¹ Cf. Lumen Gentium 13, 50; Gaudium et spes 12, 32; Unitatis redintegratio 2, 15, in Vatican Council II, Volume One: The Conciliar and Post-Conciliar Documents, ed. and trans. Flannery, Austin, rev. ed. (New York: Costello, 1998).Google Scholar Biblical uses of the term include the common greeting of St. Paul's letters (e.g., 1 Cor 1:9). Other instances include 1 John 1:3–7; 2 Cor 13:13; Acts 2:42.

² E.g., Balthasar, Hans Urs von, Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory vols. 1–5, trans. Harrison, Graham (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1980–1998)Google Scholar; Gelpi, Donald, The Divine Mother: A Trinitarian Theology of the Holy Spirit (New York: University Press of America, 1984).Google Scholar

³ Doyle, Dennis M., Communion Ecclesiology: Vision and Versions (New York: Orbis, 2000), 19–20.Google Scholar

⁴ Hunt, Anne, “Psychological Analogy and Paschal Mystery in Trinitarian Theology,” Theological Studies 59 (1998): 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ Leftow, Brian, “Anti-Social Trinitarianism,” in The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trinity, ed. Davis, Stephen, Kendall, David, O'Collins, Gerald (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 203–49.Google Scholar

⁶ LaCugna, Catherine Mowry, “The Trinitarian Mystery of God,” in Systematic Theology: Roman Catholic Perspectives, vol. 1 (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991), 170.Google Scholar

⁷ Ibid., 171.

⁸ LaCugna, Catherine Mowry, God For Us: The Trinity and Christian Life (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1991), 152–54.Google Scholar

⁹ O'Collins, Gerald, The Tripersonal God (New York: Paulist, 1999), 131–2.Google Scholar

¹⁰ LaCugna, , God For Us, 60.Google Scholar

¹¹ Not all concur with this interpretation of the theology of the Cappadocian Fathers, but this Eastern theology certainly provides encouragement to a social Trinity. Cf. Coakley, Sarah, “‘Persons’ in the ‘Social’ Doctrine of the Trinity: A Critique of Current Analytic Discussion,” in The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium, 123–44.Google Scholar

¹² Bok, Nico den, Communicating the Most High: A Systematic Study of Person and Trinity in the Theology of Richard of St. Victor (Paris: Brepols, 1996), 75–78.Google Scholar Cf. Hill, William, The Three-Personed God: The Trinity as a Mystery of Salvation (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1982), 79.Google Scholar

¹³ Boff, Leonardo, Trinity and Society, trans. Burns, Paul (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1988), 134.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Richard of St. Victor, The Twelve Patriarchs, The Mystical Ark, Book Three of the Trinity, trans. Zinn, Grover (New York: Paulist, 1979), 381 (III, VIII, 17).Google Scholar For the complete text, see Richard of St. Victor, De Trinitate: text critique avec introduction, notes, et tables, ed. Ribaillier, Jean (Paris: J. Vrin, 1958).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Greshake, Gisbert, Der dreieine Gott: Eine trinitarische Theologie (Freiburg: Herder, 1997), 198Google Scholar (my translation). Greshake cites Aquinas, Thomas, Summa theologiae Ia, 39, 2.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Greshake, , Der dreieine Gott, 182.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Greshake uses the Latin term communio instead of the German Gemeinschaft to communicate a dynamic quality which he believes the German term lacks. See ibid., 177.

¹⁸ Greshake, Gisbert, An den drei-einen Gott glauben: Ein Schlüssel zum Verstehen (Freiburg: Herder, 1998), 16.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Greshake, Gisbert, “Der drei-eine Gott der Christen,” in Fragen nach Gott ed. Strocka, Volker, (Frankfurt: Josef Knecht, 1996), 138.Google Scholar

²⁰ Greshake, , Der dreieine Gott, 185.Google Scholar

²¹ Ibid., 180.

²² Ibid., 153–55. Reference is to Buber, Martin, I and Thou, trans. Kaufmann, Walter, (New York: Scribner Press, 1970).Google Scholar

²³ Greshake, , Der dreieine Gott, 178.Google Scholar

²⁴ Boff, , Trinity and Society, 120.Google Scholar

²⁵ Ibid., 9.

²⁶ Ibid., 98.

²⁷ Ibid., 11. See also Boff, Leonardo, Holy Trinity, Perfect Community trans. Berryman, Phillip (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2000).Google Scholar

²⁸ Boff, , Trinity and Society, 120.Google Scholar

²⁹ Ibid., 123. Cf. Greshake, , Der dreieine Gott, 443.Google Scholar

³⁰ Rahner, Karl, The Trinity, trans. Donceel, Joseph (New York: Herder and Herder, 1970), 22.Google Scholar

³¹ Boff, , Trinity and Society, 145.Google Scholar

³² Greshake argues this same point; see Der dreieine Gott, 21–22; 378–379.

³³ Ibid., 136.

³⁴ Greshake, , Der dreieine Gott, 94.Google Scholar

³⁵ Boff, , Trinity and Society, 129.Google Scholar

³⁶ Congregation for the Clergy, General Directory for Catechesis (Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference, 1997), no. 100.Google Scholar

³⁷ Catechism of the Catholic Church (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana/New York: Paulist, 1994), no. 1702.

³⁸ Wiederkehr, Dietrich, review of Der dreieine Gott: Eine trinitarische Theologie, Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 45 (1998): 332.Google Scholar Cf. Siebenrock, Roman, “Urgrund der Heilsgeschichte: Trinitätstheologie,” in Der Denkweg Karl Rahners: Quellen—Enwicklungen—Perspektiven, ed. Batlogg, A. et al. , (Mainz: Matthias Grünewald, 2003), 218–20Google Scholar; Stubenrauch, Bertram, Dreifaltigkeit (Regensburg: Friderich Pustet, 2002), 11–14.Google Scholar

³⁹ Wiederkehr, , review of Der dreieine Gott, 332.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Stubenrauch, , Dreifaltigkeit, 13.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Ibid.

⁴² Vorgrimler, Herbert, Gott: Vater, Sohn, und Heiliger Geist (Münster: Aschendorff, 2003), 121–22.Google Scholar

⁴³ Haight, Roger, “Critical Witness: The Question of Method,” in Faithful Witness, ed. O'Donovan, Leo and Sanks, Thomas (New York: Crossroad, 1989), 187–192.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ The quotation is from Cyprian, , De Orat. Dom. 23.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Komonchak, Joseph, “Concepts of Communion: Past and Present,” Cristianesimo nella storia 16 (1995): 321.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Doyle argues that a communion ecclesiology based on the documents of Vatican II must show the church to be divine, mystical, sacramental, historical and social. See Communion Ecclesiology, 175–77.

⁴⁷ Extraordinary Synod of 1985 “The Church, in the Word of God, Celebrates the Mysteries of Christ for Salvation of the World,” Origins 15 (19 December 1985): 448.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on Some Aspects of the Church understood as Communion,” L'Osservatore Romano, English edition, 17 June 1992, 1.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Komonchak, , “Concepts of Communion,” 334.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Doyle, , Communion Ecclesiology, 12.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Komonchak, , “Concepts of Communion,” 336.Google Scholar Cf. Dulles, Avery, “The Church as Communion,” in New Perspectives on Historical Theology: Essays in Memory of John Meyendorff ed. Nassif, Bradley (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Press, 1996).Google Scholar

⁵² Cf. Doyle, , Communion Ecclesiology, v–vii.Google Scholar

⁵³ Boff, Leonardo, Church: Charism and Power, Liberation Theology and the Institutional Church, trans. Burns, Paul (New York: Crossroad, 1985).Google Scholar The original edition of this book prompted the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith to issue its “Notification to Father Leonardo Boff,” Origins 14 (April 4, 1985): 683–87.

⁵⁴ Boff, Leonardo, Ecclesiogenesis: The Base Communities Reinvent the Church, trans. Barr, Robert R. (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1986).Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Ibid., 15–22.

⁵⁶ Lakeland, Paul, The Liberation of the Laity: In Search of an Accountable Church (New York: Continuum, 2003), 221.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Tillard, J.-M. R., Church of Churches: The Ecclesiology of Communion trans. Peaux, R.C. De (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 1992), 43–5.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Boff, , Trinity and Society, 207–12.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Boff, , Holy Trinity, Perfect Community, 67Google Scholar (emphasis original).

⁶⁰ Peterson, Erik, Eis Theos: Epigraphische, Formgeschichtliche und Religionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1926).Google Scholar

⁶¹ Greshake, , Der dreieine Gott, 177.Google Scholar

⁶² Ibid., 28.

⁶³ Greshake, Gisbert, “Zentralismus oder Communio der Kirchen?” in Öffnung zum Heute, ed. Struppe, Ursla and Weismayer, Josef (Innsbruck: Tyrolia, 1991), 31–53.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Greshake, Gisbert, “Communio—Schlüsselbegriff der Dogmatik,” in Gemeinsam Kirche sein, ed. Biemer, Günter, Casper, Bernhard, and Müller, Joseph (Freiburg: Herder, 1992), 90–121.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Ibid., 104.

⁶⁶ Greshake, , An den drei-einen Gott glauben, 97.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Greshake, Gisbert, “‘Zwischeninstanzen’ zwischen Papst und Ortsbischöfen Notwendige Voraussetzung für die Verwirklichung der Kirche als ‘communio ecclesiarum,’” in Die Bischofskonferenz, ed. Müller, Hubert and Pottmeyer, Hermann, (Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1989), 88–115.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Greshake, , An den drei-einen Gott glauben, 67–69Google Scholar; 74–77.

⁶⁹ Lakeland, , The Liberation of the Laity, 221.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Luzbetak, Louis, The Church and Culture: New Perspectives in Missiological Anthropology (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1988), 337.Google Scholar Similar criticisms can be found in Fuellenbach, John, Church: Community for the Kingdom (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2002).Google Scholar

⁷¹ Zizioulas, John, Being as Communion (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1985).Google Scholar Greshake comments on Zizioulas', arguments in Der dreieine Gott, 86–90.Google Scholar

⁷² Greshake, , An den drei-einen Gott glauben, 89.Google Scholar