No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
At the moment of its founding in 1911, Connecticut College for Women exhibited a curricular tension between an emphasis on the liberal arts, which mirrored the elite men's and women's colleges of the day, and vocational aspects, which made it a different type of women's college, one designed to prepare women for the kind of lives they would lead in twentieth-century America. Connecticut was a women's college that simultaneously embraced the established brand of education practiced by its prestigious Seven Sister neighbors and forged its own path by integrating elements of home economics, municipal housekeeping, and professional/clerical training into its academic program. For forty years Connecticut College for Women achieved a balance between those two opposing poles of its curriculum.
1 Harris, William Welton, “Some Personal Reminiscences of Sykes, Dr.,” Connecticut College Archives (hereafter identified as CCA). See also The Connecticut College for Women (New London, CT: Connecticut College, 1911), 11. The Seven Sisters were Barnard College, Bryn Mawr College, Mount Holyoke College, Radcliffe College, Smith College, Vassar College, and Wellesley College.Google Scholar
2 Connecticut College for Women First Annual Announcement, 1915–1916 (New London, CT: Connecticut College for Women, 1915), 6–9.Google Scholar
3 “President Harry Truman's Commission Calls for Expansion of Higher Education,” in President's Commission on Higher Education, Higher Education for American Democracy: A Report; of The President's Commission on Higher Education (New York, Harper & Brothers, 1947–48), 1, 25–29, 32–39.Google Scholar
4 Eastburn, Warrine, “Miss Katharine Blunt, Biographical Material,” CCA, Katharine Blunt File.Google Scholar
5 Rosenberg, Rosalind, “The Limits of Access: The History of Coeducation in America,” in Women and Higher Education in American History, ed. Faragher, John Mack and Howe, Florence (New York: Norton, W.W., 1988), 125.Google Scholar
6 Stage, Sarah and Vincenti, Virginia B., eds., Rethinking Home Economics: Women and the History of a Profession (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997), 77.Google Scholar
7 Stage, , “Home Economics: What's in a Name?” in Rethinking Home Economics: Women and the History of a Profession, 8.Google Scholar
8 Stricker, Frank, “Cookbooks and Law Books: The Hidden History of Career Women in Twentieth-Century America,” in A Heritage of Her Own: Toward a New Social History of American Women, eds. Cott, Nancy F. and Pleck, Elizabeth Hofkin (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1979), 476–495, 490.Google Scholar
9 Lee, Dorothy D., “What Shall We Teach Women?” Mademoiselle (August 1947): 213,354,356,358. History of Education Quarterly Google Scholar
10 Sullivan, Patricia, “Rosemary Park: A Study of Educational Leadership during the Revolutionary Decades,” (PhD dissertation, Boston College, 1982), 35.Google Scholar
11 34th Annual Catalogue of Connecticut College (New London, CT: Connecticut College for Women, March 1948).Google Scholar
12 Ibid. See also Connecticut College for Women: First Annual Announcement, 1915–1916, 17; Sullivan, “Rosemary Park,” 38.Google Scholar
13 Sullivan, “Rosemary Park,” 38.Google Scholar
14 Noyes, History of Connecticut College, 143. See also Luce, Chuck, “Living Legends: Rosemary Park Anastos,” Connecticut College Magazine (Spring 1998): 32–33.Google Scholar
15 Ibid. See also Shafrter, Dorothy File, CCA.Google Scholar
16 Johnson, Alice, unpublished manuscript, (1997), 42. CCA, Alice Johnson File.Google Scholar
17 Park served as Connecticut's acting president in 1946–1947. Her official inauguration took place on 17 May 1947. Noyes, History of Connecticut College. See also Sullivan, “Rosemary Park.” See also “Dr. Rosemary Park Excited Over 50th Anniversary of Connecticut College,” New Haven Register, 15 January 1961; Frances Green, “Charming Scholar, Efficient Administrator Is Rosemary Park,” Worcester Sunday Telegram, 20 May 1962.Google Scholar
18 Noyes, History of Connecticut College. Google Scholar
19 Ibid.Google Scholar
20 Luce, “Living Legends.” See also “Eastburn, “Miss Katharine Blunt,” Biographical Material,” 7; “Connecticut College's Strategic Priorities for the Second Century: Draft 8,” 2 February 2007, 40–46, which lists the opening date of each campus building.Google Scholar
21 Sullivan, “Rosemary Park,” 28.Google Scholar
22 Ibid.Google Scholar
23 Ibid.Google Scholar
24 Ibid., 28, 36.Google Scholar
25 Ibid., 36.Google Scholar
26 Park, while considered one of Connecticut's most effective presidents, had less success and a shorter reign as Barnard College's president in the tumultuous later 1960s; see Sullivan, “Rosemary Park.”Google Scholar
27 Ibid., 36.Google Scholar
28 Park, Rosemary, “Remarks to Assembly, April 27, 1961,” in Fiftieth Anniversary Celebration Publication: Connecticut College 1911–1961 (New London, CT: Connecticut College, 1961), 26.Google Scholar
29 Goodwin, Richard, interview by author 24 April 2007 (interview in possession of author). Goodwin joined the Connecticut College faculty in 1944, retired in 1976, but remained closely associated with the College until his death in July 2007.Google Scholar
30 Johnson, , unpublished manuscript, 44.Google Scholar
31 The Instruction Committee is cited as the decision-making body in Rosemary Park's, 14 November 1952 letter to Margaret S. Chaney. CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
32 Park, Rosemary, President's Report, 1952 (New London, CT: Connecticut College for Women, 1952), 5.Google Scholar
33 Ibid. There is no indication that students had an influential role in the curriculum discussions, which given that they occurred in the 1950s, is not surprising.Google Scholar
34 Ibid., 8.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., 9.Google Scholar
36 Park, Rosemary, Report of the President, 1946–1962 (New London, CT: Connecticut College, 1962), 17.Google Scholar
37 Connecticut College for Women, First Annual Announcement, 1915–1916 (New London, CT: Connecticut College for Women, 1915), 17, 32.Google Scholar
38 Ibid.Google Scholar
39 Ibid.Google Scholar
40 Ibid.Google Scholar
41 Connecticut College Bulletin, 1939–1940 (New London, CT: Connecticut College for Women, 30 March 1939). See also Connecticut College Bulletin, 1925–1926 (New London, CT: Connecticut College for Women, 30 March 1925); 34th Annual Catalogue of Connecticut College. Google Scholar
42 Chaney, Margaret to Blunt, Katharine, 24 October 1940, CCA, Home Economics File, 1940 enrollment figure from Irene Nye, Chapters in the History of Connecticut College during the First Three Administrations, 1911–1942 (New London, CT: Connecticut College, 1943), 76.Google Scholar
43 Eastburn, , “Miss Katharine Blunt, Biographical Material,” 3–4.Google Scholar
44 Sykes, Frederick H., “The Social Basis of the New Education for Women,” Teachers College Record (May 1917): 227. See also “Eastburn, “Miss Katharine Blunt,” Biographical Material,” 3.Google Scholar
45 Ibid.Google Scholar
46 Deutsch, Sarah Jane, “From Ballots to Breadlines,” in No Small Courage: A History of Women in the United States, ed. Cott, Nancy F. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 413–72, 41.Google Scholar
47 Oral recollections of Miss Elizabeth C. Wright to Anne Taylor, 1957–58, CCA, Elizabeth Wright File.Google Scholar
48 Eastburn, , “Miss Katharine Blunt, Biographical Material,” 7.Google Scholar
49 Blunt, Katharine, “Unique Characteristics of Connecticut College,” 10 May 1941, CCA, Katharine Blunt File.Google Scholar
50 Ibid.Google Scholar
51 Eastburn, , “Miss Katharine Blunt, Biographical Material,” 5.Google Scholar
52 Eisenmann, Linda, Higher Education for Women in Postwar America, 1945–1965 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006), 6.Google Scholar
53 Ibid.Google Scholar
54 Ibid.Google Scholar
55 Ibid.Google Scholar
56 Ibid. There are suggestions in Katharine Blunt's papers, as well as in the home economics files in the CCA, that Blunt was less than enthusiastic about a marriage course being part of the curriculum at a serious liberal arts college. See also Home Economics File, CCA.Google Scholar
57 Blunt, Katharine to Noyes, Dr. Albert, Jr., 18 December 1939. Blunt's letter to Noyes, Dr., the chair of the Chemistry Department at the University of Rochester, emphasizes that Connecticut College's home economics courses in foods and nutrition required laboratory work and had as prerequisites courses in organic and physiological chemistry. Blunt also refers to Chaney and Ahlborn's co-authored book, Nutrition, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
58 Eastburn, , “Miss Katharine Blunt, Biographical Material,” 3–7.Google Scholar
59 Ibid. See also Tomes, Nancy, “Spreading the Germ Theory: Sanitary Science and Home Economics, 1880–1930,” in Stage and Vincenti, Rethinking Home Economics, 34–54, 43.Google Scholar
60 Ibid.Google Scholar
61 K.M., “Miss Blunt Cited as Distinguished Citizen,” Connecticut College Alumnae Magazine (May 1949): 6–9.Google Scholar
62 Chaney, Margaret S. to Faculty Instruction Committee, 1 January 1946, CCA, Home Economics File. In objecting to the Ph.D. requirement for faculty, Chaney was not making a self-serving argument, for she held a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
63 Ibid.Google Scholar
64 Ibid.Google Scholar
65 Ibid.Google Scholar
66 Ibid.Google Scholar
67 Secretary of the faculty instruction committee to Margaret S. Chaney, 9 January 1946, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
68 Chaney, Margaret S. to President Park, 1 March 1948, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
69 Ibid.Google Scholar
70 Ibid.Google Scholar
71 Park, Rosemary to Chaney, Margaret S., 2 March 1948, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
72 Chaney, Margaret S. to Rosemary Park, 29 January 1953, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
73 Ibid.Google Scholar
74 Ibid.Google Scholar
75 Ibid.Google Scholar
76 Ibid.Google Scholar
77 Ibid. A handwritten note on the first page of Chaney's letter states that, “R.P. spoke to Miss Chaney.”Google Scholar
78 Bulletin of Connecticut College, 1957–1958 (New London, CT: Connecticut College, 15 April 1958).Google Scholar
79 Connecticut College Bulletin 1950 (New London, CT: Connecticut College for Women, 1950).Google Scholar
80 Ibid.Google Scholar
81 Connecticut College Bulletin, 1959 (New London, CT: Connecticut College, 1959).Google Scholar
82 Ibid.Google Scholar
83 Ibid.Google Scholar
84 Ibid.Google Scholar
85 Bulletin of Connecticut College 1961 (New London, CT: Connecticut College, 15 April 1961).Google Scholar
86 Bulletin of Connecticut College, 1957–1958. Google Scholar
87 Park, , President's Report, 1952, 10.Google Scholar
88 Sullivan, , “Rosemary Park,” 39. Park does not mention the vocational courses of study in her 1952 and 1962 president's reports, the only two of those reports to raise the issue of curricular reform. But on page 14 of the 1962 president's report Park asserts that the child development major was not as attractive to current students as it had been to previous generations. Gertrude Noyes also curiously deemphasizes this aspect of curricular reform, choosing instead to give more ink in her 1982 history of the College to the shift in 1961–1962 from five courses per semester to four.Google Scholar
89 Connecticut College Bulletin, 1959. Google Scholar
90 Eastburn, , “Miss Katharine Blunt, Biographical Material.” Also Jeanette Hersey, interview by author 22 January 2007 (interview in possession of author); Bulletin of Connecticut College: Announcements for 1953–1954 (New London, CT: Connecticut College, 30 March 1953), 142.Google Scholar
91 Bulletin of Connecticut College 1961. See also “Faculty Discussion Reveals Changes of New Curriculum,” Connecticut College News (18 February 1953): 2.Google Scholar
92 Connecticut College Bulletin, 1959. Google Scholar
93 Bulletin of Connecticut College 1961, 131.Google Scholar
94 CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
95 Chaney, Margaret S. to Home Economics Alumnae, 14 January 1957, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
96 Ibid.Google Scholar
97 Chapman, Dorothy Cole ‘44 to Rosemary Park, 19 January 1957, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
98 Ibid.Google Scholar
99 Pattison, Virginia Martin ‘42 to Rosemary Park, 18 January 1957. See also Virginia Taber McCamey to Rosemary Park, 27 January 1957, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
100 Rosik, Cynthia to Park, Rosemary, 26 January 1957, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
101 Bartlett, Dorothea to Park, Rosemary, 23 January 1957, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
102 Mrs. Earle Stamm, W. to Park, Rosemary, 29 January 1953, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
103 Bartlett, to Park, Rosemary.Google Scholar
104 Gosling, Marjorie J. ‘50 to Rosemary Park, 25 January 1957, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
105 Stage, , “Home Economics: What's in a Name?” in Stage and Vincenti, Rethinking Home Economics, 11.Google Scholar
106 Babbitt, Kathleen, “Legitimizing Nutrition Education: The Impact of the Great Depression,” in Stage and Vincenti, Rethinking Home Economics, 145.Google Scholar
107 Carter, Jean Kohlberger ‘43 to Rosemary Park, 22 January 1957, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
108 Gosling ‘50 to Rosemary Park.Google Scholar
109 Draper, Judith to Park, Rosemary, 16 October 1958, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
110 Carman Palmer von Bremen to Park, Rosemary, 29 September 1953, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
111 Park, Rosemary to Martin, Virginia Pattison ‘42, 30 January 1957, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
112 Park, Rosemary to Draper, Mrs. Daniel, 28 October 1958, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
113 Park, Rosemary to Carter, Mrs. Elwood, Jr. (Jean Kohlberger Carter), 25 January 1957, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
114 Park, Rosemary to Chaney, Margaret S., 19 March 1957, CCA, Home Economics File.Google Scholar
115 Noyes, , History of Connecticut College, 148. See also “Faculty Discussion Reveals Changes of New Curriculum,” 1–2.Google Scholar
116 Park, , President's Report, 1952, 6–7.Google Scholar
117 Park, , “Remarks to Assembly, April 27, 1961,” 26.Google Scholar
118 Noyes, , History of Connecticut College, 148.Google Scholar
119 Sullivan, , “Rosemary Park,” 38.Google Scholar
120 Park, , Report of the President, 1946–1962, 13–15.Google Scholar
121 Ibid.Google Scholar
122 Noyes, , History of Connecticut College, 148. See also Park, , “Remarks to Assembly, 27 April 1961,” 25.Google Scholar
123 Ibid.Google Scholar
124 Park, , “Remarks to Assembly, April 27, 1961,” 25.Google Scholar
125 Noyes, , History of Connecticut College, 148.Google Scholar
126 Ibid, 148.Google Scholar
127 Park, , Report of the President, 1946–1962, 13.Google Scholar
128 Ibid.Google Scholar
129 Johnson, , unpublished manuscript, 69.Google Scholar
131 Noyes, , History of Connecticut College, 148.Google Scholar
132 Ibid.Google Scholar
133 Ibid, 149.Google Scholar
134 Johnson, , unpublished manuscript, 69.Google Scholar
135 Ibid.Google Scholar
136 Ibid.Google Scholar
137 Ibid.Google Scholar
138 Ibid.Google Scholar
139 Park, , “Remarks to Assembly, 27 April 1961,” 26.Google Scholar
140 Frankfort, , Domesticity and Career in Turn-of-the-Century America, 105.Google Scholar
141 Stage, & Vincenti, , Rethinking Home Economics, 15.Google Scholar
142 Stage, and Vincenti, , “Women's Place: Home Economics and Education,” in Rethinking Home Economics, 71.Google Scholar
143 Ibid., 77.Google Scholar
144 Rosenburg, Rosalind, Divided Lives: American Women in the Twentieth Century (New York: Hill and Wang, 1992), 100. See also Sicherman, Barbara, “College and Careers: Historical Perspectives on the Lives and Work Patterns of Women College Graduates,” in Women and Higher Education in American History, ed. Faragher, John Mack and Howe, Florence (New York: Norton, W.W., 1988), 130–164, 155.Google Scholar
145 Ibid.Google Scholar
146 Plum, Dorothy A. and Dowell, George B., The Magnificent Enterprise: A Chronicle of Vassar College (Poughkeepsie, NY: Vassar College, 1961), 63.Google Scholar
147 Stage, Saran, “Ellen Richards and the Social Significance of the Home Economics Movement,” in Rethinking Home Economics: Women and the History of a Profession, 17–33, 27.Google Scholar
148 Ibid., 27.Google Scholar
149 Ibid., 23Google Scholar
150 Plum, and Dowell, , The Magnificent Enterprise, 63.Google Scholar
151 Deutsch, , “From Ballots to Breadlines,” 413–472, 441.Google Scholar
152 Plum, and Dowell, , The Magnificent Enterprise, 63.Google Scholar
153 Ibid., 67.Google Scholar
154 Sicherman, , “College and Careers,” 154.Google Scholar
155 Stage, , “Home Economics: What's in a Name?” 8.Google Scholar
156 Ibid., 7. See also Stage, “Ellen Richards and the Social Significance of the Home Economics Movement,” 25.Google Scholar
157 Stage, , “Home Economics: What's in a Name?” 8.Google Scholar
158 Ibid.Google Scholar
159 Rossiter, Margaret, Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940 (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
160 Eisenmann, Linda, “Educating the Female Citizen in a Post-War World: Competing Ideologies for American Women, 1945–1965,” Educational Review 54, no. 2 (2002): 133–141. See also Eisenmann, Higher Education for Women in Postwar America, 4.Google Scholar
161 Sullivan, , “Rosemary Park,” 32.Google Scholar
162 Ibid.Google Scholar
163 Park, Rosemary, President's Report, 1957 (New London, CT: Connecticut College for Women, 1957), 7.Google Scholar
164 Ibid.Google Scholar
165 Vincenti, Virginia, “Chronology,” in Rethinking Home Economics: Women and the History of a Profession, 321–330, 326.Google Scholar
166 Astin, , “Interview with Rosemary Park,” xxii.Google Scholar
167 Ibid.Google Scholar
168 Ibid.Google Scholar
169 Doro, Marion and Willauer, George interviews.Google Scholar
170 McCandless, Amy Thompson, The Past in the Present: Women's Higher Education in the Twentieth-Century American South (Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 1999), 6. See also Finishing schools bestowed the right social cache and provided training in social deportment, but were usually not four-year colleges, according to Joyce Antler's, “The Educational Biography of Lucy Sprague Mitchell: A Case Study in the History of Women's Higher Education,” in Women and Higher Education in American History, ed. John Mack Faragher and Florence Howe (New York: W.W. Norton, 1988), 43–63, 47.Google Scholar
171 Ibid.Google Scholar
172 Horowitz, Helen, 28 April 2007 and McPherson, Mary Pat, 1 November 2007, interviews by author (interviews in possession of author).Google Scholar
173 Goodwin, Claire and Wood, Jason, “A Brief History of Simmons College.” Accessed 12 February 2007 from http://www.simmons.edu/resources/libraries/archives/briefhistory_text.htm. See also Poulson, “Simmons College: Meeting the Needs of Women Workers,” 208–234.Google Scholar
174 Ibid.Google Scholar
175 Ibid.Google Scholar
176 Schmidt, , Douglass College: A History. Google Scholar
177 Miller-Bernal, , Separate by Degree, 88.Google Scholar
178 Lynn, , Make No Small Plans, 91.Google Scholar
179 Ibid., 91.Google Scholar
180 Ibid.Google Scholar
181 Johnson, , unpublished manuscript, 29.Google Scholar
182 Johnson, Alice, “Everything Changes, Nothing Changes,” Connecticut College Alumni Magazine (Winter 1978): 21–22, 34.Google Scholar
183 Jonnson, , unpublished manuscript, 29.Google Scholar
184 Ibid., 29.Google Scholar
185 Ibid., 31–32.Google Scholar
186 Ibid., 30.Google Scholar
187 Johnson, , “Everything Changes, Nothing Changes,” 21–22, 34.Google Scholar
188 Ibid.Google Scholar
189 Ibid.Google Scholar
190 Ibid.Google Scholar
191 Johnson, unpublished manuscript, 31.Google Scholar
192 Ibid.Google Scholar
193 Ibid., 46.Google Scholar
194 Ibid.Google Scholar
195 Ibid., 31. Johnson, defended the strength of the physical education major, citing that its demanding science requirements had prepared not a small number of its graduates for medical school.Google Scholar
196 Ibid., 31.Google Scholar
197 Bredeson, , Fenton, T., Hersey, , and Kaplan, interviews. Also Claire Gaudiani, 5 June 2007, Lynda Munro, 29 August 2007, Charlie Luce, 21 April 2007, Brian Rogers, 5 December 2006 and 22 January 2007, interviews by author (interviews in possession of author).Google Scholar
198 Egbert, A. Case to Wright, Elizabeth C., 5 June 1911, CCA, Elizabeth Wright File. Case had asked, “Will it [the new college] be of the nature of Simmons or of Smith?”Google Scholar
199 Sykes, , “The Social Basis of the New Education for Women,” 227.Google Scholar
200 Eastburn, , “Miss Katharine Blunt, Biographical Material,” 3.Google Scholar
201 Ibid., 5, 7. Oakes Ames paraphrases Blunt's view of Connecticut College's “central interest” in The Annual Report of the President 1984/85 (New London, CT: Connecticut College, 1985), 1.Google Scholar
202 A question articulated by Linda Eisenmann in “Educating the Female Citizen in a Post-War World,” 140.Google Scholar
203 Luce, , “Living Legends.” See also Park, “Your College Education: Our Mutual Responsibility,” 15. At that talk in September 1957, Park said, “life is not just making a living. It is also living a life.”Google Scholar
204 Park, Rosemary, “Charge to the Seniors: Commencement, 11 June 1961,” in Fiftieth Anniversary Celebration Publication: Connecticut College 1911–1961 (New London, CT: Connecticut College, 1961), 28. See also Sullivan, “Rosemary Park,” 28.Google Scholar