman, William T. (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1989), 15–47; Sigmon, Radical Analysis of Special Education; Winzer, Margaret A. The History of Special Education: From Isolation to Integration (Washington, D. C: Gallaudet University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

40 Averill, Lawrence A. “The School Clinic,” American Journal of School Hygiene 1 (1917): 93–99; Doll, Edgar “Clinical Methods Applied to Teaching,” Educational Research Bulletin 8 (September 1928): 251–257; Hollingworth, Leta “Psychological Services for Public Schools,” Teachers College Record 33 (July 1933): 368–379; Hildreth, Gertrude Psychological Service for School Problems (New York: World Book Company, 1930); Louttit, Chauncy M. “The Nature of Clinical Psychology,” Psychological Bulletin 36 (1934): 361–389; Thomas, William I. and Thomas, Dorothy Swaine The Child in America (New York: Knopf, 1928), 219–294, 435–467; Wallace Wallin, J. E. “The New Clinical Psychology and the Psycho-Clinicist,” Journal of Educational Psychology 2 (April 1911): 121–132, 191–210; idem., “Clinical Psychology: What it is and What it is Not,” Science 37 (June 1913): 895–902; Lightner Witmer, “Clinical Psychology,” The Psychological Clinic 1 (March 1907): 1–9; Witty, Paul and Theman, Viola “The Psycho-Educational Clinic,” Journal of Applied Psychology 18 (July 1934): 369–392; Woods, E. L. “The School and Delinquency: Every School a Clinic,” Proceedings of the National Conference of Social Work 56 (1929): 213–221.Google Scholar

41 For medical procedures in education, see Brown, JoAnne The Definition of a Profession (Princeton: University of Princeton Press, 1992). I argue that the medicalization of education was more complex and far-reaching. Stephen Petrina, “The Medicalization of Education Revised: A Tribute to Sol Cohen,” (unpublished manuscript, 2004).Google Scholar

42 Petrina, “Sidney Pressey and the Automation;“ Welch, R. E. to Pressey, 22 November 1929, 40/49/4/25, Pressey Papers, OSU Archives; Pressey to Gilchriese, 5 June 1930, 40/49/4/26, Pressey Papers, OSU Archives; Pressey, Sidney L. “Sidney Leavitt Pressey,” in A History of Psychology in Autobiography eds. Boring, E. G. and Lindsay, Gardner (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967), 313–339, on 323.Google Scholar

43 “College of Education,” in The Ohio State University Catalog, 1930–1931 (Columbus: OSU, 1930), 95–99, 199–208; Arps, George F. “Report of the College of Education for the year ending June 30, 1930” in 60th Annual Report of The Board of Trustees of The Ohio State University For the Year Ending June 30, 1930 (Columbus: OSU, 1930), 154; Wherry, A Statistical History, 9–10.Google Scholar

44 Arps, “Report of the College,” 1930, 149–150.Google Scholar

45 Arps, to Rightmire, 10 January 1930, 3/f/40/10, Rightmire, George Papers, OSU Archives; Rightmire to Pressey, 15 January 1930, 3/f/40/10, Rightmire Papers, OSU Archives.Google Scholar

46 Arps, “Report of the College,” 1930, 149–159; “Memorandum in “The Load of the Department of Psychology,” 10 April 1930, 1–6, 3/f/40/10, Rightmire Papers, OSU Archives; Leatherman Stogdill to Goddard, 20 March 1930; “Analysis of Teaching Loads,” [28 December 1933], 3/f/40/11; Arps, “Report of the College,” 1929, 96. There were 22 people on the payroll in Cole's and Pressey's first year (i.e., fall 1921-spring 1922). Arps, “Report of the College,” 1922, 224–225; Arps, “Report of the College,” 1926, 168; Arps, “Report of the College,” 1930, 315.Google Scholar

47 Harper, Robert “Tables of American Doctorates in Psychology,” American Journal of Psychology 62 (1949): 579–587, on 582–583; According to Wherry's tally, OSU's rise to the top came a year earlier. Wherry, A Statistical History, 10. See also Charles, Don “Early Research in Educational Psychology,” Educational Psychologist 23 (March 1988): 221–223.Google Scholar

48 Arps, Pressey to 30 December 1931, 40/49/2/5, Pressey Papers, OSU Archives.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49 Wilce to Pressey, L. C. 17 March 1932, 3/f/40/10, Rightmire Papers, OSU Archives. For sanitarium note, see Pressey to Arps, 9 July 1931, 3/f/40/10, Rightmire Papers, OSU Archives; For Winnetka note, see [Sidney Pressey, L., “Pressey,” 1975 1 March 40/49/2/20, Pressey Papers, OSU Archives; Pressey, L. C. to Arps, 17 March 1932, 3/f/40/11, Rightmire Papers, OSU Archives; Pressey to Arps, 4 August 1931, 3/f/40/10, Rightmire Papers, OSU Archives; Pressey, L. C. to Arps, 17 March 1932, 3/f/40/11, Rightmire Papers, OSU Archives; Arps to Rightmire, 18 March 1932, 3/f/40/11, Rightmire Papers, OSU Archives.Google Scholar

50 Pressey, Luella C. “Luella Cole Pressey,” The Speedometer (March 1931): 20. Cole was ambivalent about the issue of female scientists and marriage, noting matter-of-factly that “scientific women do not tend to marry.” She reported that 10 percent of the 687 women in the “American Men of Science” were married when she was inducted in 1928. About half of these females were married to male scientists, but it is not clear how many of the 122 female psychologists were married to male psychologists. In a survey of psychologists in 1946, 72 percent of men saw marriage as definitely a professional asset whereas only 28 percent of women saw marriage as a professional asset. For nearly 34 percent of the women marriage was a “hindrance or even a cause of abandoning a career in psychology.” Pressey, Luella Cole “The Women Whose Names Appear in ‘American Men of Science’ For 1927,” School and Society 29 (1929): 96–100; Bryan, Alice I. and Boring, Edwin G. “Women in American Psychology: Factors Affecting Their Professional Careers,” American Psychologist 2 (January 1947): 3–20, on 15. For academic couples in history, see Abir-Am, Pnina and Outram, Dorinda eds., Uneasy Careers and Intimate Lives (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1995); Ferber, Marianne and Loeb, Jane W. eds., Academic Couples: Problems and Promises (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997); Slack, Nancy Pycior, Helena M. and Abir-Am, Pnina Creative Couples in the Sciences (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1995); Rossiter, Women Scientists in America, 135–145. For women at OSU, see Crissey, Marie Skodak “School Psychology: Reminiscences of Earlier Times,” Journal of School Psychology 21 (July 1983): 163–177.Google Scholar

51 Pressey's suspicions, articulated in his diary in 1975, were confirmed given the love letters found in the Lowie Papers. [Pressey, Sidney L., “Pressey,” 1 March 1975, 40/49/2/20, Pressey Papers, OSU Archives; Risa, Lowie to 15 July 1930, C-B 927/2, Robert, H. Lowie Papers, The Bancroft Library, Special Collections, University of California, Berkeley, California; Lowie to Cole, “Dear Dollink,” 20 March 1933, C-B 927/15:8, Lowie Papers; Cole, Luella W. “Luella Cole,” The Speedometer, of the Class of 1916 of Vassar College (April 1934): 16 (Vassar College Libraries, Special Collections); “Cole, Luella, W. “ Vassar College Alumnae Biographical Register (New York: Vassar College, 1939), 217.Google Scholar

52 [Pressey, S. L., L., “Summary: S. and Pressey, L. C. “ [ca. 1929–1930], Yerkes Papers, Yale University Library, Manuscripts and Archives; [Pressey, S. L., “Pressey: Career Resume as of February 17, 1972,” Biographical File, Pressey Papers, OSU Archives; [L., S. and Pressey, L. C., “Published Tests by Pressey, Sidney L. and Pressey, Luella C. “ [ca., 1929–1930], Charters, W. W. Papers, The Ohio State University Library, Special Books and Manuscripts.Google Scholar

53 Willing, Matthew H. “The Encouragement of Individual Instruction by Means of Individualized Tests,” Journal of Educational Research 1 (1920): 193–198, on 195; Cole, Luella Psychology of the Elementary School Subjects (New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1934), 312; Averill, Lawrence A. The Hygiene of Instruction (Boston: Riverside, 1928), 273.Google Scholar

54 Gates, Arthur “Recent Advances in Educational Psychology,” School and Society 24 91929): 1–8; Good, Carter “Research in Secondary School Methods,” Journal of Educational Research 22 (September 1930): 9–30; Pennell, Mary “Growth in Technique of Class-Room Methods,” Teachers College Record 24 (Winter 1923): 213–221.Google Scholar

55 As education historians have overlooked nuances of psychology in education and the interdependencies between behaviorism and psychoanalysis, historians of psychoanalysis have also painted their topic with very general strokes. For the history of psychoanalysis in education, see Eckstein, Rudolf and Motto, Rocco “Psychoanalysis and Education—an Historical Account,” in From Learning for Love to Love of Learning eds. Eckstein, Rudolf and Motto, Rocco (New York: Brunner/Mazel Publishers, 1969), 3–27; Cohen, Sol “In the Name of the Prevention of Neurosis: The Search for a Psychoanalytic Pedagogy in Europe, 1905–1938,” in Regulated Children, Liberated Children: Education in Psychohistorical Perspective ed. Finkelstein, Barbara (New York: Psychohistory Press, 1979), 184–219; Freud, Anna “A Short History of Child Analysis,” Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 21 (January 1966): 7–14; Suppes, Patrick and Warren, Henry “Psychoanalysis and American Elementary Education,” in Impact of Research on Education ed. Suppes, Patrick (Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Education, 1978), 319–396. For psychoanalysis and behaviorism, see Burnham, John C. “The New Psychology: From Narcissism to Social Control,” in Change and Continuity in Twentieth Century America: The 1920s eds. Braeman, John Bremnert, Robert H. and Brody, David (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1968), 351–398; Hornstein, Gail “The Return of the Repressed: Psychology's Problematic Relations with Psychoanalysis, 1909–1960,” American Psychologist 47 (April 1992): 254–263; Jastrow, Joseph The House That Freud Built (New York: Greenburg, 1932); Leys, Ruth “Meyer, Watson, and the Dangers of Behaviorism,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 20 (Winter 1984): 128–149; Stendler, Celia B. “New Ideas for Old: How Freudism was Received in the United States from 1900–1925,” Journal of Educational Psychology 38 (April 1947): 193–206.Google Scholar

56 For education and psychoanalysis, see Adler, Alfred “Individual Psychology,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 22 (March 1927): 116–122; Brill, A. A. “The Introduction and Development of Freud's Work in the United States,” American Journal of Sociology 45 (November 1939): 318–425; Coriat, Isador “The Psychoanalytic Approach to Education,” Progressive Education 3 (January 1926): 19–26; Evans, Elida The Problem of the Nervous Child (New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1920); Freud, Anna Psychoanalysis for Teachers and Parents, Low, Barbara trans. (New York: Beacon Press, 1935); Green, George H. Psychoanalysis in the Classroom (New York: Putnam, 1921); Healy, William “Psychoanalytic Contributions to the Understanding and Treatment of Behavior Problems,” American Journal of Sociology (November 1939): 318–325; Humphrey, George “Education and Freudianism,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 15 (Fall 1920): 350–402; Jones, Ernest “Psycho-Analysis and Education,” Journal of Educational Psychology 1 (September 1910): 497–520; Klein, Melanie The Psychoanalysis of Children, Strachey, Alex trans. (New York: W. W. Norton 1932); Lay, Wilfred The Child's Unconscious Mind: The Relations of Psychoanalysis to Education (New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1919); Miller, H. Crichton “Psychoanalysis and the School,” Mental Hygiene 7 (January 1923): 32–42; Payne, Charles R. “Some Contributions of Psychoanalysis to the Problems of Education,” State Hospital Bulletin 7 (September 1914): 281–285; Pfister, Oskar Psychoanalysis in the Service of Education (London: Klimpton Henry Rivlin 1922); Henry Educating for Adjustment (New York: Appleton-Century, 1936); Schmalhausen, Samuel D. Humanizing Education (New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1927); Watts, Frank Education for Self-Realisation and Social Service (London: University of London Press, 1920); idem., Abnormal Psychology and Education (New York: Appleton, D. and Company, 1924); Wittels, Frank “Psychoanalysis for Teachers,” Progressive Education 8 (Fall 1931): 238–241; Jastrow, Joseph “Psychology,” Saturday Review of Literature, 2 3 September 1933, 137.Google Scholar

57 Blair, Glen “The Content of Educational Psychology,” Journal of Educational Psychology 30 (July 1949): 267–274; Symonds, Percival “A New Meaning for Educational Psychology,” Journal of Educational Psychology 30 (January 1939): 33–37, on 36–37; Rice, Philip B. “Symposium: The Ego and the Law of Effect,” Psychological Review 53 (April 1946): 307–320; Tow, W. Clark and Blair, Glenn “Organization of Content,” in Educational Psychology in Teacher Education eds. Cook, Walter and Trow, W. Clark (Ann Arbor: National Society of College Teachers of Education, 1953), 27–46.Google Scholar

58 Zachry, Caroline B. “The Influence of Psychoanalysis in Education,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 10 (July 1941): 431–444, on 434–435; Burnham, The Normal Mind, 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59 For the individualization of the masses, see Petrina, “Sidney Pressey and the Automation,” 327–330. Watson, John B. “Behavior and the Concept of Mental Disease,” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Method 13 (October 1916): 589–596; idem., “Does Holt Follow Freud?,” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Method 14 (January 1917): 85–93; Pressey, Psychology and the New Education, 6. On the individualism of social psychology, see Greenwood, John D. “Individualism and the Social in Early American Social Psychology,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 36 (Fall 2000): 443–455. For radical progressive education, see Bowers, Chet A. Progressive Education and the Depression: The Radical Years (New York: Random House, 1969); Pells, Richard H. Radical Visions and American Dreams: Culture and Social Thought in the Depression Years (New York: Harper & Row, 1973). For Marx and psychology, see Fromm, Erich “On the Method and Function of an Analytical Social Psychology,” in The Crisis of Psychoanalysis, Fromm, Erich (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1970/1932), 110–134; Lichtman, Richard The Production of Desire: The Integration of Psychoanalysis into Marxist Theory (New York: Free Press, 1982); McLaughlin, Neil “Origin Myths in the Social Sciences: Fromm, the Frankfurt School and the Emergence of Critical Theory,” Canadian Journal of Sociology 24 (1999): 109–139; Roiser, Martin and Willig, Carol “Marxism, the Frankfort School and Working-Class Psychology,” in Psychology and Society eds. Parker, Ian and Spears, Russell (Chicago: Pluto Press, 1996), 50–63; Spears, Russell and Parker, Ian “Marxist Themes and Psychological Themes,” in Psychology and Society eds. Parker, Ian and Spears, Russell (Chicago: Pluto Press, 1996), 1–17.Google Scholar

60 See n. 3 above for the history of educational psychology. For identity crises in educational psychology, see Ausubel, David “Is There a Discipline of Educational Psychology?,” Educational Psychologist 5 (January 1968): 1, 4, 9; Ball, Samuel “Educational Psychology as an Academic Chameleon,” Journal of Educational Psychology 76 (November 1984): 993–999; Bardon, Jack “Psychology Applied to Education: A Specialty in Search of an Identity,” American Psychologist 38 (February 1983): 185–196; Berliner, “The 100 Year Journey;” Blair, Glenn “The Content of Educational Psychology,” Journal of Educational Psychology 40 (March 1949): 267–274; Houtz, John and Lewis, Carol “The Professional Practice of Educational Psychology,” Educational Psychology Review 6 (March 1994): 1–23; Pintrich, Paul “Continuities and Discontinuities: Future Directions for Research in Educational Psychology,” Educational Psychologist (Fall 1994): 137–148; Snowman, Jack “Educational Psychology: What do We Teach?,” Educational Psychology Review 9 (July 1997): 151–171, on 151.Google Scholar

61 Kochs, S. C. “We've Gone Psychiatric,” The Survey 64 (April 1930): 188–190, on 190; Freud, Sigmund “The Question of Lay Analysis,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XX eds. Strachey, James and Freud, Anna (London: the Hogarth Press, 1959), 183–250, on 250; Thorndike, Edward L. “Intelligence and its Uses” Harpers Magazine, January, 1920, 227–235, on 235; On the subjugation of psychoanalysis, see Hornstein, “The Return of the Repressed;” Leys, “Meyer, Watson, and the Dangers of Behaviorism.” Leys mistakenly generalized differences between Meyer and Watson to be latent oppositions between behaviorism and psychoanalysis; Mills, John A. Control: A History of Behavioral Psychology (New York: New York University Press, 1998), 162; O'Donnell, The Origins of Behaviorism, 234–237. O'Donnell, dispenses with psychoanalysis much too easily to complete his argument for the triumph of behaviorism. Ignoring the fact that his history ends at 1920 or so, he relied on published sources of those psychologists who spoke out against Freud and psychoanalysis. Cases for behaviorism's repudiation of psychoanalysis are much too general to hold up to detailed scrutiny of practices in child guidance, clinical and educational psychology and mental hygiene. Historians are coddling the psychologists here, serving up a myth that American psychologists were wont to promote: American psychology was a hard experimental and scientific practice; American psychologists were a tough-minded breed and eschewed that which smacked of anything “mystical” or “unverifiable”—behaviorism, upon rescuing psychology and triumphing over the Europeans, was nothing if not ruggedly American.Google Scholar